Zusammenfassung
Umweltschutz ist zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung geworden. In weniger als dreißig Jahren haben sich die Ansätze auf nationaler Ebene verändert: nach der Konzentration auf die Beseitigung alter Umweltprobleme und dem Versuch der Verhinderung neuer Probleme hat man den eingeschränkten Bereich des Umweltmanagement hinter sich gelassen und ist weiter gegangen: Im Mittelpunkt der Aufmerksamkeit steht jetzt das wesentlich weiter gefaßte und komplexere Thema des gesellschaftlichen und wirtschaftlichen Wandels. Die Herausforderung besteht nicht länger nur darin, soziale und wirtschaftliche Aktivitäten zu regeln. Es geht vielmehr darum, Institutionen und gesellschaftliche Beziehungen im Sinne langfristiger Nachhaltigkeit neu zu gestalten.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Andrews, R., 1997: United States, in: Jänicke, M/Weidner, H. (Hrsg), National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building, Berlin: 25–43.
Bardach, E./Kagan R., 1982: Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness, Philadelphia.
Beardsley, D./Davies, T./Hersh, R., 1997: Improving Environmental Management: What Works, What Doesn’t, in: Environment 39: 6–10; 28–35.
Bennet, C./Howlett, M., 1992: The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change, in: Policy Sciences 25: 275–294.
Burke, M., 1997: Environmental Taxes Gaining Ground in Europe, in: Environmental Science and Technology 31: 84A-86A.
Chertow, M./Esty, D., 1997: Thinking Ecologically: The Next Generation of Environmental Policy, New Haven.
Davies, T./Mazurek, J., 1998: Pollution Control in the United States: Evaluating the System. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Davies, J./Mazurek, J., 1996: Industry Incentives for Environmental Improvement: Evaluation of U.S. Federal Initiatives. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Dryzek, J., 1997: The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford.
Environmental Law Institute, 1998: Barriers to Environmental Technology Innovation and Use, Washington, D.C.
Fiorino, D., 1995: Making Environmental Policy, Los Angeles.
Fiorino, D., 1996: Toward a New System of Environmental Regulation: The Case for an Industry Sector Approach, in: Environmental Law 26: 457–488.
Glasbergen, P., 1996: Learning to Manage the Environment, in: Lafferty, W./Meadowcroft, J. (Hrsg), Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects: 175–193.
Gouldson, A./Murphy, J., 1998: Regulatory Realities: The Implementation and Impact of Industrial Environmental Regulation, London.
Hajer, M., 1995: The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford.
Heclo, H., 1974: Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance, New Haven.
Hemmelskamp, J., 1997: Environmental Policy Instruments and their Effects on Innovation. European Planning Studies 5:177–194.
Hockenstein, J./Robert, N./Whitehead, B., 1997: Crafting the Next Generation of Market-Based Environmental Tools, in: Environment 39:12–20; 30–33.
Irwin, F., 1992: An Integrated Framework for Preventing Pollution and Protecting the Environment, in: Environmental Law 22:1–76.
Jänicke, M.,1996: Democracy as a Condition for Policy Success: The Importance of Non Institutional Factors, in: Lafferty, W./Meado wcroft, J. (Hrsg), Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects, Cheltenhem: 71–85.
Jänicke, M./Jörgens, H., 1998: National Environmental Policy Planning in OECD Countries: Preliminary Lessons from Cross-National Comparisons, in: Environmental Politics, Vol.7, No.2, Sommer 1998: 27–54.
Jänicke, M./Weidner, H. (Hrsg),1997: National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building, Berlin.
Kagan, R., 1995: Adversarial Legalism and American Government, in: Marc, K./Levin, M. (Hrsg), The New Politics of Public Policy, Baltimore: 88–118.
Kooiman, J., 1993: Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics, and Diversity, in: Kooiman, J. (Hrsg), Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: 35–48.
Mank, B., 1998: The Environmental Protection Agency’s Project XL and Other Regulatory Reform Initiatives: The Need for Legislative Authorization, in: Ecology Law Quarterly 25: 1–88.
Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, Government of the Netherlands, 1998: The Environment and the Economy: Towards a Sustainable Economy.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA), 1997: Resolving the Environmental Policy Paradox: An Agenda for Congress, EPA, and the States, Washington, D.C.
Ochsner, M., 1998: Pollution Prevention: An Overview of Regulatory Incentives and Barriers, in: New York University Environmental Law Journal 3: 586–617.
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA)/United States Congress, 1995: Environmental Policy Tools: A User’s Guide, Washington, D.C.
Portney, P. (Hrsg), 1990: Public Policies for Environmental Protection. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
President’s Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD), 1996: Sustainable America: A New Consensus for Prosperity, Opportunity, and a Healthy Economy for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Ruckelshaus, W., 1998: Stepping Stones, in: Environmental Forum 15: 30–41.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1998a: The Changing Nature of Environmental and Public Health Protection: An Annual Report on Reinvention, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1997a: EPA Strategic Plan. Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1997b: New Directions: A Report on Regulatory Reinvention. Office of the Administrator, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1998b: Stakeholder Attitudes on the Barriers to Innovative Environmental Technologies. Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation, Washington, D.C.
U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO), 1997: Regulatory Reinvention: EPA’s Common Sense Initiative Needs an Improved Operating Framework and Progress Measures, Washington, D.C.
Van Vliet, M., 1993: Environmental Regulation of Business: Options and Constraints for Communicative Governance, in: Kooiman, J. (Hrsg), Modern Governance: 105–118.
Wallace, D., 1995: Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan, London.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Spinger-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fiorino, D.J. (2000). Umweltplanung und technologische Innovation: Eine Form des Politiklernens ?. In: Jänicke, M., Jörgens, H. (eds) Umweltplanung im internationalen Vergleich. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56953-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56953-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66707-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56953-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive