Skip to main content

Visualizing Interdependencies in Technical Design

  • Conference paper
Design for Configuration

Abstract

The control and understanding of complex design processes is an important issue in practice and theory. Recent research shows that documentation and analysis of technical interactions between design tasks (using Design Structure Matrices) gives a thorough understanding of the underlying complex structure of design processes. Generally, these studies are based on an existing set of design tasks and interactions and claim that understanding a design structure is particularly helpful to improve (future) design processes. However, we argue that this claim can not be demonstrated because current studies do not document technical cause and nature of interactions. This hampers an objective understanding of design structures of future design processes. In this paper we propose a taxonomy of technical interactions based on product architecture in order to obtain descriptive clarity and better understanding of cause and nature of technical interactions. This will help to better focus on coordination where it is most needed. Further it gives structural insight how to make significant changes in product architecture in order to improve future management and organization of technical product development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wheelwright, S., & Clark, K.B. (1992) Revolutionizing Product Development (1 ed.). New-York: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (2 ed.). London: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, R.G. (1993) Winning at New products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch (1 ed.). Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ettlie, J.E. Product-process Development Integration in Manufacturing. In Management Science, Vol. 41, N 7,1995. pp. 1224–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gell-Mann, M. What is Complexity. In Complexity, Vol. 1, N 1, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, P. Complexity Theory and Organization Science. In Organization Science, Vol. 10, N 3, 1999, pp. 216–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon, H.A. (1981) The Science of the Artificial Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orton, J.D., & Weick, KE. Loosely Coupled Systems:A Reconceptualization. In Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, N 2,1990. pp. 203–223

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in Action New-York: McGraw Hill

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galbraith, J.R (1973) Designing Complex Organizations Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  11. Von Hippel, E. Task Partitioning: An Innovation Process Variable. In Research Policy, Vol. 19,1990, pp. 407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steward, D.V. The design structure system: a method Jor managing the design oJ complex systems. In IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 28, N 3, 1981. pp. 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, R.P., & Eppinger, S.D. Identifying Controlling Features oJ engineering Design Iteration. In Management Science, Vol. 43, N 3, 1997. pp. 276–293

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, R.P., & Eppinger, S.D. A Predictive Model oJ Sequential Iteration in Engineering Design. In Management Science, Vol. 43, N 8, 1997. pp. 1104–1120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, R.P., & Eppinger, S.D. Deciding between Sequential and Concurrent Tasks in Engineering Design. In Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 6, N 1, 1998. pp. 15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, R.P., & Morrow, J.A. Product Development Process Modeling. In Design Studies, Vol. 20, N 3, 1999, pp. 237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCord, K.R, & Eppinger, S.D. Managing the Integration Problem in Concurrent Engineering. In Working Paper MIT Sloan school of Management, Vol. 3594, 1993 pp. 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wood, RE. Task Complexity: Definition of the Construct. In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 37, 1986. pp. 60–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gulati, R.K, & Eppinger, S.D. The Coupling oJ Product Architecture and Organizational Structure Decisions (1996). Anonymous. Sloan Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: MIT. 3906

    Google Scholar 

  20. Staudenmayer, N. Webs of interdependency: strategies Jor managing multiple interdependencies in new product development. In Proceedings of the EIASM 6 th international product development conference 99 A.D. Cambridge U.K: University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing. 989–1007

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Tabrizi, B.N. Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry. In Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, 1995. pp. 84–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ulrich, K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. In Research Policy, Vol. 24, 1995 pp. 419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Erixon, G. (1998). Modular Function Deployment- A Method for Product Modularisation. Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ulrich, K. (1991). Fundamentals of product modularity. Issues in Design Manufacturing Integration ASME, 39

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sanchez, R. Product and process architectures in the management of knowledge resources (1999). Anonymous. Working Paper. Lausanne Switzerland: International Institute for Management Development. IMD 99–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henderson, R.M., & Clark, K.B. Architectual Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. In Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 1990 pp. 9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman. In Research Policy, Vol. 24, 1995 pp. 761–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Whitney, D.E. Why Mechanical Design cannot be like VLSI Design. In http://web.mit.edufctpidlwww/whitney/morepapers/design. pdf, Vol. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  29. Albano, L.D., & Suh, N.P. Axiomatic Approach t0 Structural Design. In Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 4,1992 pp. 171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pimmler, T.U., & Eppinger, S.D. (1994). Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions. In ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference 0 AD Minneapolis: 343–351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oosterman, B., Gaalman, G., Kuijpers, F. (2001). Visualizing Interdependencies in Technical Design. In: Riitahuhta, A., Pulkkinen, A. (eds) Design for Configuration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56905-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56905-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63211-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56905-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics