Skip to main content

Comparison of navigation-, robot-assisted and personalized tools in knee surgery

  • Conference paper
Book cover Neues in der Knieendoprothetik

Part of the book series: Münsteraner Streitgespräche ((MÜNSTREIT))

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

Technology is being integrated more and more in surgery to increase the quality of patient treatment. The surgeon’s manual skills are complemented by navigation systems, surgical robots or individualised mechanical guides. Navigation systems track the motion of surgical instruments relative to the patient’s organs. Surgical robots have been developed for hard and soft tissue surgery. By using this type of surgical assistant, the motion of the tool is constrained or filtered in some way or another to achieve higher accuracy and precision, maintaining at the same time high standards of safety. Individualised surgical guides constitute a cost efficient solution to provide the surgeon with enhanced safety when performing potentially dangerous surgical actions. This paper will review some developments in the areas of computer integrated surgery mentioned above, and indicate some pathways for further progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Davies B (2000) A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 214:129–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denis K, Van Ham G, Bellemans J, Labey L, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R, Van der Perre G, De Schutter J (2002) ‘How Correctly Does an Intramedullary Rod Represent the Longitudinal Tibial Axes?’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Number 396, March 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, Hibberd RD, Davies BL, Wickham JE, Nathan MS, Kundu B (1997) ‘The Probot-an active robot for prostate resection’ Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 211:4 317–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazanzides P, Mittelstadt BD, Musits BL, Bargar WL, Zuhars JF, Williamson B, Cain P, Carbone EJ (1995) ‘An integrated system for cementless hip replacement: robotics and medical imaging technology enhance surgical precision’ IEEE Eng Med Biol, pp 307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienzle III T, Stulberg S, Peshkin M, Quaid A, Lea J, Goswami A, Wu C (1995) ‘Total knee replacement. Computer-assisted surgical system uses a calibrated robot’ IEEE Eng in Med and Biol, pp 301–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayall S (1988) ‘A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery’ IEEE Trans Biomed Engng 35:153–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng WS, Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Timoney AG (1993) ‘A firsthand experience in trans-urethral resection of the prostate’ IEEE EMBS J, pp 120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Radermacher K, Staudte H-W, Rau G (1994) Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery by means of Individual Templates - Aspects and Analysis of Potential Applications. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery (MRCAS) 1:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban V, Wapler M, Weisener T, Schonmayr R (1999) ‘A tactile feedback hexapod operating robot for endoscopic procedures’ Neurol Res 21:28–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham G, Denis K, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R, Van der Perre G, De Schutter J, Aertbelin E, Bellemans J, Fabry G (1998) ‘A force controlled robot as a surgical tool in total knee arthroplasty’ Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ‘88, Ed. Lemke, Vannier, Inamura and Farman, pp 609–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzinger F, Birkfellner W, Wanschitz F, Ziya F, Wagner A, Kremser J, Kainberger F, Huber K, Bergmann H, Ewers R (2001) ‘Placement of endosteal implants in the zygoma after maxillectomy: a cadaver study using surgical navigation’ Plast Reconstr Surg, p 659–667

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

vander Sloten, J., Denis, K., van Ham, G., de Schutter, J. (2003). Comparison of navigation-, robot-assisted and personalized tools in knee surgery. In: Fuchs, S., Tibesku, C.O. (eds) Neues in der Knieendoprothetik. Münsteraner Streitgespräche. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57368-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57368-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1388-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57368-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics