Abstract
Physicists have always made use of constructions more or less equivalent to catastrophe theory in investigations of concrete problems. In this sense, catastrophe theory may be compared with mathematical analysis. Without the help of analysis, Huygens was able to solve the majority of problems solved by Newton. But such solutions required the genius of Huygens while, nowadays, the same problems may be solved with the help of analysis by any student. In exactly the same way, mastery of the technique of singularity theory allows one to obtain results automatically that otherwise require inventiveness and substantial efforts of imagination, simultaneously extending them to more complicated situations where “elementary” methods would lead to vast calculations. (1974) in an article “Nobel prizes for catastrophes” points out many examples of acknowledged physical achievements, whose authors, independently of one another, used ideas formalized later in singularity theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnol’d, V.I. (1994). Physicists’ Treatment of Catastrophes Before Catastrophe Theory. In: Arnol’d, V.I. (eds) Dynamical Systems V. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57884-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57884-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65379-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57884-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive