Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper solves the equilibrium bid functions of third — and lower — price auctions. In these auctions, equilibrium bids exceed bidders’ valuations, and bidders raise their bids if one moves to a lower price auction, and lower bids if the number of bidders is increased. Third— and lower—price auctions are unappealing under risk aversion, which in turn may make them appealing when the auction is a substitute for small scale gambling, as in many Internet auctions. Moreover, in the presence of a corrupt agent-auctioneer, an auction may turn out to be third — or lower—price, even though it was set up as a second-price or hybrid English auction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 65.84
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, B. C., Balakrishnan, N. and Nagaraja, H. N. (1992) A First Course in Order Statistics. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, M. and Bergstrom, T. (1989) Log—concave probability and its applications. Working Paper. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A. (1970) Order Statistics. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. H. and Levin, D. (1993) Independent private value auctions: bidder behavior in first—, second—, and third—price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Economic Journal 103, 868–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengwiler, Y. and Wolfstetter, E. (2000) Auctions and corruption. Working Paper, SFB 373. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monderer, D. and Tennenholtz, M. (1999) Internet auctions — are they gamblers’ attraction? Working Paper. Technion, Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1981) Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. G. and Samuelson, W. F. (1981) Optimal auctions. American Economic Review 71, 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter, E. (1995) Third— and lower-price auctions. Discussion Paper, SFB 373. Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter, E. (1999) Topics in Microeconomics: Industrial Organization, Auctions, and Incentives. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolfstetter, E. (2001). Third — and Lower — Price Auctions. In: Berninghaus, S.K., Braulke, M. (eds) Beiträge zur Mikro- und zur Makroökonomik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56606-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56606-6_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62679-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56606-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics