Abstract
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-recognized yet serious complication in solid organ transplant recipients and currently represents the second most common de novo malignancy following solid organ transplantation. PTLD has been noted in all transplant immunosuppressive eras including the pre-cyclosporine, cyclosporine, and post-cyclosporine eras. The time from organ transplantation to PTLD presentation varies widely from less than 1 month to several years. PTLD presents with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations depending on the transplanted organ, immunosuppressive therapy and patient age. Intense immunosuppressive therapy is a major risk factor for development of PTLD. Whenever a new agent is introduced, there is a learning curve that leads to dosing modifications, which in turn result in optimization of its immunosuppressive efficacy and reduction of toxicities, including PTLD. We review the major historical and recent immunosuppression trials to assess the impact of individual immunosuppressive agents and regimens on PTLD risk.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brennan DC, Flavin K, Lowell JA et al. (1999) A randomized, double-blind comparison of thymoglobulin versus ATGAM for induction immunosuppressive therapy in adult renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 67:1011–1018
Calne RY, Rolles K, DJG White et al. (1979) Cyclosporine A: initially as the only immunosuppressant in 34 recipients of cadaveric organs: 32 kidneys, 2 pancreases and 2 livers. Lancet II:1033–1036
Canadian Multicenter Transplant Study Group (1983) A randomized clinical trial of cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 309:809–815
Davis CL, Wood BL, Sabath D E et al. (1998) Interferon alpha treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in recipients of solid organ transplants. Transplantation 66:1770–1779
European Multicenter Trial Group (1983). Cyclosporin in cadaveric renal transplantation: one-year follow-up of a multicenter triaL Lancet II:986–989
First MR, VR Peddi (1998) Malignancies complicating organ transplantation. Transplant Proc 30:2768–2770
Fukuda M, Aikawa I, Ohmori Y et al. (1987) Chromosome aberrations in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 19:2245–2246
Gaber AO, First MR, Tessi RJ et al. (1998) Results of the double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase III clinical trial of thymoglobulin versus Atgam in the treatment of acute graft rejection episodes after renal transplantation. Transplantation 66:29–37
Groth CG, Backman K, Morales JM et al. (1999) Sirolimus (rapamycin)-based therapy in human renal transplantation: similar efficacy and different toxicity compared with cyclosporine. Transplantation 67:1036–1042
Johnson C, Ahsan N, Gonwa T et al. (2000) Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetU versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation 69:834–841
Kahan BD (2000) Efficacy of siroMmus compared with azathioprine for reduction of acute renal allograft rejection: a randomized multicentre study. The Rapamune US Study Group. Lancet 356:194–202
Kreis H, Cisterne JM, Land W et al. (2000) SiroMmus in association with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 69:1252–1260
Legendre C, Kreis H (1992) Effect of immunosuppression on the incidence of lymphoma formation. Clin Transplant 6 (Special issue):220–222
Mathew T, for the Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group (1998) A blinded long-term, randomized multicenter study of mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 65: 1450–1454
Majewski M, Korecka M, Kossev P et aL (2000) The immunosuppressive macrolide RAD inhibits growth of human Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B lymphocytes in vitro and in vivo: a potential approach to prevention and treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4285–4290
Nalesnik MA (1997) Clinicopathologic features of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Ann Transplant 2:33–40
Nalesnik MA, Locker J, Jaffe R et al (1982) Experience with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 6 (Special issue):249–252
Nashan B, Moore R, Amlot P et al (1997) Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. Lancet 350:1193–1198
Nashan B, Light S, Hardie IR, Lin A, Johnson JR (1999) Reduction of acute renal allograft rejection by daclizumab. Transplantation 67:110–115
Penn I (1991) The changing pattern of post-transplant malignancies Transplant Proc 23:1101–1103
Penn I (1992) Immunosuppression: a contributory factor in lymphoma formation. Clin Transplant 6 (Special issue):214–219
Penn I (1996) Cancers in cyclosporine-treated vs azathioprine-treated patients. Transplant Proc 28:876–878
Penn I (2000) Post-transplant malignancy: the role of immunosuppression. Drug Safety 23:101–113
Penn I, Hammond W, Brettschnedier L, Starzl T (1969) Malignant lymphomas in transplant patients. Transplant Proc 1:106–112
Pirsch ID (1999) Cytomegalovirus infection and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in renal transplant recipients: results of the US multicenter FK 506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. Transplantation 68:1203–1205
Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH, Vincenti R Filo RS, for the FK 506 Kidney Transplant Study Group (1997) A comparison of tacrolimus (FK-506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 63:977–983
Ratkovec RM, O’Connell JB, Bristow MR et al. (1992) Po st-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in cardiac transplant patients receiving 0KT3 therapy. Clin Transplant 6 (Special issue):260–264
Shapiro R, Nalesnick M, McCauley J et al. (1999) Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in adult and pediatric renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Transplantation 68:1851–1854
Sollinger HW, for the US Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group (1995) Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute allograft rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 60:225–232
Swinnen LJ, Costanzo-Nordin MR, Fisher SG et al. (1990) Increased incidence of lymphoproEferative disorder after immunosuppression with the monoclonal antibody 0KT3 in cardiac transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 323:1723–1728
Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group (1996) A blinded randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 61:1029–1037
Wiesner RH (1998) A long-term comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine in liver transplantation: a report of the US FK506 Study Group. Transplantation 66:493–499
Vincenti F, Kirkman R, Light S, Bumgardner G et al. (1998) Interleukin-2-receptor blockade with daclizumab to prevent acute rejection in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 338:161–165
Younes BS, McDiarmid SV, Martin MG et al. (2000) The effect of immunosuppression on posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric Ever transplant patients. Transplantation 70:90–94
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Trofe, J., Buell, J.F., First, M.R., Hanaway, M.J., Beebe, T.M., Woodle, E.S. (2002). The Role of Immunosuppression in Lymphoma. In: Oertel, S.H., Riess, H. (eds) Immunosurveillance, Immunodeficiencies and Lymphoproliferations. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 159. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56352-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56352-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62676-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56352-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive