Summary
The by-now consolidated Business Process Reengineering approaches systematically emphasise the positive value of organisational integration along a logical sequence of interrelated activities (for example the active cycle of the order or the development path of a new product). The advocates of these approaches maintain that a non-integrated business process tends to create redundancies red tape and an inability to respond rapidly to unexpected changes or to new customer needs. By contrast an integrated process should be marked by greater linearity by non-redundant data by increased flexibility and particularly by greater simplicity (see Davenport and Short 1990). In the past five years the astounding spread of integrated information systems (commonly known as ERP — Enterprise Resource Planning) has involved the wholehearted adoption of this philosophy and this further strengthened the managerial rhetoric of integration. In the light of such enthusiasm the objective of this article could be encapsulated in the say: All that glitters is not gold. Metaphors aside we shall endeavour to show how that while process integration does indeed have positive effects it also has unexpected and negative effects. In fact paradoxically integration can herald greater information complexity rigidity and ambiguity within responsibilities. So far as methodology is concerned data taken from the qualitative analysis of a company case study will be presented in depth. The company in question is a large industrial concern which was analysed six months after the introduction of an integrated information system aimed at replacing the previous systems in the administration-accounting areas and in those connected with the supply chain (purchase sales forecasts planning of production distribution and order management). Naturally the usual methodological principles are valid for analysing a single case: if a statistical generalisation is not possible an analytical one however valid is licit to the extent that the resulting data can facilitate a more thorough reasoning on theoretical concepts (Yin 1989).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avison, D.E.E. Fitzgerald, G. 1997, Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, Maidenhead, McGraw Hill.
Beretta, S. 1988, La misurazione dell’impatto dei sistemi ERP sulla gestione: problemi di metodo e linee guida di intervento. In Amigoni, F. e Beretta, S. (ed) Information Technology e creazione di valore: analisi del fenomeno SAP, Milano, Egea.
Checkland, P.E. Holwell, S. 1998, Information, Systems and Information Systems, Chichester, Wiley.
Davenport, T.H.E. Short, J.E. 1990, The new industrial engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign, Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 11–27.
Galbraith, J.R. 1973, Designing complex organizations, Reading, Addison Wesley.
Mertens, P., Bodendorf, F., König, W., Picot, A., Schumann, M. 1999, Informatica aziendale, Milano, McGraw-Hill.
Mingers, J. E Stowell (ed) 1997, Information Systems: an emerging discipline?, Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill.
Orlikowski, W.J. 1992, The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations, Organization Science, Vol.3, n.3, august, pp.398–427.
Ravagnani, R. 2000, Information technology e gestione del cambiamento organizzativo, Milano, Egea.
Trauth, E.E. Cole, E. 1992, The organizational interface: a method for supporting end users of packaged software, MIS Quarterly, march, pp.35–53.
Yin, R.K. 1989, Case study research, London, Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
De Marco, M., Rajola, F., Ravagnani, R. (2001). Integration and Flexibility: Expected and Undesired Effects in Information Technology Projects. In: Buhl, H.U., Huther, A., Reitwiesner, B. (eds) Information Age Economy. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57547-1_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57547-1_49
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63300-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57547-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive