Skip to main content

PCR Policing: A Comparison of Fuzzy Policers Versus GCRA

  • Conference paper
Book cover Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS)

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

Any Call Admission Control algorithm and any Network Dimensioning depend on the reliability of the chosen Usage Parameter Control algorithm. The standardized ATM Usage Parameter Control algorithm is the GCRA. An ideal ATM PCR policer should guarantee a very low cell loss probability (10-9) for the cells of a well-behaved user and police contract violation as rigidly as possible. All this independently of the characteristics of the monitored stream and of the background traffic. In this paper we compare the selectivity performance and the dynamic behaviour of the GCRA to those of one of the most famous Fuzzy Policers. This, in a realistic scenario: the PCR policing of a video stream passing through an ATM multiplexer, with a self-similar background traffic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Ahmad, Next Generation of Broadband Network Architectures-Traffic Flow Control and End-to-End Performance, IFIP ATM ’98, 20th-22nd July 1998, Craiglands Hotel, Ilkley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Ascia, V. Catania, A VLSI parallel architecture for fuzzy expert systems, Int. J. Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9, no. 2, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Atlasis, G. Stassinopulos, A. Vasilakos, Leaky bucket mechanism with learning algorithm for ATM traffic policing, IEEE Symp. on Comp. and Commun. - Proc. 1997. IEEE Los Alamitos, CA, pp 68–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. ATM Forum, Traffic Management Specification, Version 4.0, af-tm-0056.000, April 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Bao, S. Cheng, Parameter adaptation mechanism for ATM traffic policing, Chinese Journal of Eectronics, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Battaglia, Z. Bažanowski, U. Killat Dimensioning GCRA Parameters to Fairly Police a CBR Stream Passing an ATM Multiplexer Equipped with a Traffic Shaper, Proceedings IFIP ATM ’98, 20th–22nd July 1998, Ilkley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Battaglia, U. Killat QoS of IP over ATM: The PCR and ACR Policing Issue, IEEE IWS ’99, 18th–20th Feb. 1999, Osaka University Convention Center, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Battaglia, U. Killat How to Dimension two Sets of GCRA Parameters to Fairly Police PCR and SCR of Connections Passing an ATM Multiplexer, AEU, International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 53 (1999) No. 3, 129–134, Urban & Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Battaglia, U. Killat On the PCR Policing of an Arbitrary Stream Passing Through a Private ATM Network Before Reaching the Public UNI, IFIP TC 6 Fifth Int. Conf. on Broadband Communications ’99, 10th–12th Nov. 1999, Hong Kong, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Battaglia, U. Killat How to Police the PCR of an ATM Stream Passing Through a Fair Queueing Scheduler Before Entering the UNI, Eigth International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Modeling and Analysis, 9th–12th March 2000, Nashville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Boyer, F.M. Guillemin, M.J. Servel, J.P. Coudreuse Spacing Cells Protects and Enhances Utilization of ATM Network Links, IEEE Network Magazine, Vol. 6, No. 5, September 1992, pp 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Castelli, A. Forcina, A. Tonietti Dimensioning Criteria for Policing Functions in ATM Networks, INFOCOM ’92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Catania, G. Ficili, S. Palazzo, D. Panno, A fuzzy decision maker for source traffic control in high speed networks, Proc. 1995 Int. Conf. on Network Protocols (ICNP 95), Tokyo, Nov. 7–10, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Catania, G. Ficili, S. Palazzo, D. Panno, A fuzzy expert system for Usage Parameter Control in ATM networks, Proc. GLOBECOM ’95, Singapore, Nov. 13–17, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Catania, G. Ficili, S. Palazzo, D. Panno, A Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Versus Conventional Policing Mechanisms for ATM Networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 4, no. 3, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Douligeris and G. Develekos, A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Congestion Control in ATM Networks, Proc. IEEE ICC ’95, Seattle, WA, June 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss and J. Wroklawski, Assured Forwarding PHB Group, Internet Draft, January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Huebner, Dimensioning of a Peak Cell Rate Monitor Algorithm Using Discrete-Time Analysis, ITC 14 / J. Labetoulle and J.W. Roberts (Editors).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Jiang, Z. Liu Improved algorithm of usage parameter control in ATM networks, Int. Conf. on Commun. Tech. Proc, ICCT vol. 1, 1996. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 24–27.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Z. Jiang, Z. Liu Fuzzy leaky bucket for policing mechanism in ATM networks, Neural Networks for Signal Processing. Proc. IEEE Workshop 1996, Piscataway, NJ, pp 510–517.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Kang, B. Steyaert and C. Kim Service Separation in ATM Networks Using a Hardware Efficient Rate-Controlled Cell Multiplexer, ITC 16 Proceedings, Elsevier Science 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Mason, A. Pelletier, J. Lapointe Toward optimal policing in ATM networks, Computer Communications, vol. 19, no. 3, Mar 1996, pp 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. O. Onvural, Asyncronous Transfer Mode Networks: Performance Issues, Norwood, MA: Artech House, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. P. Rathgeb, Modeling and Performance Comparison of Policing Mechanisms for ATM Networks, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 325–334, Apr. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. K. Ryu, S. B. Lowen, Point Process Approach to the Modelling and Analysis of Self-Similar Traffic: Part I - Model Construction, in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM’96, San Francisco, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. K. Ryu, Fractal Network Traffic: From Understanding to Implications, PhD Thesis, Columbia University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Sairamesh and N. Shroff, Limitations and pitfalls of leaky bucket, a study with video traffic, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Networks, Sept. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Tarraf, I. Ibrahim, and T. Saadawi, A novel neural network traffic enforcement mechanism for ATM networks, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1088–1096, Aug. 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Battaglia, L., Guardado, F., Killat, U. (2001). PCR Policing: A Comparison of Fuzzy Policers Versus GCRA. In: Killat, U., Lamersdorf, W. (eds) Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS). Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56675-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56675-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41645-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56675-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics