Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik – Grundlagen, klinische Erfahrungen und Vergleich mit konventioneller Implantationstechnik

  • Chapter
Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery

Part of the book series: Fortbildung Orthopädie - Traumatologie ((FORTORTHO,volume 6))

  • 34 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Standzeiten von Knieendoprothesen können heute als ausgesprochen akzeptabel bezeichnet werden. Überlebensraten bewegen sich in einem Rahmen von 80% bis über 95% bei Zeiträumen von mehr als 10 Jahren [9, 14, 19, 23]. Im Hinblick auf die Langzeitergebnisse besteht, neben anderen beeinflussenden Faktoren, eine enge Beziehung zwischen der Wiederherstellung normaler Achsverhältnisse der unteren Extremität und den erreichbaren Langzeitergebnissen. Mithin ist die korrekte Ausrichtung endoprothetischer Komponenten am Kniegelenk eine wesentliche Voraussetzung für deren Langlebigkeit [1, 4, 5, 8, 12, 21, 23].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MAR (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 173:178–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies BL, Picard F, Leitner F (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Colgan BD (1998) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery, image guided and robotic assistive technologies. Clin Orthop 354:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN (1981) The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop 160:94–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hvid I, Nielsen S (1984) Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 55:160–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:709–714

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang C, Insall JN (1989) Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Clin Orthop 248:5056

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonsson B, Astrom J (1988) Alignment and longterm clinical results of a semi-constrained knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 226:124–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1986) Survival of knee arthroplasties, a nation-wide multicenter investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 68B:795–803

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krackow KA, Serpe L, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Mihallco WM (1999) A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: Progress toward computer assisted TKA. Orthopedics 22:698–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leitner F, Picard F, Minfelde R, Schulz HJ, Clinquin P, Saragaglia D (1997) Computer assisted knee surgical total replacement. In: Troccaz J, Grimson E, Mösges R (eds) CVRMed-MRCAS. Springer, pp 630–638

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Kershally S (2000) Computer integrated instrumentation in knee arthroplasty, a comparative study of conventional and computerized technique. In: Proceedings4thAnnual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery 93–96, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nafei A, Kristensen O, Knudson HM, Hvid I, Jensen J (1996) Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthoplasty 11:7–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:419–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Picard F, Saragaglia D, Montbarbon E, Chaussard C, Leitner F, Raoult 0 (1999) Computer assisted knee arthroplasty - preliminary clinical results with the OrthoPilot System. In: Proceedings, 4thInternational CAOS Symposium, Davos

    Google Scholar 

  17. Picard F, Moody J, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Nikou C, LaBarca RS (2000) A classification proposal for computer-assisted knee systems. In: Proceedings, 4thAnnual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery 89–90, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  18. Picard F, DiGioia AM, Sell D, Moody J, Jaramaz B, Nikou C, LaBarca RS (2000) KneeNav-TKR: Concept and clinical application. In: Proceedings, 4thAnnual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery 99–100, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KH, Maynhard MJ (1993) Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-years survivorship study. Clin Orthop 286:94–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232:168–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299:153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop 371:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Moran MC (1989) Survivorship of cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 71A:398–409

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibial-femoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 67B:551–556

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:721–723

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. R. K. Miehlke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung und Poliklinik für Sportorthopädie, TU München, Connollystraße 32, München, 80809, Deutschland

    Andreas B. Imhoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miehlke, R.K. (2002). Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik – Grundlagen, klinische Erfahrungen und Vergleich mit konventioneller Implantationstechnik. In: Imhoff, A.B. (eds) Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery. Fortbildung Orthopädie - Traumatologie, vol 6. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57527-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57527-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1184-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57527-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation