Abstract
The use of artificial neuronal networks (ANNs) to model environmental problems is increasing. They have been used to model systems as diverse as algal distributions in oceans (Simpson et al. 1992), grassland community changes (Tan and Smeins 1996), and in the recognition of birdsong (McIlraith and Card 1997). They are well suited to modelling complex nonlinear systems which are inherently ‘noisy,’ a characteristic that makes them suited to modelling environmental systems. They have been used in studies in this and related papers, to model environmental influences on the impact of tropospheric ozone pollution on plants (Balls et al. 1995; Balls et al. 1996; Roadknight et al. 1997; Ball et al. 1998).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aphalo PJ, Jarvis PG (1991) Do stomata respond to relative humidity? Plant Cell and Environment 14:127-132
Ball GR, Skarby L, Fuhrer J, Sanchez-Gimeno B, Palmer-Brown D, Mills GE (1998) Identifying factors which modify the effects of ambient ozone on white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in Europe. Environmental Pollution 103:7-16
Balls GR, Sanders GE, Palmer-Brown D (1995) Unravelling the complex interactions between microclimate ozone dose and ozone injury in clover (Trifolium subterraneum L. cv. Geraldton). Water Air and Soil Pollution 85:1467-1472
Balls GR, Sanders GE, Palmer-Brown D (1996) Investigating microclimatic influences on ozone injury in clover (Trifolium subterraneum L. cv. Geraldton) using artificial neuronal networks. New Phytologist 132:271-280
Benitez JM, Castro JL, Requena I (1997) Are artificial neuronal networks black boxes? IEEE Transactions on Neuronal Networks 8(5):1156-1164
Colls JJ, Sanders GE, Geissler PA, Bonte J, Galaup S, Weigel H-J, Ashmore MR, Jones M (1993) The responses of beans exposed to air pollution in open-top chambers. Air Pollution Research Report 48. The European open-top chamber project: Assessment of the effects of air pollutants on agricultural crops
Comrie AC (1997) Comparing neuronal networks and regression models for ozone forecasting. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 47(6):653-663
Emberson LD (1996) Defining and mapping relative potential sensitivity to ozone. Ph.D. Thesis, Centre for Environmental Technology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Fry JC (1993) Biological data analysis. A practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Grantz DA, Meinzer FC (1990) Stomatal response to humidity in a sugar cane field: Simultaneous porometric and micrometeorological measurements. Plant Cell and Environment 13:27-37
Gutiérrez MV, Meinzer FC, Grantz DA (1994) Regulation of transpiration in coffee hedgerows: Co-variation of environmental variables and apparent responses of stomata to wind and humidity. Plant Cell and Environment 17:1305-1313
Herbst M (1995) Stomatal behavior in a beech canopy - an analysis of Bowen-ratio measurements compared with porometer data. Plant Cell and Environment 18(9):1010-1018
Kallarackal J, Somen CK (1997) Water use by Eucalyptus tereticornis stands of differing density in Southern India. Tree Physiology 17(3):195-203
Kerstiens G, Federholzner R, Lendzian KJ (1992) Dry deposition and cuticular uptake of pollutant gas-ses. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 42:239-253
Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Aulagnier S (1996) Application of neuronal networks to modelling non-linear relationships in ecology. Ecol Model 90(1):39-152
Leuning R (1995) A critic\al-appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C-3 plants. Plant Cell and Environment 18(4):339-355
McIlraith AL, Card HC (1997) Birdsong recognition using backpropagation and multivariate statistics. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 45(11):2740-2748
Pääkkönen E, Metsärinne S, Holopainen T, Kärenlampi L (1995) The ozone sensitivity of birch (Betula pendula L.) in relation to the developmental stage of the leaves. New Phytologist 132:145-154
Paruelo JM, Tomasel F (1997) Prediction of functional characteristics of ecosystems: A comparison of artificial neuronal networks and regression models. Ecol Model 98(2-3):173-186
Roadknight CM, Balls GR, Mills GE, Palmer-Brown D (1997) Modeling complex environmental data. IEEE Transactions on Neuronal Networks 8(4):852-862
Sanders GE, Skärby L, Ashmore MR, Fuhrer J (1995) Establishing critical levels for the effects of air pollution on vegetation. Water Air and Soil Pollution 85:189-200
Simpson R, Williams R, Ellis R, Culverhouse PF (1992) Biological pattern recognition by neuronal networks. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 79:303-308
Tan SS, Smeins FE (1996) Predicting grassland community changes with an artificial neuronal-network model. Ecol Model 84(1-3):91-97
Timofei S, Kurunczi L, Suzuki T, Fabian WMF, Muresan S (1997) Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Neuronal Network (NN) calculations of some disazo dye adsorption on cellulose. Dyes and Pigments 34(3):181-193
Urquidimacdonald M, Macdonald DD (1994) Performance comparison between a statistical model, a deterministic model, and an artificial neuronal-network model for predicting damage from pitting corrosion. Journal of Research of The National Institute of Standards and Technology 99(4):495-504
Weiser G, Havranek WM (1995) Environmental control of ozone uptake in Larix decidua Mill.: a comparison between different altitudes. Tree Physiology 15:253-258
Wise BM, Holt BR, Gallagher NB, Lee S (1995) A comparison of neuronal networks, non-linear biased regression and a genetic algorithm for dynamic model identification. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 30(1):81-89
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ball, G.R., Palmer-Brown, D., Mills, G.E. (2000). A Comparison of Artificial Neuronal Network and Conventional Statistical Techniques for Analysing Environmental Data. In: Lek, S., Guégan, JF. (eds) Artificial Neuronal Networks. Environmental Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57030-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57030-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63116-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57030-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive