Skip to main content
  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

Decisions about the kind of risk management not only influence the optimal hedging volume, but also affect the optimal production level. We compare hedging advices in two different model environments. Optimal production levels (and optimal hedging volumes) are determined in models with and without futures markets in a conventional modeling approach and in a rational expectations equilibrium (REE). Results differ substantially. Hedging on the futures market is always advantageous and leads to an increased output in the conventional setting, if short hedging (normal hedge or reversed hedge) is optimal. In our REE-model, in case of non-zero output level, only normal hedge is compatible with the assumption of risk-averse market participants. Nevertheless, an active risk management is not always advantageous. If the number of producers exceeds the number of speculators, producers should only take positions on the futures market, when information about a decreasing spot market demand (which has to lie between certain bounds) prevails in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bamberg, G. and Baur, F. (1987): Commodity Futures Markets and the Level of Production. In: Opitz, O. and Rauhut, R. (Eds.): Ökonomie und Mathematik. Springer, Berlin, 381–395.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Danthine, J.-P. (1978): Information, Futures Prices, and Stabilizing Speculation. Journal of Economic Theory, 17, 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J. (1981): An Introduction to the Theory of Rational Expectations under Asymmetric Information. Review of Economic Studies, 48,541–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KÜrsten, W. (1997a): Hedgingmodelle, Unternehmensproduktion und antizipatorisch-simultanes Risikomanagement. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Sonderheft 38, 127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • KÜrsten, W. (1997b): Standardhedging, Simultanhedging und Portefeuille-Theorie. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 26(3), 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, J.F. (1961): Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements. Econometrica, 29(3), 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Limperger, J. (2000). Impacts of Hedging with Futures on Optimal Production Levels. In: Decker, R., Gaul, W. (eds) Classification and Information Processing at the Turn of the Millennium. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57280-7_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57280-7_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67589-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57280-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics