Skip to main content

Forming Win-win Strategy — A New Way to Study Game Problems

  • Conference paper
Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 487))

  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we briefly introduce the concept of habitual domains (HD) and its applications to conflict resolution. Relevant concepts of win-win strategy and mathematical methods for verifying if a joint strategy is a win-win strategy within a range of the relative weights (among the multiple criteria of each player) are derived. We also study the possibility of forming a win-win strategy by changing (or shifting) the habitual domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yu, P. L.(1990). Forming winning strategies: An Integrated Theory of Habitual Domains. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu, P. L. (1985). Multiple-Criteria Decision making: Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions. Plenum, New York, NY.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, P. L. (1995). Habituai Domains: Freeing Yourself from the Limits on Your Life. Highwater Editions, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu, P. L. (1979). “Second-Order Game Problem: Decision Dynamics in Gaming Phenomena,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 27, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Owen, G. (1995). Game Theory, 3rd Edition. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergstresser, K. and P. L. Yu (1977). “Domonation Structures and Multicriteria Problems in N-Person Games,” Theory and Decision, 8, 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, S. Y. (1993). “Existence of a Pareto Equilibrium,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 79, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishizaki, I. and M. Sakawa (1995). “Equilibrium Solutions for Multi-objective Bimatrix Games Incorporating Fuzzy Goals,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 86, 433–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandez, F. R. and J. Purerto (1996). “Vector Linear Programming in Zero-Sum Multicriteria Matrix Games,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 89, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alinsky, S. D. (1972). Rules for Radicals. Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, P. L. and J. M. Li (1998). Forming Win-win Strategy—A New Way to Study Game Problems. Working paper, School of Business, Uni. of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kwon, Y. K., and P. L. Yu (1983). “Conflict Dissolution by Refraining Game Payoffs Using Linear Perturbations,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 39, 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schräge, L. (1984). Linear, Integer, and Quadratic Programming with LINDO. Scientific Press, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, P.L., Li, J.M. (2000). Forming Win-win Strategy — A New Way to Study Game Problems. In: Haimes, Y.Y., Steuer, R.E. (eds) Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57311-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics