Skip to main content

Videoconferencing: Economic Arguments on an Overrated Communication Network

  • Chapter
Networks in Action

Abstract

For quite some time videoconferences have now been presented as a valuable alternative for business travel. But empirical evidence for a rising market share of this medium is hard to find. Explanations normally refer to the lack of knowledge in firms that hinders them to exploit the competitive advantages that could be gained by the use of this fanciful medium. This reference to irrational behavior is not very appealing, at least to economists. In this chapter, videoconferencing is first considered from a firm’s perspective. A firm decides on its least cost communication strategy by comparing the generalized cost of videoconferencing to the cost related to business travel. It is argued that the cost advantages of business travel are obviously still relevant in most cases. Second, videoconferencing is considered from a market perspective. On this level network externalities exist that hinder a wide use of the new medium. Moreover, regulation and infrastructure policy are further possible reasons for the low competitiveness of videoconferencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennison, D. J. “Transport/Telecommunication Interactions: Empirical Evidence from a Videoconferencing Feld Trial in the United Kingdom.” Transportation Research. 22A (1988): 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Button, K. J. “Study for the Video Conferencing Study. A Department of Trade and Industry.” Internal Report. Loughborough: Loughborough University, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katz M. L., and C. Shapiro. “Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities.” J. Pol Econ. 94 (1986): 822–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liebowitz, S. J., and S. E. Margolis. “The Fable of the Keys.” J. Law and Econ. 33 (1990): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liebowitz, S. J., and S. E. Margolis. “Understanding Network Externalities.” Paper presented at WEAI 68th Annual Conference, San Francisco, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mokhtarian, P. L. “An Empirical Evaluation of the Travel Impacts of Teleconferencing.” Transportation Research 20A (1986): 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Salomon, I., N. Schneider, and J. Schofer. “Are Telecommunications Costs Cheaper than Travel? An Examination of Interaction Costs in a Business Setting.” Paper presented at the 5th WCTR in Yokohama, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maggi, R. (1995). Videoconferencing: Economic Arguments on an Overrated Communication Network. In: Batten, D., Casti, J., Thord, R. (eds) Networks in Action. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57843-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57843-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63376-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57843-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics