Skip to main content

Improving Weighting Information in Interactive Decision Procedures. A Visual Guide

  • Conference paper
Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 487))

  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we address multicriteria decision problems when only partial information is given in the decision making process. We develop a methodology to sequentially incorporate preference information in these processes. A geometrical representation is presented, providing assistance to visualize the quality of the given partial information and to recognize the need of further improvement of this information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carrizosa E., Conde E., Fernández F.R., Puerto J. (1995). Multicrite-ria Analysis with Partial Information About the Weighting Coefficients. European Journal of Operational Research, 81(2), 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chankong V., Haimes J.(1983). Multiobjective Decision Making. North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conde E., Fernández F.R., Puerto J. (1996): Handling linear constraints in interactive weighting based decision procedures. Prepublicación n.2/96 Marzo (1996). Facultad de Matemáticas. Universidad de Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edelsbrunner H. (1987). Algorithms in Geometrical Geometry. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hannan E.L.(1981). Obtaining Nondominated Priority Vectors for Multiple Objective Decision making Problems with Different Combinations of Cardinal and Ordinal Information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man. and Cybernetics, SMC-11(85), 38–543.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang Ch., Masud A. (1979). Multiple Objective Decision Making. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang Ch., Yoo K.(1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkwood C.W. and Sarin R.K.(1985). Ranking with Partial Information. Operations Research, 34, 296–310.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mardia K.V., Kent J.T., Bibby J.M. (1979). Multicriteria Analysis. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mareschal B. and Brans J.P. (1988). Geometrical Representation for MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research, 34,.69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mármol A.M., Puerto J., Fernández F.R. (1998). Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision processes. Prepublicación. 1/98. Facultad de Matemáticas. Universidad de Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  12. [12] Paelinck J. (1975). Qualitative Multiple Criteria Analysis, Environmental Protection and Multiregional Development. European Meeting of the Regional Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  13. [13] Steuer R.E. (1976). Multiple Objective Linear Programming with Interval Criterion Weights. Management Science, 23, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vincke P. (1989). L’aide Multicritere a la Decision. E. de l’Université de Bruselles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fernandez, F.R., Mármol, A., Puerto, J. (2000). Improving Weighting Information in Interactive Decision Procedures. A Visual Guide. In: Haimes, Y.Y., Steuer, R.E. (eds) Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57311-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics