Abstract
Many studies of medical decision making focus on the cost effectiveness of taking action A for disease X. These focused evaluations do not consider that the recommended actions must compete in aggregate for available resources. Relatively fewer studies have considered the aggregate decision making required for the rational design of health care. The operations research perspective and, in particular, the MCDM perspective can aid our understanding of the design of health care plans from the insurer’s and payer’s perspectives. This paper considers issues in defining health benefits plans and suggests how MCDM methodology can assist in structuring the appropriate decision context. Issues to be addressed in designing health plans include global budgets, new technology, system objectives, the hierarchy of decision makers in medical care, and data requirements. While MCDM methods may be useful in health policy making, considering these complex applications can also provide a focus for further conceptual and methodological developments in MCDM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buchanan, J.L., Keeler, E.B., Rolph, J.E., Holmer, M.R. (1991): Simulating Health Expenditures Under Alternative Insurance Plans. Management Science 37(9), 1067–1090
Chase, M. (1994): Oregon’s New Health Rationing Means More Care for Some but Less for Others. The Wall Street Journal, January 28, 1994
Gold, M. (1997): Markets and Public Programs: Insights from Oregon and Tennessee. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 22(2), 633
Jacobson, S. H., Sewell, E. C., Deuson, R., Weniger, B.G. (1998): An Integer Programming Model for Vaccine Procurement and Delivery in the National Childhood Immunization Program: A Pilot Study, unpublished manuscript
Luce, B. R. (1998): Pharmacoeconomics and Managed Care: Methodologic and Policy Issues. Medical Decision Making 18(2,Supplement) S4
Pauly, M. V. (1996): Valuing Health Care Benefits in Money Terms. In: Sloan, F. A. (Ed.) Valuing Health Care: Costs, Benefits, and Effectiveness of Pharmaceuticals and Other Medical Technologies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 99–124
Rutledge, K. M. (1997): The Oregon Health Plan: Lessons Learned. Healthcare Financial Management 51(4), 48
Sainfort, F., Booske, B.C. (1993): Portfolio Theory for Priority Setting in Designing Health Plans. Presentation at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Santhanam, R., Kyparisis, J. (1995): A Multiple Criteria Decision Model for Information System Project Selection. Computers Ops. Res. 22(8), 807–818
Sloan, F. A., Conover, C.J. (1996): The Use of Cost-Effectiveness / Cost-Benefit Analysis in Actual Decision Making: Current Status and Prospects. In: Sloan, F. A. (Ed.) Valuing Health Care: Costs, Benefits, and Effectiveness of Pharmaceuticals and Other Medical Technologies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 207–232
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smith, C.H., Weistroffer, H.R. (2000). On Designing Health Care Plans and Systems from the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Perspective. In: Haimes, Y.Y., Steuer, R.E. (eds) Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67266-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57311-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive