Skip to main content

Agents’ Heterogeneity, Aggregation, and Economic Fluctuations

  • Conference paper
Interaction and Market Structure

Abstract

We study the implications of agents’ heterogeneity for business cycle analysis with the help of a two dimensional non-linear dynamical system derived from a New Keynesian macroeconomic model with imperfect capital markets. In order to analyze the interaction between real and financial variables, we have focussed on the degree of financial fragility of the economy, as proxied by the ratio of corporate net worth to the stock of capital, that is the equity ratio. Our approach allows to analyze both fluctuations due to the impulse-propagation mechanism and self-sustaining endogenous cycles. In the former case, shocks transmitted and amplified by a propagation mechanism, which depends on the degree of agents’ heterogeneity. In the latter case self sustained business cycles are generated by the evolution over time of the distribution of heterogeneous agents, classified by the degree of financial fragility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agliari, A., Delli Gatti, D., Gallegati, M., Gardini, L. (1999), “Global Dynamics in a Nonlinear Model of the Equity Ratio”, Journal of Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, E.I. (1984), “A Further Empirical Investigation of the Bankruptcy Cost Question”, Journal of Finance, vol. 39, pp. 1067–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., Gertler, M. (1989), “Agency Costs, Net Worth and Business Auctuations”, American Economic Review, vol. 79, pp. 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., Gertler, M. (1990), “Financial Fragility and Economic Performance”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 105, pp. 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., Gilchrist, S.G. (1998), “The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Approach”, NBER working paper, 6455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero R.I. (1992), “A Fallacy of Composition”, American Economic Review, vol. 82, pp. 1279–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R., Engel, E., Haltiwanger, J. (1997), “Aggregate Employment Dynamics”, American Economic Review, vol. 87, pp 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavas, J.P. (1993), “On Aggregation and Its Implication for Aggregate Behaviour”, Ricerche Economiche, vol 47, pp 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D., ed. (1996), “Beyond Microfoundation”, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S.J., Haltinwanger, J.C. (1996), “Driving Forces and Employment Auctuations: New Evidence and Alternative Auctuations”, working paper NBER 5775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S.J., Haltinwanger, J.C., Schuh, S. (1996) “Job Creation and Destruction”, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (1994), “Complex Economic Dynamics”, Cambridge, MIT Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisemberg, B. (1961), “Aggregation of Utility Function”, Management Science, vol. 6, pp. 337–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. M. (1969), “The Existence of Production Function”, Econometrica, vol. 37, pp. 453–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. M. (1982), “Aggregate Production Function Revisited”, Review of Economics Statistics, vol. 49, pp. 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallegati, M., Stanca, L.M. (1999), “The Dynamic Relations between Financial Positions and Investment: Evidence from Company Account Data”, Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallegati, M., Kirman, A. P., eds. (1999), “Beyond the Representative Agent”, Adelshot, Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S.C. (1990), “Bankruptcy, Boards, Banks and Blockholder: Evidence on Changes in corporate Ownership and Control when Firms Default”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 27, pp.355–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.H., Malkiel, B.G. (1981), “Corporation Finance” in Aaron H.A. and Pechman J.A., eds., “How Taxes Affect Economic Behaviour”, Washington D.C., Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. (1953), “Community Preference Field”, Econometrica, vol. 21, pp. 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, J. M., (1993), “Behavioural heterogeneity and Cournot Oligopoly Equilibrium”, Ricerche Economiche, vol 47, pp 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, J. M. (1991), “Transformations of the Commodity Spaces, Behavioural Heterogeneity and the Aggregation Problem”, mimeo, CEPREMAP Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H. A. J. (1964), “The Aggregation in Economics Analysis”, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B.C., Stiglitz, JE. (1988), “Imperfect Information, Finance Constraints and Business Fluctuations”, in Kohn, M. and Tsiang, S.C., eds., “Finance Constraints, Expectations and Macroeconomics”, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B.C., Stiglitz, JE. (1993), “Financial Market Imperfections and Business Cycles”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, pp. 77–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. E., (1997), “The representative Agent in Macroeconomics”, London Routledege.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.N., Reishus, D. (1990), “Outside Directorship and Corporate Performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 27, 389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. P. (1992), “Whom or What Does The Representative Individual Represent”, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 6, pp 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyotaki, N., Moore, G. (1997), “Credit Cycles”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 105, pp.211–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leijonhufvud, A. (1981), “Information and Coordination”, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. W. (1947), “Introduction to a Theory of The internal Structure of Functional Relationship”, Econometrica, vol. 15, pp. 361–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.B., Plosser, J. B. (1983), “Real Business Cycles”, Journal of Political Economy, vol 91, pp. 39–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1975), “An Equilibrium Model of the Business Cycle”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, pp. 1113–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1977), “Understanding Business Cycles“, in D. Brunner, A. Meltzer, eds, “Stabilizations of the Domestic and International Economy”, Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920), “Principles of Economics”, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1993), “A framework for Aggregation Theory”, Ricerche Economiche, vol. 47, pp. 107–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, R.J, (1996), “Heterogeneity Aggregation and Meaningful Macroeconomics”, in D. Colander, ed, “Beyond Microfoundation”, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H.P. (1982), “Can “It” Happen Again? Essays on Instability and Finance”, Armonk N.Y., M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn R.J., (1985), “Aggregation in System Dynamics”, System Dynamic Review, vol.. 1, pp.111–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1992), “Methodological Issues and the New Keynesian Economics”, in A. Vercelli and N. Dimitri, eds., “Macroeconomics: A Survey of Research Strategies”, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 38–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, T. (1993), “Empirical Approaches to the Problem of Aggregation over Individuals”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 21, pp. 1827–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temin P., (1998), “The Causes of Americam Business Cycle: an Essay in Economic Historiography”, in “Beyond Shocks: What Causes Business Cycle”, Fuhrer JC. and S. Schuh, eds., Conference Series, N. 42, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pp. 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T., Lundbergh, S. (1998), “Modeling Economic High-Frequency Time Series with STAR-STGARCH Models”, SSFJEFI working paper n. 291, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1954), “Linear Aggregation of Economic Relation”, Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J. (1989), “The Corporate Bankruptcy Decision”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, pp.129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamowitz V., (1998), “Has the Business Cycle Been Abolished?”, Business Economics, vol. 33, pp. 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gatti, D.D., Gallegati, M., Palestrini, A. (2000). Agents’ Heterogeneity, Aggregation, and Economic Fluctuations. In: Gatti, D.D., Gallegati, M., Kirman, A. (eds) Interaction and Market Structure. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 484. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57005-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57005-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66979-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57005-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics