Skip to main content

Using Management Objectives to Specify Management Information Systems — A Contribution to MIS Success

  • Conference paper
  • 586 Accesses

Abstract

Data warehouse projects, today, are in an ambivalent situation. On the one hand, data warehouses are critical for a company’s success and various methodological and technological tools are sophisticatedly developed to implement them. On the other hand, a significant amount of data warehouse projects fails due to non-technical reasons such as insufficient management support or in-corporative employees. But management support and user participation can be increased dramatically with specification methods that are understandable to these user groups. This paper aims at overcoming possible non-technical failure reasons by introducing a user-adequate specification approach within the field of management information systems.

1

This work has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), record no. 01HW0196.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adam, D.: Planung und Entscheidung. Gabler: 4th edition. Wiesbaden, Germany, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, S. et al.: On the computation of multidimensional aggregates. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, San Francisco, CA, 1996, S. 506-521.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allison, G. T.: Essence of Decisions. Little, Brown. Boston, MA, USA, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ansoff, H. I.: Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY, USA, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ansoff, H. I. et al.: Implanting strategic management. Prentice-Hall: 2nd edition. London, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barbuto Jr., J. E.: How is Strategy Formed in Organizations? A Multi-Disciplinary Taxonomy of Strategy-Making Approaches. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 3(1), 2002: S. 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barnard, C. I.: The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA, USA, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Becker, J. et al.: Specifying Information Systems for Business Process Integration — A Management Perspective. Information Systems and eBusiness Management 1(2), 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Becker, J.; Dreiling, A.; Ribbert, M.: Meta-Model-based Approaches to Information Systems Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Information Resources Management Association Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, J.; Holten, R.: Fachkonzeptuelle Spezifikation von Führungsinformationssystemen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 40(6), 1998: S. 483–492 [in German].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becker, J.; Ribbert, M.; Dreiling, A.: Contribution of Meta Models to Systems Engineering — A CRM Example. In: Proceedings of the Information Systems Foundation: Building the Theoretical Base, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2002, S. 191-204.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Birkigt, K.; Stadler, M. M.; Funck, H. J.: Corporate Identity: Grundlagen, Funktionen, Fallbeispiele. Verlag Moderne Industrie: 5th edition. Landsberg am Lech, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borgman, H. P.: Manager’s information search behaviour using Management Support Systems. Wirtschaftsinformatik 40(6), 1998: S. 527–535.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cabibbo, L.; Torlone, R.: An Architecture for Data Warehousing Supporting Data Independence and Interoperability. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 10(3), 2001: S. 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chaudhuri, S.; Dayal, U.: An overview of data warehousing and olap technology. ACM SIGMOD Record 26(1), 1997: S. 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Codd, E. F.; Codd, S. B.; Salley, C. T.: Providing olap (On-Line Analytical Processing) to User Analysts: An IT Mandate. White Paper, E. F. Codd & Associates, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colliat, G.: OLAP, relational, and multidimensional database systems. ACM SIGMOD Record 25(3), 1996: S. 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 98]_Golfarelli, M.; Maio, D.; Rizzi, S.: The Dimensional Fact Model: A Conceptual Model for Data Warehouses. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 7(2 & 3), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Granger, C. H.: The Hierarchy of Objectives. Harvard Business Review 42(May–June), 1964: S. 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gyssens, M.; Lakshmanan, L. V. S.: A foundation for multi-dimensional databases. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, San Francisco, CA, 1997, S. 106-115.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Henderson, J. C.; Venkatraman, N.: Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations. IBM Systems Journal 38(2/3), 1999: S. 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hillbrand, C. A.; Karagiannis, D.: An Approach to Faciliate Complex Planning Issues by Means of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Cybernetic Cause-and-Effect Models. In: Proceedings of the SCI 2002-6th World Multiconference on Systemics Informatics and Cybernetics, Orlando, FL, USA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hirschheim, R.; Klein, H. K.; Lyytinen, K.: Information Systems Development and Data Modeling. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Hitt, L. M.; Brynjolfsson, E.: Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value. MIS Quarterly 20(2), 1996: S. 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holten, R.: Entwicklung von Führungsinformationssystemen. Ein methodenorientierter Ansatz. Gabler. Wiesbaden, Germany, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holten, R.: Framework and Method for Information Warehouse Development Processes. In: Proceedings of the Data Warehousing 2000 — Methoden, Anwendungen, Strategien, Heidelberg, Germany, 2000, S. 135-163.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Holten, R.: Specification of Management Views in Information Warehouse Projects. Accepted for publication in Information Systems 28, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holten, R.; Dreiling, A.; Schmid, B.: Management Report Engineering — A Swiss Re Business Case. In: Proceedings of the Data Warehousing 2002 Conference, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Im, K. S.; Dow, K. E.; Grover, V.: Research Report: A Reexamination of IT Investments and the Market Value of the Firm-An Event Study Methodology. Information Systems Research 12(1), 2001: S. 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Inmon, W. H.: Building the Data Warehouse. Wiley: 2nd edition. New York, NY et al, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Inmon, W. H.; Hackathorn, R. D.: Using the Data Warehouse. Wiley. New York, NY et al, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Inmon, W. H.; Welch, J. D.; Glassey, K. L.: Managing the Data Warehouse. Wiley. New York, NY et al, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jarke, M. et al.: Architecture and Quality in Data Warehouses. An extended Repository Approach. Information Systems 24(3), 1999: S. 229–253.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jarke, M. et al.: Fundamentals of Data Warehouses. Berlin et al., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang, J. J.; Klein, G.; Discenza, R.: Information System Success as Impacted by Risks and Development Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48(1), 2001: S. 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnston, H. R.; Vitale, M. R.: Creating Competitive Advantages with Interorganizational Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 12(2), 1988: S. 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaplan, R. S.; Norton, D. P.: The Balanced Score Card. Measures that Drive Business Performance. Harvard Business Review 70(January-February), 1992: S. 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kaplan, R. S.; Norton, D. P.: Having Trouble with Your Strategy? Then Map It. Harvard Business Review 78(September-October), 2000: S. 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kaplan, R. S.; Norton, D. P.: Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work. Harvard Business Review 71 (September–October), 1993: S. 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Keil, M.: Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the problem of Project Escalation. MIS Quarterly 19(4), 1995: S. 421–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Keil, M.; Mann, J.; Rai, A.: Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models. MIS Quarterly 24(4), 2000: S. 631–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kupsch, P.: Unternehmensziele. Gustav Fischer-Verlag. Stuttgart, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Latham, G. P.; Kinne, S. B.: Improving Job Performance through Training in Goal Setting. Journal of Applied Psychology 59, 1974: S. 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, J.; Truex, D. P.: Exploring the impact of formal training in ISD methods on the cognitive structure of novice information systems developers. Information Systems Journal 10, 2000: S. 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Li, E. Y.; Chen, H.-G.: Output-driven information system planning: a case study. Information & Management 2001(38), 2001: S. 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Meffert, H.: Marketing. Grundlagen marktorientierter Unternehmensführung. Konzepte — Instrumente — Praxisbeispiele. Gabler. Wiesbaden, Germany, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mintzberg, H.: Strategy Making in Three Modes. California Management Review 16(2), 1973: S. 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Morris, C.: Writings on the General Theory of Signs. Mouton. The Hague, the Netherlands, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mukhopadhyay, T.; Kekre, S.; Kalathur, S.: Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange. MIS Quarterly 19(2), 1995: S. 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nissen, H. W. et al.: Managing Multiple Requirements Perspectives with Metamodels. IEEE Software 13(3), 1996: S. 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Porter, M. E.: What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review 74(November-December), 1996: S. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Riebel, P.: Gestaltungsprobleme einer zweckneutralen Grundrechnung. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 31, 1979: S. 863–893.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Standish Group International, I.: Extreme CHAOS. Research report, ordering information available at www.standishgroup.com, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Steiner, G. A.: Top Management Planning. Macmillan: 13th edition. New York, NY, USA, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Strahringer, S.: Metamodellierung als Instrument des Methodenvergleichs. Eine Evaluierung am Beispiel objektorientierter Analysemethoden. Shaker. Herzogenrath, Germany, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Subramani, M.; Waiden, E.: The Impact of E-Commerce Announcements on the Market Value of Firms. Information Systems Research 12(2), 2001: S. 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tarn, K. Y.: The Impact of Information Technology Investments on Firm Performance and Evaluation: Evidence from Newly Industrialized Economies. Information Systems Research 9(1), 1998: S. 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Todd, P.; Benbasat, I.: Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection. Information Systems Research 10(4), 1999: S. 356–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vassiliadis, P.: Gulliver in the land of data warehousing: practical experiences and observations of a researcher. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses (DMDW2000), Stockholm, Sweden, 2000, S. 12(1)-12(16).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vassiliadis, P.; Sellis, T.: A Survey of Logical Models for OLAP Databases. Sigmod Record 28(4), 1999: S. 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Venkatraman, N.: IT-Enabled Business Transformation: From Automation to Business Scope Redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 1994: S. 73-87.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Widom, J.: Research problems in data warehousing. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, New York, NY, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wixom, B. H.; Watson, H. J.: An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 2001: S. 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Becker, J., Dreiling, A., Ribbert, M. (2003). Using Management Objectives to Specify Management Information Systems — A Contribution to MIS Success. In: Uhr, W., Esswein, W., Schoop, E. (eds) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2003/Band II. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57445-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57445-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63267-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57445-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics