Zusammenfassung
This paper deals with the consequences of banking regulation for banks and regulators in micro states. Up to now this topic had not been ana-lyzed in the literature.
Banks in micro states are very often specialized banking institutions, dominantly present in the asset management market and active in the off-shore-business. Hence their balance sheet show high relations in interbank loans, but low relations for loans to corporate and private clients.
The new banking regulation proposal called Basel II will cause a lot of changes in equity claims by the regulators. Equity claims are much more influenced by probability of default than the current Basel Accord.
As the results of Quantitative Impact Study 2.5 show, banking institu-tions have to be prepared for much higher equity claims in loans to sov-ereigns and banks, but may count with much lower equity claims for loans to corporations and private clients. Big international banking insti-tutions will therefore expect lower equity claims caused by credit risk, which will be compensated by the new equity claim caused by opera-tional risks.
Banking institutions in micro states cannot expect such a compensation of opposed effects. They have to hold new equity for operational risks, but there is no relief in equity for credit risks, as they show a concentration in interbank credit relations and underdeveloped portfolios in consumer and corporate loans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Abicht, R./Althans, S./Dartsch, A. et al (2002). Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaft. FrankfurtlM..
Berry, J.M. (2001). Central Banks seek sharpening of Risk Assessment. In: International Herald Tribune, 18.01.2001.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2003). The 2002 Loss Data Collection Exercise for Operational Risk: Summary of the Data Collected. March 2003.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2002). Results of Quantitative Impact Study 2.5. June 2002.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2001a). Consultive Document Operational Risk. January 2001.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2001b). Consultive Document Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process). January 2001.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2001c). Consultive Document Pillar 3 (Market Discipline). January 2001.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1988). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards. July 1988.
Basler Ausschuss für Bankenaufsicht (2001a). Die neue Basler Eigenkapitalvereinbarung. Januar 2001.
Basler Ausschuss für Bankenaufsicht (2001b). Überblick über die Neue Basler Eigenkapitalvereinbarung. Januar 2001.
Boos, K.-H./ Schulte-Mattler, H. (2001a). Basel II: Externes und internes Rating. In: Die Bank, 5/2001, S. 346–354.
Boos, K.-H./ Schulte-Mattler, H. (2001b). Basel II: Credit Risk Mitigation im Standardansatz. In: Die Bank, 6/2001, S. 416–424.
Boos, K.-H./ Schulte-Mattler, H. (2001c). Basel II: Credit Risk Mitigation im IRB-Ansatz. In: Die Bank, 7/2001, S. 470–477.
Boos, K.-H./ Schulte-Mattler, H. (2001d). Basel II: Methoden zur Quantifizierung operationeller Risiken. In: Die Bank, 8/2001, S. 549–553.
Borysiak, M./Geginat, M./Herkes, R. (2003). Basel II und die Kreditrisikominderungsinstrumente. Herausgegeben von: Risk Partner SA Luxembourg. Erstellt 30. September 2002, angepasst Februar 2003.
Deutsche Bundesbank (2001). Die neue Basler Eigenkapitalvereinbarung. In: Monatsbericht April 2001, S. 15–44.
Hill, C.W.L. (2001). International Business. 3nd edition, Boston.
Hillen, K.-H. (2001). Anforderungen der Bankenaufsicht. In: G. Hofmann (Hrsg.),Auf dem Weg zu Basel II: Konzepte, Modelle, Meinungen. Frankfurt/M. S. 225–248.
Hofmann, G. (Hrsg.) (2001). Auf dem Weg zu Basel II: Konzepte, Modelle, Meinungen. Frankfurt/M.
Kocher, M.G. (2002). Very Small Countries: Economic Success against all Odds. Schaan.
Naumann, T.K. (2001). Bewertung der Offenlegungspflichten aus Sicht der Banken. In: G. Hofmann (Hrsg.),Auf dem Weg zu Basel II: Konzepte, Modelle, Meinungen. Frankfurt/M. S. 249–264.
Paul, S. (2001). Der Basler Akkord im Überblick. In: G. Hofmann (Hrsg.), Auf dem Weg zu Basel II: Konzepte, Modelle, Meinungen. Frankfurt/M. S. 5–36.
Santos, J. (2000). Bank capital regulation in contemporary banking theory: a review of the literature. In: BIS Working Paper Nr. 90, September 2000.
Spremann, K. (2003). Portfoliomanagement. 2. Aufl., München und Wien.
Wilkens, M./Entrop, O./ Völker, J. (2001). Strukturen und Methoden von Basel II – Grundlegende Veränderungen der Bankenaufsicht. In: Kreditwesen, 4 (2001), S. 187–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Menichetti, M.J. (2003). Basel II und seine Bedeutung für Kleinstaaten. In: Schädler, P., Menichetti, M.J. (eds) Private Banking im Schlaglicht internationaler Regulierungen. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57447-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57447-4_6
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0135-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57447-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive