Advertisement

On the long run effect of public capital on aggregate output: Estimation and sensitivity analysis

Conference paper
  • 95 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Empirical Economics book series (STUDEMP)

Abstract

We undertake a sensitivity analysis of the productivity of public capital under the aggregate production function approach. Several proxies are used for the private inputs and for public capital, several dummy variables are included to adjust for energy price shocks, newly revised data is studied, and Stock and Watson’s dynamic OLS estimator is used. Our main results are that the productivity of public capital depends critically on the proxies used, the effects are typically smaller than the early estimates, and omitting the oil price shocks introduces significant upward bias in the measured productivity of public capital.

Key words

Public capital sensitivity analysis DOLS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Aschauer D (1989) Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics 23:177–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batina RG (1998) On the long run effects of public capital and disaggregated public capital on aggregate output. International Tax and Public Finance 5:263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeJong D, Whiteman C (1992) Reconsidering trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 28:221–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gramlich E (1994) Infrastructure investment: A review essay. Journal of Economic Literature 32:1176–1196Google Scholar
  5. Hamilton D (1996) How productive are public capital, private capital, human capital, and R&D in the US? mimeoGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton J (1996) This is what happened to the oil price — macroeconomy relationship. Journal of Monetary Economics 38:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Katz A, Herman S (1997a) Improved estimates of fixed reproducible tangible wealth, 1929–1995. Survey of Current Business: 69–92Google Scholar
  9. Katz A, Herman S (1997b) Fixed reproducible tangible wealth in the United States, Revised esti-mates for 1993–95 and summary estimates for 1925–96. Survey of Current Business: 37–47Google Scholar
  10. Munnell A (1990) Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic Review: 1168–1179Google Scholar
  11. Munnell A (1992) Policy watch: Infrastructure investment and economic growth. Journal of Economics Perspectives 6:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smyth DJ (1994) Inflation and growth. Journal of Macroeconomics 16:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stock J, Watson M (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tatom J (1991) Public capital and private sector performance. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review: 3–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations