Abstract
This paper discusses a probabilistic utility approach to group decision making for risk assessment. Individual decision makers are assumed to be all anonymous and to possess their unknown and diversified preference structures. The probabilistic utility approach based on random utility models is discussed for the risk assessment. The probabilistic group utility models are defined with the probability distributions called the preference probability. The multiple risk assessment for alternative gamble prospects is discussed, which come from the incomplete information structure. The multiple risk evaluation function is constructed via the probabilistic value tradeoffs on multiple attributes under the alternative gamble prospects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concepts of social welfare, Journal of Political Economy, 58. 328–346.
Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley.2nd ed. 1963.
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., and J. Marschak (1963). Stochastic models of choice behavior, Behavioral Science, 8, 41–55.
Block, H. D.. and J. Marschak (1960), Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses, in I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow and H. B. Mann (eds.) Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Stanford University Press, Stanford. 97–132.
Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives; Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
Luce, R. D. (1958). A probability theory of utility, Econometrica, 26, 193–224.
Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual Choice behavior, Wiley, New York.
Luce, R. D. And H. Raiffa. Games and Decisions, Wiley 1957
Luce, R. D. and P. Suppes (1965). Preferences, Utility, and Subjective Probability, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, III, Chap. 19. Wiley, New York. 249–410.
Luce, R. D. and J. W. Tukey (1964). Simultaneous Conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, I, 1–27.
Marschak, J. (1960). Binary-Choice Constraints and Random Utility Indicators, in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin and P. Suppes (eds.) Mathematical methods in Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford. Chap. 21. 312–329.
Marschak, J. And R. Radner (1972). Economic Theory of Teams, Yale University Press, New Haven.
McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in P. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.. Chap. 4. 105–142.
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Seo, F. and I. Nishizaki (1997). On development of interactive decision analysis support systems (IDASS) in the IDSS environments. Presented paper at the IIASA Workshop, to appear in the proceeding, IIASA, Laxenburg Austria.
Seo, F., Nishizaki, I. and S. Park. (1999). Object-oriented programming for multiattribute utility analysis MAP and its application, Annals of Department of Business Management and Informatics, Setsunan University, Osaka.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Seo, F. (2000). Multiple Risk Assessment with Random Utility Models in Probabilistic Group Decision Making. In: Haimes, Y.Y., Steuer, R.E. (eds) Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67266-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57311-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive