Skip to main content

Solidarity: An indispensable concept in social security1

  • Chapter
Social Security and Solidarity in the European Union

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

In the previous chapters much has been said about the performance of social security systems. In this contribution, we will present a normative approach to this performance. Social security should be considered a mechanism for society to care for those who are in need. In this sense, social security is not only a matter of structures, interests and calculations but it also is an ethical issue, reflecting both the self-interest of the well-to-do and the ethical obligation of the young, the healthy, the employed, and the well-to-do vis-à-vis the old, the sick, the unemployed, and the poor. We will reflect on this ethical dimension by using the concept of solidarity. In this paragraph, we will make some general remarks on solidarity. In paragraph 2, we will focus on the relationship between solidarity and social security. Next, we will focus on a few of the consequences which the development of social security systems in Europe seems to have on solidarity (paragraph 3). After an excursion into the social teaching of the churches (paragraph 4), we will draw some conclusions (paragraph 5).

The authors wish to thank Dr. Jan Peet for his contributions to this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. Brockhaus Enzyklopaedie in vierundzwanzig Bänden, FA. Brockhaus, Mannheim 1993, 19th edition, keyword Solidarität.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. the French pacte civil de solidanté [Civil solidarity pact], in: Loi no. 99–944 du 15 novembre 1999 relative au pacte civil de solidarité.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. R.H. Cox, ‘The consequences of welfare reform. How conceptions of social rights are changing’, in: Journal of Social Policy, 27 (1998), no. 1, p. 1–16, esp. p. 1. Cox states that solidarity can no longer be considered the main principle to evaluate welfare states. The question still remains relevant, however, how developments in social security influence the understanding and the shape of solidarity.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is quoted from ‘Internationaal Verdrag inzake Economische, Sociale en Culturele Rechten [International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights]’, published in: E.A. Alkema and H.E. Timmerman (Eds.), Europees Sociaal Handvest. Turijn 18 Oktober 1961. Internationaal Verdrag inzake Economische, Sociale en Culturele Rechten. New York 16 december 1966. Internationale Arbeidsconventies. Diverse internationale verdragen en verklaringen [European Social Charter. Turin, October 18th, 1961. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. New York, December 16th, 1966. International Labour Conventions. Various international covenants and declarations], vol. II (Zwolle 1984), p. 415–497.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The right to work has two faces. The right to work of a beneficiary of social security may come into conflict with the right of a working person to work. Cf D. Mieth, ‘Solidarity and the right to work’, in: Concilium. Theology in the age of renewal, (1982), p. 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. L. Delsen, Exit poldermodel? Sociaal-economische ontwikkeUngen in Nederland. [Exit the Dutch consensus model? Socio-economic developments in the Netherlands], Assen 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. Giarini and P. Liedtke, The employment dilemma and the future of work. Working in the new service economy. Summary by J. Arkell’, in: (July 1998), p. 1–13, esp. p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. van Schilfgaarde, Werk voor iedereen [Work for everyone], Assen 1994. The feasibility of full-time full employment for everyone is discussed in a previous chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sociaal en Cultured Planbureau (Social and Cultural Planning Office) and Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (Central Office for Statistics), Armoedemonitor 1999 [Poverty Monitor 1999], The Hague 1999. Cahier 163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. Giarini and Liedtke, ‘The employment dilemma’, p. 9–13. See also the long-term scenario as described in the previous chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. Jean Paul II, ‘Lettre Encyclique Centesimus Annus ‘à l’occasion du centenaire de l’encyclique Rerum Novarum’ [Encyclical letter Centesimus Annus ‘on the occasion of the centennial of the encyclical Rerum Novarum’]’, in: De ‘Rerum Novarum’ à ‘Centesimus Annus’. Textes intégraux des deux encycliques avec deux études de Roger Aubert et Michel Schooyans [From ‘Rerum Novarum’ to ‘Centesimus Annus’. The complete and unabridged texts of two encyclicals with two essays by Roger Aubert and Michel Schooyans] (Vatican City 1991), p. 115–189 (paragraphs 8, 34, 48).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Consultations among the churches and their organizations in the European Union on issues of poverty and social exclusion. Third draft (Version 09.01.97). Final Report, p. 4–5, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. J. Verstraeten, De sociale leer van de Katholieke Kerk en de ‘Derde Weg’ [The social teachings of the Catholic Church and the ‘Third Way’]’, in: L. Bouckaert and G. Bouckaert (Ed.), Metafysiek en engagement. Een personalistische visie op gemeenschap en economie [Metaphysics and commitment. A personalistic view on community and economy], Leuven, Amersfoort 1992, 51–63, 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See also: Europe se commissies Justitia et Pax, verklar ing over armoede in Europa. Europe se conferentie Justina et Pax, Kerkrade, 12 oktober 1996. [The European Committees of ‘Justitia et Pax’: Declaration on poverty in Europe. European Conference ‘Justitia et Pax’, Kerkrade, October 12th, 1996]’, in: 121 Kerkelijke Documentatie [121 Ecclesiastical Documentation], 25 (1997), p.115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Lazar and P. Stoyko, ‘The future of the welfare State’, in: International Social Security Review, 51 (1998), no. 3, p. 3–36, esp. p. 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibidem, p. 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tinga, K., Verbraak, E. (2000). Solidarity: An indispensable concept in social security1 . In: van Vugt, J.P.A., et al. Social Security and Solidarity in the European Union. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57676-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57676-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1334-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57676-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics