Skip to main content

Cooperation, Adaptation and the Emergence of Leadership

  • Conference paper
Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents

Abstract

A generic property of biological, social and economical networks is their ability to evolve in time, creating and suppressing interactions. We approach this issue within the framework of an adaptive network of agents playing a Prisoner’s Dilemma game, where each agent plays with its local neighbors, collects an aggregate payoff and imitates the strategy of its best neighbor. We allow the agents to adapt their local neighborhood according to their satisfaction level and the strategy played. We show that a steady state is reached, where the strategy and network configurations remain stationary. While the fraction of cooperative agents is high in these states, their average payoff is lower than the one attained by the defectors. The system self-organizes in such a way that the structure of links in the network is quite inhomogeneous, revealing the occurrence of cooperator “leaders” with a very high connectivity, which guarantee that global cooperation can be sustained in the whole network. Perturbing the leaders produces drastic changes of the network, leading toglobal dynamical cascades.These cascades induce a transient oscillation in the population of agents between the nearly all-defectors state and the all-cooperators outcome, before setting again in a state of high global cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Ashlock, M. D. Smucker, and L. Tesfatsion. Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner’s Dilemma.BioSystems37(1–2):99–125, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. AxelrodThe Evolution of Cooperation.Basic Books, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Axelrod and W. D. Hamilton. The evolution of cooperation.Science211:1390–1396, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Cohen, R. Riolo, and R. Axelrod. The emergence of social organization in the prisoner’s dilemma: how context-preservation and other factors promote cooperation. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 99–01–002, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Goyal and S. Joshi. Networks of collaboration in oligopoly. Mimeo, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. A. Huberman and N. S. Glance. Evolutionary games and computer simulations.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA90:7716–7718, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. O. Jackson and A. Watts. The evolution of social and economic networks. Vanderbilt University, Mimeo, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O. Kirchkamp. Spatial evolution of automata in the prisoners’ dilemma. Discussion Paper B-330, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Mimeo, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Kirman. Aggregate activity and economic organisation.Revue Economique des sciences sociales113:189–230, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Lindgren. Evolutionary dynamics in game-theoretic models. In Durlauf, Arthur and Lane, editorsThe Economy as an Evolving Complex System IIvolume XXVII, pages 337–367. SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Lindgren and M. G. Nordahl. Evolutionary dynamics of spatial games.Physica D75:292–309, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Mukherji, V. Rajan, and J. R. Slagle. Robustness of cooperation.Nature379:125–126, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. A. Nowak, S. Bonhoeffer, and R. M. May. Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91:4877–4881, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos.Nature359:826–829, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May. The spatial dilemmas of evolution.Int. Jour. of Bif. and Chaos3(1):35–78, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Watts. A dynamic model of network formation. Vanderbilt University, Mimeo, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of small-world networks.Nature393:440–442, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Weibull. Evolutionary Game Theory.MIT University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. G. Zimmermann, V. M. Eguluz, M. San Miguel, and A. Spadaro. Cooperation in an Adaptive Network. In Ballot and Weisbuch, editorsApplications of Simulation to Social SciencesHermes Science Publications (Paris, France), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zimmermann, M.G., Eguíluz, V.M., Miguel, M.S. (2001). Cooperation, Adaptation and the Emergence of Leadership. In: Kirman, A., Zimmermann, JB. (eds) Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 503. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42209-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56472-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics