Skip to main content

Fair Allocations using Multicriteria Power Indices

  • Conference paper
  • 316 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 487))

Abstract

In an allocation problem to determine a fair distribution of some divisible benefit or cost amongst members of a group, there are often a number of input criteria which may be used to make the allocation. We propose the weighted multicriteria power index, which combines traditional voting power in committees with the concept of criteria weighting, to yield a fair allocation. The multicriteria power index can be refined to allow for a moderation or amplification of the voting power of the members of the group, which in the limit would lead to parity or priority (respectively) of the members’ power. Two well- documented power indices (the Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf-Coleman power indices) are extended to operate under multiple criteria, and are used in an illustrative example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allingham, M.G. (1975). “Economie Power and Values of Games”, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 35, 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf, J.F. (1965). “Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis”, Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1971). “Control of Collectivities and the Power of the Collectivity to Act”. In B. Liberman (éd.) Social Choice, New York, 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambarelli, G. (1990). “A New Approach for Evaluating the Shapley Value”, Optimization, 21, 445–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1978). “A Priori Party Power and Government Formation”, Munich Social Science Review, 4, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. and Packel, E.W. (1983). “Power, Luck and the Right Index”, Journal of Economics, 43, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. and Li, X. (1995). “From Public Good Index to Public Value: An Axiomatic Approach and Generalization”, Control and Cybernetics, 24, 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holubiec, J.W. and Mercik, J.W. (1994). Inside Voting Procedures, Accedo Verlag, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lootsma, F.A., Ramanathan, R. and Schuijt, H. (1998). “Fairness and Equity via Concepts of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. In T.J. Stewart and R.C. van den Honert (eds.) Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making, Springer, Heidelberg, 210–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1982). Game Theory, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.E. (ed.) (1988). The Shapley Value: Essays in Honour of Lloyd S. Shapley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M. (1954). “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System”, American Political Science Review, 48, 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F. (1996). “Weights and Votes in European Union: Extension and Institutional Reform”, Prague Economic Papers, 2, 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F. (1998). “Monotonicity of Power Indices”. In T.J. Stewart and R.C. van den Honert (eds.) Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making, Springer, Heidelberg, 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widgrén, M. (1994). “Voting Power in the EC and the Consequences of Two Different Enlargements”, European Economic Review, 38, 1153–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widgrén, M. (1995). “Probabilistic Voting Power in the EU Council: the Cases of Trade Policy and Social Regulation”, Scandinavian Journal of Economies, 97, 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van den Honert, R.C. (2000). Fair Allocations using Multicriteria Power Indices. In: Haimes, Y.Y., Steuer, R.E. (eds) Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57311-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics