Skip to main content

Multiple Risk Assessment with Random Utility Models in Probabilistic Group Decision Making

  • Conference paper
Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 487))

  • 305 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses a probabilistic utility approach to group decision making for risk assessment. Individual decision makers are assumed to be all anonymous and to possess their unknown and diversified preference structures. The probabilistic utility approach based on random utility models is discussed for the risk assessment. The probabilistic group utility models are defined with the probability distributions called the preference probability. The multiple risk assessment for alternative gamble prospects is discussed, which come from the incomplete information structure. The multiple risk evaluation function is constructed via the probabilistic value tradeoffs on multiple attributes under the alternative gamble prospects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concepts of social welfare, Journal of Political Economy, 58. 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley.2nd ed. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., and J. Marschak (1963). Stochastic models of choice behavior, Behavioral Science, 8, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, H. D.. and J. Marschak (1960), Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses, in I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow and H. B. Mann (eds.) Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Stanford University Press, Stanford. 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives; Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1958). A probability theory of utility, Econometrica, 26, 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual Choice behavior, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. And H. Raiffa. Games and Decisions, Wiley 1957

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and P. Suppes (1965). Preferences, Utility, and Subjective Probability, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, III, Chap. 19. Wiley, New York. 249–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and J. W. Tukey (1964). Simultaneous Conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, I, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J. (1960). Binary-Choice Constraints and Random Utility Indicators, in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin and P. Suppes (eds.) Mathematical methods in Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford. Chap. 21. 312–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J. And R. Radner (1972). Economic Theory of Teams, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in P. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.. Chap. 4. 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, F. and I. Nishizaki (1997). On development of interactive decision analysis support systems (IDASS) in the IDSS environments. Presented paper at the IIASA Workshop, to appear in the proceeding, IIASA, Laxenburg Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, F., Nishizaki, I. and S. Park. (1999). Object-oriented programming for multiattribute utility analysis MAP and its application, Annals of Department of Business Management and Informatics, Setsunan University, Osaka.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seo, F. (2000). Multiple Risk Assessment with Random Utility Models in Probabilistic Group Decision Making. In: Haimes, Y.Y., Steuer, R.E. (eds) Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57311-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics