Advertisement

Automatic Construction of Qualitative Models

  • A. C. Cem Say
  • Selahattin Kuru
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 114)

Abstract

The needs for the use of deep domain models and an ability to handle incompletely specified information are evident in most of today’s expert systems. Much AI research in the area of qualitative reasoning (Weld and de Kleer 1990) has addressed this problem. Qualitative models of (usually very simple) physical systems have been formulated and various temporal and spatial reasoning programs working on these models have been developed.

Keywords

Input State Region Normal Operating Region Qualitative Reasoning Qualitative Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Weld, D.S., de Kleer, J. (1990) Readings in qualitative reasoning about physical systems. San M ateo: Morgan Kaufmann de Kleer, J., Brown, J.S. (1984) A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence 24, 7–83Google Scholar
  2. Kuipers, B. (1986) Qualitative simulation. Artificial Intelligence 29, 289-338 Forbus, K.D. (1990) Interpreting observations of physical systems. In: D.S. Weld, J. de Kleer, (eds.) Readings in qualitative reasoning about physical systems. San M ateo: Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  3. Weld, D.S. (1988) Comparative analysis. Artificial Intelligence 36, 333-373 Weld, D.S. (1990) Exaggeration. Artificial Intelligence 43, 311–368MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Say, A.C.C., Kuru, S. (1990) Postdiction by qualitative simulation. In: A.E. Harmanc1, E. Gelenbe (eds.) Fifth International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences. Proceedings, Nevşehir 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Say, A.C.C., Kuru, S. (1992) An extension of the corresponding value technique in qualitative modeling and simulation. In: K. Oflazer, V. Akman, H.A. Güvenir, U. Halic1 (eds.) 1. Türk Yapay Zeka ve Yapay Sinir Ağlar1 Sempozyumu. Proceedings, Ankara 1992.Google Scholar
  6. Say, A.C.C. (1992) Qualitative system identification. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  7. Kuipers, B. (1987a) Qualitative simulation as causal explanation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17, 432–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuipers, B. (1989a) Qualitative reasoning with causal models in diagnosis of complex systems. In: L.E. Widman, K.A Loparo, N.R. Nielsen (eds.) Artificial intelligence, simulation and modeling. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuipers, B. (1987b) Abstraction by time-scale in qualitative simulation. In: Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings.Google Scholar
  10. Forbus, K.D. (1984) Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence 24, 85–168 Charniak, E., McDermott, D. (1985) Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Penrose, R. (1989) The emperor’s new mind. Oxford: Oxford U. Press Kuipers, B. (1989b) Qualitative reasoning: Modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge. Automatica 25, 571–585Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Cem Say
    • 1
  • Selahattin Kuru
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Engineering DepartmentBogazici UniversityBebekTurkey

Personalised recommendations