Skip to main content

Coalition Formation with Heterogeneous Agents

  • Conference paper
Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 503))

  • 212 Accesses

Abstract

The paper analyzes a game of coalition formation in which agents with limited computational abilities possess heterogeneous endowments and seek to coax lesce into groups to produce and divide an output. The basic game is modelled as a two stage game; in the first stage every agent sends other agents various messages consisting in the proposal of a coalition. In the second stage, knowing the coalitions, agents choose the actions to perform. We show that there exists at least a Strong Nash equilibrium characterized by the consecutive property, i.e. the richest agents form a coalition among themselves and so do the poorest agents. The numerical simulations show that agents play the SNE with high probability; moreover, the more unequal the initial distribution of resources, the lower the average utility in the economy. The transition paths highlight the fact that the rich agents are the first to coalesce, so that the inequality of individual utilities increases in the early periods and then decreases when poor agents also start coalescing. In contrast, average utility is generally increasing, so that there exists a non linear relationship between inequality and average utility.

A large part of coalition formation literature is interested in games with externality, see for example Yo (1997) and Thoron (1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R. (1967): A survey of Cooperative Games Without Side Payments. In: M. Shubik (Eds.): Essay in Mathematical Economics. Princeton University Press, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, E. (1985): Endogenous vs. Exogenous Coalition Formation. Economie Appliquee 38(3/4), 611–35.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernheim, B. D., B. Peleg and M. D. Whinston (1987): Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria: Concepts. Journal of Economic Theory 42(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birchenhall, C.R. (1996): Evolutionary Games and Genetic Algorithms. In: Gilli M. (Eds.): Computational Economic Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 323.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Block, F. (1996): Non-cooperative models of coalition formation in games with spillovers. In: C. Carraro and D. Siniscalco (Eds.): New directions in the economic theory of the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 311–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ecchia, G. and M. Mariotti (1998): Coalition formation in international environmental agreements and the role of institutions. European Economic Review 42, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farrell J. and Scotchmer S. (1988): Partnerships. Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiaschi, D., N. Garrido and P. M. Pacini (2001): Production Partnerships Formation with Heterogeneous Agents: a Simulation with SWARM. In: F. Luna and A. Perrone (Eds.): Agent-Based Methods in Economics and Finance: Simulations in Swarm. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galor, 0. and J. Zeira (1993): Income Distribution and Macroeconomics. Review of Economie Studies 60, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenberg, J. (1994): Coalitional Structures. In: R. J. Aumann and S. Hart (Eds.): Handbook of Game Theory. IL. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1305–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guesnerie, R. and C. Oddou (1988): Increasing Returns to Size and Their Limits. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 90, 259–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hart, S. and M. Kurz (1983): Endogenous Formation of Coalitions. Econometrica 52, 1047–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland, J.H., K.J. Holyoak, R.N. and P. Thagard (1986): Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Olson, M. (1983): The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridege Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thoron, S. (1998): Formation of a Coalition-Proof Stable Cartel. Canadian Journal of Economics 31(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yi S.-S. (1997): Stable Coalition Structures with Externality. Games And Economic Behavior 20, 201–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fiaschi, D., Pacini, P.M. (2001). Coalition Formation with Heterogeneous Agents. In: Kirman, A., Zimmermann, JB. (eds) Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 503. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56472-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42209-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56472-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics