Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Langzeiterfahrung mit dem Navigationssystem OrthoPilot in der Knieendoprothetik

  • Conference paper
Neues in der Knieendoprothetik

Part of the book series: Münsteraner Streitgespräche ((MÜNSTREIT))

  • 40 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Standzeiten von Knieendoprothesen haben heute akzeptable Werte erreicht. Überlebensraten bewegen sich in einem Rahmen von 80% bis über 95% bei Zeiträumen von mehr als 10 Jahren [1–4]. Ein wesentlicher Faktor ist die Wiederherstellung physiologischer Achsverhältnisse. Daher ist die korrekte Ausrichtung der endoprothetischen Komponenten am Kniegelenk eine entscheidende Größe für die Standzeit der Prothesenkomponenten [4–10].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1986) Survival of knee arthroplasties, a nation-wide multicenter investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 68B:795–803

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nafei A, Kristensen O, Knudson HM, Hvid I, Jensen J (1996) Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthoplasty. J Arthoplasty 11:7–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Picard F, Moody J, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Nikou C, LaBarca RS (2000) A classification proposal for computer-assisted knee systems. In: Proceedings4thAnnual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery 89–90, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop 371:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MAR (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 173:178–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN (1981) The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop 160:94–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hvid I, Nielsen S (1984) Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 55:160–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonsson B, Astrom J (1988) Alignment and long-term clinical results of a semi-constrained knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 226:124–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299:153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:709–714

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232:168–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies BL, Picard F, Leitner F (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krackow KA, Serpe L, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Mihalko WM (1999) A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: Progress toward computer assisted TKA. Orthopedics 22:698–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leitner F, Picard F, Minfelde R, Schulz HJ, Clinquin P, Saragaglia D (1997) Computer assisted knee surgical total replacement. In: CVRMed-MRCAS. Troccaz J, Grimson E, Mösges R (Hrsg), Springer, pp 630–638

    Google Scholar 

  16. Picard F, DiGioia AM, Sell D, Moody J, Jaramaz B, Nikou C, LaBarca RS (2000) KneeNav-TKR: Concept and clinical application. In: Proceedings, 4thAnnual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, pp 99–100

    Google Scholar 

  17. Picard F, Moody J, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Nikou C, LaBarca RS (2000) A classification proposal for computer-assisted knee systems. In: Proceedings, 4thAnnual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, pp 89–90

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Kershally S (1990) Computer integrated instrumentation in knee arthroplasty, a comparative study of conventional and computerized technique. In: Proceedings, 4thAnnual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, pp 93–96

    Google Scholar 

  19. Picard F, Saragaglia D, Montbarbon E, Chaussard C, Leitner F, Raoult O (1999) Computer assisted knee arthroplasty - preliminary clinical results with the OrthoPilot System. In: Proceedings, 4thInternational CAOS Symposium, Davos

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bonnici AV, Allen PR (1991) Comparison of long leg and simple knee radiographs in assesment of knees prior to surgery. J Bone and Joint Surg (Br) 73-B Supp 1:65

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patel DV, Ferris BD, Aichroth PM (1991) Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 15:209–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dorr LD, Conaty JP, Schreffier R, Mehne DK, Hull D (1985) Technical factors that influence mechanical loosening of total knee arthroplasty. In: Dorr LD, (ed). The knee. Baltimore University Park Press, pp 121–135

    Google Scholar 

  23. Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assesment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty Vol 3. No. 1:67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang CC, Insall JN (1989) Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur:-Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 248:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  25. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignement measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop 371:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effecdt of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignement at the knee. Orthopaedics 13:861–868

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignement using long radiographs. J Bone and Joint Surg 73 B No. 5:721–723

    Google Scholar 

  28. Coull R, Bankes MJK, Rossouw DJ (1999) Evaluation of tibial component angles in 79 consecutive total knee arthroplasties. The knee 6:235–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bach CM, Steingruber IE, Peer S, Nogler M, Wimmer C, Ogon M (2001) Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 385:144–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stuhlberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D (2000) Computer assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Operative techniques in orthopaedics Vol 10, No. 1:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Picard F, Leitner F, Raoult O, Saragaglia D (1999) Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. In: Rechnergestützte Verfahren in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Steinkopff Verlag, pp 461–471

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. U. Clemens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Bause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. K. Miehlke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemeine Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Straße 33, Münster, 48149

    Susanne Fuchs  & Carsten O. Tibesku  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clemens, U., Bause, L., Miehlke, R.K. (2003). Langzeiterfahrung mit dem Navigationssystem OrthoPilot in der Knieendoprothetik. In: Fuchs, S., Tibesku, C.O. (eds) Neues in der Knieendoprothetik. Münsteraner Streitgespräche. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57368-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57368-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1388-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57368-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation