Skip to main content

Organisational Innovation, Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities: the Case of Linux

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 503))

Abstract

A growing number of works in the literature consider the process of production and circulation of knowledge within the firm as is the key determinant of the capability of the organisation to innovate Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995; Leonard-Barton, 1995; von Krogh, Roos and Kleine, 1998, etc…). It is widely agreed that the “cognitive architecture” of knowledge within the firm (the way knowledge is produced, stored, exchanged, transmitted, retrieved) strongly influences the process of organisational learning, and in turn the innovative process. As Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) emphasised, the process of creation of knowledge within firms relies on two main dimensions; the first one is the “epistemological dimension”: the critical assumption is that human knowledge is created and expanded through social interaction between tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge (“knowledge conversion”); the second one is the “ontological dimension” which is concerned with the levels of knowledge creating entities (individual, group, organisational and inter-organisational). In line with the assumptions initially made by Argyris and Schön (1978), the organisation supports creative individuals or provides contexts for them to create knowledge.“Organizational knowledge creation therefore should be understood as a process that organizationally amplifies the knowledge created by individuals and crystallizes it as a part of the knowledge network of the organization. This process takes place within an ”expanding community of interaction“ which crosses intra and inter-organizational levels and boundaries”Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995. emphasised, the process of creation of knowledge within f1rms relies on two main dimensions; the first one is the “epistemological dimension”: the critical assumption is that human knowledge is created and expanded through social interaction between tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge (“knowledge conversion”); the second one is the “ontological dimension” which is concerned with the levels of knowledge creating entities (individual, group, organisational and inter-organisational). In line with the assumptions initially made by Argyris and Schön (1978), the organisation supports creative individuals or provides contexts for them to create knowledge.“Organizational knowledge creation, therefore, should be understood as a process that organizationally amplifies the knowledge created by individuals and crystallizes it as a part ofthe knowledge network of the organization. This process takes place within an ”expanding community of

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler E, Haas P (1992) Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Programme In: International Organisation, vol 46, n°1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organisational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber B (1952) Science and the Social Order. Glencoe, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard P (1999) Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyssade C (1998) Sens et savoir: Des communautés épistémiques dans le discours. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler F, McDonald S (2000) Power, Mastery and Organizational Learning. Journal of Management Studies, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation. In: Organization Science, Vol. 2, n°1, pp 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1998) Organizing Knowledge. In: California Management Review Vol. 40, n°3, pp 90–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusoni S, Pavitt K, Prencipe A (2000) Knowledge specialisation and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they do ?. Paper presented at the conference Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD (1977) The Visible Hand: the Managerial Revolution in American Business. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough W, Teece D (1996) When is Virtual Virtuous ? Organizing for Innovation. In: Harvard Business Review, January-February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet P, Llerena P (1999) La conception de la firme comme processeur de connaissance. In: Revue dEconomie Industrielle, n°88, 2° tri., pp 211–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SDN, Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, vol 10, n°4, pp 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R, Foray D (1997) The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge. In: Industrial and Corporate Change, vol 6 (3), pp 594–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R, David P, Foray D (1998) The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness. Mimeo TIPIK project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curien N (1992) Economie et Management des Entreprises Réseaux. In: ENSPTT, Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang-Nguyen J, Penard IT (1999) Don et cooperation dans internet: une nouvelle economic? In: Terminal n° 80/81, Les logiciels libres: de I’utopie au marche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibiaggio L (1998) Information, Connaissance et Organisation. Thèse de doctorat, université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibiaggio L (1999) Apprentissage, Coordination et Organisation de l’Industrie. Une Perspective Cognitive. In: Revue d’Economie Industrielle, n°88, pp 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson G (1994) The Theory of the Firm and the Theory of Economic Growth. In Magnusson L (eds) Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian approaches to Economics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray D, Lundvall BA (1997) The Learning Economy. Implications on Innovation, Growth and Employment. In: Guilhon B et al., Economie de la Connaissance et Organisations, L’Harmattan, Paris, pp 16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giard V, Midler C (1993) Pilotages de Projet et Entreprises — Diversités et Convergences. In: ECOSIP, Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Scwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas P (1992) Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. In: International Organization, vol 46, n°1, pp 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff A (1990) Mapping Strategic Thought. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien N (1999) Linux: la convergence du monde Unix et du monde PC. In: Terminal n° 80/81, Les logiciels libre: de l’utopie au marché.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao J (1998) Organiser la créativité. Village Mondial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina K (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge, An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Turcanu A (1992) Distributed Knowledge in Software Development: The Emergence of E-Innovation. Working Draft Presented at theCondor seminar, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lain A (1999) Tacit Knowledge, Organisational Learning and Societal institutions. Working paper, University of Kent, Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger EC (1990) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral PartIcipation. Cambridge University Press New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D (1995) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesourne J (1991) Economie de l’ordre et du désordre. Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall BA (1992) (ed) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Cohendet, F. Creplet, O. Dupouët

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall BA (2000) Unlocking Knowledge. Contribution to the OECD report on Knowledge and Society, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe S (1998) Innovation as a policy problem: new perspectives and old ones on the division of labour in the innovation process. In:MimeoCentre for Research on Innovation, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midler C (1996) L’auto qui n’existait pas. InterEditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. In: Organisation science, vol 5, n°1, pp 4–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Konno N (1998) The Concept of Ba: Building for Knowledge Creation. In: California Management Review, vol 40, n°3, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How the Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation. Oxford University Press New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R, Konno N (2000) SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. In: Long Range Planning 33, pp 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (1999) Inter-Firm Alliances. Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond E (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar. O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WM, Wenger EC (2000) Communities of Practice: the Organizational Frontier. In: Harvard Business Review, January February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmueller WE (2000) Will new information and communication technologies improve the codification of knowledge. In: Industrial and Corporate Change, vol 9, issue 2, pp 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel E (1988), The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.von Krogh, Roos and Kleine (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice; Learning as a Social System. In: Systems Thinker, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteneck D (1996) The Industrial Revolution and Birth of the Anti-Mercantilist Idea: Epistemic Communities and Global Leadership. In: Journal of World-Systems Research, vol 2, n°1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann JB (1999) Logiciel et propriété intellectuelle: du copyright au copyleft. In: Terminal n° 80/81, Les logiciels libres: de l’utopie au marché.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cohendet, P., Creplet, F., Dupouët, O. (2001). Organisational Innovation, Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities: the Case of Linux. In: Kirman, A., Zimmermann, JB. (eds) Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 503. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42209-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56472-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics