Abstract
The proposition that history matters is not new in the economic debate, but growing recognition that technological change matters for economic growth has renewed and rephrased that proposition in more formal if narrower terms. Rosenberg, Paul David and Brian Arthur are names associated with path-dependence. Ebeling et alit used Markov processes as a random walk, and de Araújo used a birth-and-death model as a stochastic equivalent of a diffusion equation for finite markets. The present paper further explores this line, with new results. By examining similarities and differences between the author’s results and those of others, we try to discern the implications of these assumptions for the results obtained on technology diffusion, and raise a few questions on the significance of stable equilibrium for analytic purposes. Finally, we discuss extensions to incorporate insights from other work aiming to arrive at a better understanding of the real processes of technology innovation and diffusion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arthur, W.B. (1989), Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical EventsThe Economic Journal99, pp 116–131
Arthur, W.B., Ermoliev, Yu. and Kaniovski, Yu. (1987), Path-Dependent Processes and the Emergence of Macro-Structure;European Journal of Operational Research30, pp 294–303
Bruckner, E., Ebeling, W., JimÉnez MontaÑo, M. A., & Scharnhorst, A. (1994),Hyperselection and Innovation Described by a Stochastic Model of Technological Evolution, in Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory, L. Leydesdorff and P. Van den Besselaar, eds., Pinter, London.
Cameron, H.M. & Metcalfe, J.S. (1987), On the Economics of Technological SubstitutionTechnological Forecasting and Social Change32, pp 147–162
De Araujo, J. L. (1997), “Difusâo de tecnologias e equilibrios dependentes de trajetórias”Revista de Economia Contemporânea1(3).
De AraÚjo, J. L. (1995), “Are technology diffusion processes inherently historical?”Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeApril
Debresson, C.; Sirilli, G.; Hu, X.; and Kwan Lux, F. (1994), “Structure and location of innovative activity in the Italian economy, 1981–85”Economic Systems Research6(2)
JimÉnez MontaÑo, M. A., and Ebeling, W. (1980), A Stochastic Model of Technological ChangeCollective Phenomena3, 107–114
Krugman, P. (1994), Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations, W. W. Norton and Company, New York and London
Rosenberg, N. (1994), Exploring the black box: Technology, economics and history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK
Ross, S. M. (1983), Stochastic Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lizardo, J., De Araújo, R.H. (2001). Technology Diffusion, Stability and Decay: some Results. In: Kirman, A., Zimmermann, JB. (eds) Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 503. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42209-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56472-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive