Skip to main content

Disaggregating Data: From Groups to Individuals

  • Chapter
Evaluating Critical Care

Part of the book series: Update in Intensive Care Medicine ((UICMSOFT,volume 35))

  • 159 Accesses

The literature relating to intensive care outcomes and health services research, in particular using scoring systems to assess severity of illness, has expanded rapidly in the past ten years. Indeed, assessment of severity of illness has been a corner-stone in this process, helping us to understand, and thus to describe, on an international basis the types of patient we are treating in the intensive care unit (ICU). Scoring systems such as the acute physiology, and chronic health evaluation (APACHE, three successive generations) [1, 2], the mortality probability model (MPM) [3] and the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS, I and II) [4, 5], were initially proposed to describe severity of illness and predict the mortality of groups of patients and not to predict the prognosis of a given individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP et al (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med, 13: 818–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J et al (1993) Mortality probability models (MPMII) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA, 270: 2478–2486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Alperovitch A et al (1984) A simplified acute physiological score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 12: 975–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow St, Saulnier F et al (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270: 2957–2963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR (1988) Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med 16: 1110–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shann F, Pearson G, Slater A, Wilkinson K (1997) Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 23:201–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous (1993) The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. The International Neonatal Network. Lancet 342:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) Prognosis in acute organ-system failure. Ann Surg 202:685–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV et al (1995) Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable predictor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 23:1638–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22: 707–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Gall JR, Klar J, Lemeshow S et al (1996) The logistic organ dysfunction system. JAMA 276: 802–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmerman JE, Shortell SM, Knaus WA et al (1993) Value and cost of teaching hospitals: a prospective, multicenter, inception cohort study. Crit Care Med, 21:1432–1442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE et al (1993) Variations in mortality and length of stay in intensive care units. Ann Intern Med 118: 753–761

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmerman JE, Shortell SM, Rousseau DM et al (1993) Improving intensive care: observations based on organizational case studies in nine intensive care units: a prospective, multi-center study. Crit Care Med 21:1443–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Change RWS, Jacobs S, Lee B (1988) Predicting outcome among intensive care unit patients using computerized trend analysis of daily APACHE II scores corrected for organ system failure. Intensive Care Med 1988,14: 558–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D et al (1994) Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 and 72 hours: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 22:1351–1358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruttimann UE, Pollack MM (1991) Objective assessment of changing mortality risks in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 19: 474–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner DP, Knaus WA, Harreil FE et al (1994) Daily prognostic estimates for critically ill adults in intensive care units: results from a prospective, multicenter, inception cohort analysis. Crit Care Med 22:1359–1372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J et al (1995) Incidence, risk factors and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. JAMA 274: 968–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cowen JS, Kelley MA (1994) Errors and bias in using predictive scoring systems. Crit Care Clin 10: 53–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kollef MH, Schuster DP (1994) Predicting intensive care unit outcome with scoring systems: underlying concepts and principles. Crit Care Med 10:1–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Le Gall JR and Loirat P (1995) Can we evaluate the performance of an intensive care unit ? Curr Opin Crit Care 1: 219–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D (1995) Outcome prediction for individual care patients: useful, misused, or abused ? Intensive Care Med 21: 770–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Randolph AG, Guyatt GH, Carlet J et al (1998) Understanding articles comparing outcomes among intensive care units to rate quality of care. Crit Care Med 26: 773–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Naylor C, Guyatt G, for the Evidence Based Medicine Group (1996) Users’ guides to the medical literature: part 10. How to use an article reporting variations in the outcomes of health services. JAMA 275: 554–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Leleu G, Klar J et al (1995) Customized probability models for early severe sepsis in adult intensive care patients. JAMA 273: 644–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Randolph AG, Guyatt GH, Calvin J et al (1998) Understanding articles describing clinical prediction tools. Crit Care Med 26:1603–1612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Teres D, Lemeshow S (1994) Why severity models should be used with caution. Crit Care Clin 10: 93–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vassar MJ, Holcroft JW (1994) The case against using the APACHE system to predict intensive care unit outcome in trauma patients. Crit Care Clin 10:117–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Watts CM, Knaus WA (1994) Comment on “the case against using the APACHE system to predict intensive care unit outcome in trauma patients”. Crit Care Clin 10:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  32. Castella X, Artigas A, Bion J et al (1995) A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group. Crit Care Med 23:1327–1335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gemke R, Bonsel G, Group ATP (1995) Comparative assessment of pediatric intensive care: a national multicenter study. Crit Care Med 23: 238–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rapaport J, Teres D, Barnett R et al (1995) A comparison of intensive care unit utilization in Alberta and western Massachusetts. Crit Care Med 23:1336–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams J, Zimmerman J, Wagner D et al (1995) African-American and white patients admitted in the intensive care units. Crit Care Med 23: 626–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wong D, Crofts S, Gomez M et al (1995) Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 23:1177–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pappachan JV, Millar B, Bennett ED et al (1999) Comparison of outcome from intensive care admission after adjustment for case mix by the APACHE III prognostic system. Chest 115: 802–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Randall Curtis J (1998) The “patient-centered” outcomes of critical care: what are they and how should they be used ? New Horiz 6: 26–32

    Google Scholar 

  39. Consensus Conference organized by the ESICM and the SRLF (1994) Predicting outcome in ICU patient. Intensive Care Med 20: 390–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sprung CL, Geber D, Eidelman LA et al (1999) Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission. Crit Care Med 27:1073–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Carlet J (1996) Quality assessment of intensive care units. Curr Opin in Crit Care 2: 319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thijs LG and the members of the task force European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (1997) Continuous quality improvement in the ICU: general guidelines. Intensive Care Med 23:125–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. The Quality Indicator Study Group (1995) An approach to the evaluation of quality indicators of the outcome of care in hospitalized patients, with a focus on nosocomial infection indicators. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 16: 308–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System Group (1991) Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: Limitations and possible solutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 12: 609–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vincent J, Bihari D, Suter P (1995) The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: results of the European Prevalence of Infection on Intensive Care (EPIC) study. JAMA 274:639–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Girou E, Stephan F, Novara A et al (1998) Risk factors and outcome of nosocomial infections: results of a matched case-control study in ICU patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157: 1151–1158

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Soufir L, Timsit JF, Make C et al (1999) Attributable mortality and morbidity of catheter-related septicaemia in critically ill patients: a matched, risk-ajusted, cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epid 20: 396–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Atkinson S, Bihari D, Smithies M, Daly K Mason R, McColl I (1994) Identification of futility in intensive care. Lancet 344: 1203–1206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (1997): Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med 26: 887-891

    Google Scholar 

  50. Halevy A (1999) Severity of illness scales and medical futility. Curr Opin Crit Care 5: 173–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sachdeva R, Jefferson L, Coss-Bu J, brody B (1996) Resource consumption and the extent of futile care among patients in a pediatric intensive care unit setting. J Pediatr 128: 742–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR (1990) Medical futility. Ann Int Med 112: 949–954

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Halevy A, Neal R, Brody B (1996) The low frequency of utility in an adult intensive care unit. Arch Intern Med 156:100–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Teres D (1997) Pushing the envelope of futility. Crit Care Med 25:1768–1769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Moreno R, Miranda DR, Fidler V et al (1998) Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database. Crit Care Med 26: 50–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Iezzoni LI, ASH AS, Shwartz M et al (1995) Predicting who dies depends on how severity is measured: implications for evaluating patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 123: 763–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators (1995): a controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. JAMA 274:1591–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Esserman L, Belkora J, Lenert L (1995) Potentially ineffective care: a new outcome to assess the limits of critical care. JAMA 274:1544–1551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al (1994) Improving intensive care unit discharge decisions: supplementing physician judgment with predictions of next day risk for life support. Crit Care Med 22:1373–1384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Auriant I, Vinatier I, Thaler F et al (1998) Simplified acute physiology score II for measuring severity of illness in intermediate care units. Crit Care Med 26:1368–1371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gemke R (1998) Clinical applications of severity scoring models. Curr Opin Crit Care 4: 133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlet, J., Montuclard, L., Garrouste-Orgeas, M. (2002). Disaggregating Data: From Groups to Individuals. In: Sibbald, W.J., Bion, J.F. (eds) Evaluating Critical Care. Update in Intensive Care Medicine, vol 35. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56719-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56719-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42606-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56719-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics