Skip to main content

Meteorology — GEO (Geosynchronous Earth Orbit) Missions

  • Chapter
Book cover Observation of the Earth and Its Environment

Abstract

Elektro-M-1 is the planned geostationary meteorological mission of Rosaviakosmos, a successor spacecraft to GOMS (also known as Elektro-1). The overall mission objectives are:

  • To provide multispectral imagery (hydro-meteorological data) of the atmosphere (including the cloud-covered sky) and of the Earth’s surface within the coverage region (visible disk) of the spacecraft

  • To collect heliospheric, ionospheric, and magnetospheric data

  • To provide the needed communication services for the transmission/exchange of all data with the ground segment

  • To provide the services of data collection for the DCPs (Data Collection Platforms) in the ground segment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The scant information provided by the Russian contact doesn’t permit a real description of the project

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Lawler, “Blast at Xichang Derails China’s Weather Effort”, Space News, May 2–8, 1994, p. 3

    Google Scholar 

  3. http://202.106.103.181/s-vissr.htm

    Google Scholar 

  4. http://202.106.103.181/

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Homma, M. Minowa, M. Kobayashi, M. Harada, “Geostationary Meteorological Satellite System in Japan” in ‘Monitoring Earth’s Ocean, Land, and Atmosphere from Space,’ Volume 97 AIAA, 1985, pp. 570–583

    Google Scholar 

  6. Information provided by T. Hiraki of JMA, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. P. Menzel, J. F. W. Purdom, “Introducing GOES-I: The first of a Generation of new Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 75 No. 5, May 1994, pp. 757–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Note: For a number of years the designation GOES Next (N) was used to identify the first of the satellites that would follow the GOES I-M series. It was also thought this GOES N would be the start of a totally new generation satellite series. However, during the time frame of about 1992–95, NOAA has come to realize that a new satellite series would take at least a decade to develop, manufacture, and launch. This new situation made NOAA realize it would need a few more clones of the current GOES I-M series to maintain continuity of GOES service prior to the GOES Next being available. What has evolved is a program that will likely buy 3–4 additional GOES I-M satellites beyond the GOES I-M series. These would then be labeled GOES N through Q. GOES R would be the first of a new generation of three-axis stabilized satellites. (Information: R. Heymann of NOAA).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. P. Mercanti, “Need for Expanded Environmental Measurement Capabilities in Geosynchronous Earth Orbit,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment, ERIM, Volume I, pp. 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Koffler, L. Spayd, “30 Years of Operational Environmental Satellites: A Retrospective and Future View of the United States Program,” presented at the Twenty-Third International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment, Bangkok, Thailand, April 18–25, 1990, pp. 95–97

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.R. Greaves, W.E. Shenk, ‘The Development of the Geosynchronous Weather Satellite System,’ in Monitoring Earth’s Ocean, Land, and Atmosphere from Space, Volume 97, 1985, pp. 150–181

    Google Scholar 

  12. Space Sensors, brochure of Hughes Santa Barbara Research Center (SBRC), January 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. “The Geostationary Operational Satellite Data Collection System,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS 2, June 1983

    Google Scholar 

  14. “Users Guide for Random Reporting — An Introduction to GOES Random Reporting Services,” NOAA, April 1985

    Google Scholar 

  15. User Interface Manual, Version 1.1, for the ‘Data Collection System Automatic Processing System (DAPS),’ Integral Systems Inc., Sept. 1990

    Google Scholar 

  16. Information provided by M. J. Nestlebush of NOAA/NESDIS

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Savides, “Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite GOES I-M,” System Description, Space Systems/Loral, Palo Alto, CA, Dec. 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. “The GOES I-M Series Satellites — A brief description and Status Report,” NOAA draft paper, March 1993

    Google Scholar 

  19. http://rsd.gsfc.nasa.gov/goes/text/goes.databook.html

  20. “GOES I-M Data Book” by Space Systems/Loral

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. A. Hursen, et al., “The GOES Imager: overview and evolutionary development,” SPIE, Vol. 2812, pp.160–473, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  22. Note: Image navigation refers to the determination of the location of a pixel within an image in terms of Earth’s longitude and latitude; registration refers to stability of maintaining pointing of each pixel to a specific Earth location within an image and between repeated images.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. J. Nestlebush, “The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite Data Collection System,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS 40, June 1994

    Google Scholar 

  24. ”GOES Advanced Baseline Imager, Technical Requirements Document,” GSFC, S-415–200, March 2000

    Google Scholar 

  25. http://thunder.msfc.nasa.gov/lms/

  26. “Space System with Geostationary Meteorological Satellite (GOMS),” Paper of Planeta, Moscow, Nov. 1990

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. A. Stoma, Yu. V. Trifonov, “Geostationary Space System ‘ELECTRO’ (GOMS): Preconditions for Creation and Structure,” Space Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1995, pp. 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  28. O. M. Miroshnik, et. al., “A Drama in Orbit with a Happy Ending,” Space Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1995, pp. 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yu. V. Trifonov, “S/C ELECTRO On-board Control Complex,” Space Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1995, pp. 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yu. V. Trifonov, A. V. Gorbunov, “Prospects for the ELECTRO Space System Development,” Space Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1995, pp. 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  31. ‘Space Applications,’ DOS Annual Report 1990–91. pp. 13–23

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Joseph, et al., “Very high resolution radiometers for INSAT-2,” Current Science, Vol. 66, No. 1, Jan. 10, 1994, pp. 42–56

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Joseph, et al., “INSAT-2 Very High Resolution Radiometer for Meteorological Observations,” Journal of Spacecraft technology, Vol. IV, No. 1, Jan. 1994, pp. 183–207

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. Ferster, “Policy Shift Paves Way for India-U.S. Imagery Deal,” Space News, Jan. 5–11, 1998, p. 18

    Google Scholar 

  35. ISRO brochure of INSAT-2E, provided by George Joseph

    Google Scholar 

  36. V. S. Iyengar, C. M. Nagrani, et al., “Meteorological imaging instruments on-board INSAT-2E,” Current Science, Vol. 76, No 11, June 10, 1999, pp. 1436–1443

    Google Scholar 

  37. Special Section: INSAT-2E, Current Science, Vol. 76, No 11, June 10, 1999, pp. 1431–1450

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. S. Desai, “Satellite Meteorology in India: Accomplishments and Challenges,” Space Forum, Vol. 5, No. 1–3, 2000, pp. 203–216

    Google Scholar 

  39. K. S. Jayaraman, “India Approves Nation’s 1st Dedicated Weather Satellite,” Space News, Dec. 11, 2000, pp. 3, 20

    Google Scholar 

  40. http://www.isro.org/insat3b.htm

  41. R. Tessier, “The Meteosat Programme,” ESA Bulletin 58, May 1989, pp. 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  42. ESA Information Note to the Press No. 4, Feb. 11, 1991, “MOP-2 Ready for Launch”

    Google Scholar 

  43. “Current and Planned European Operational Meteorological Satellite Systems,” John Morgan, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Symposium on demote Sensing of The Environment, Bangkok, Thailand, April 18–25, 1990, ERIM, Ann Arbor, MI, Vol. I, pp. 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  44. ‘The Meteosat Operational Programme — From Experiments to Exploitation,’ Earth Observation Quarterly, No. 25, March 1989

    Google Scholar 

  45. Introduction to the METEOSAT Operational System, ESA BR-32 ISSN 250–1589, Sept. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  46. ’EUMETSAT Directory of Meteorological Satellite Application,’ ISBN 92 91110 006 4, 1991, EUMETSAT

    Google Scholar 

  47. “The METEOSAT System, EUM TD 05, March 1996, brochure provided by EUMETSAT

    Google Scholar 

  48. “Meteosat Data Collection System,” March 1990, ESOC

    Google Scholar 

  49. “Meteosat DCP Satellite Retransmission System,” January 1990, ESOC

    Google Scholar 

  50. “Meteosat WEFAX Transmissions,” ESOC paper, March 1990

    Google Scholar 

  51. “Meteosat High Resolution Image Dissemination,” ESOC paper, Oct. 1989

    Google Scholar 

  52. “MOSAIC Meteorological Data Distribution,” EUMETSAT, EUM UG 01

    Google Scholar 

  53. W. Veith, “The MSG Satellite and its Subsystems,” Proceedings of the 2000 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data Users’ Conference, Bologna, Italy, May 29–June 2, 2000, pp. 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  54. S. Rota, “The METEOSAT Second Generation,” Proceedings of the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data User’s Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 6–10, 1999, pp. 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  55. http://www.esa.int/msg/

  56. J. Schmid, “The SEVIRI Instrument,” Proceedings of the 2000 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data Users’ Conference, Bologna, Italy, May 29–June 2, 2000, pp. 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  57. M. Huchler, M. Seibel, I. Köker, “The SCAN Assembly for the SEVIRI Instrument on MSG,” DGLR-JT98–118, 1998, pp. 1027–1036

    Google Scholar 

  58. D. M. A. Aminou., B. Jacquet, F. Pasternak, “Characteristics of the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) Radiometer/Imager: SEVIRI”, Proceeding of SPIE, EUROPTO series, Vol. 3221, pp 19–31, 22 September, 22, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  59. P. Pili, “Calibration of SEVIRI,” Proceedings of the 2000 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data Users’ Conference, Bologna, Italy, May 29–June 2, 2000, pp. 33–39

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. E. Harris, “The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget experiment: Status and Science,” Proceedings of the 2000 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data Users’ Conference, Bologna, Italy, May 29–June 2, 2000, pp. 62–71

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. E. Harries, D. Crommelynck, “The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget experiment on MSG-1 and its potential applications,” Advanced Space research, Vol. 24, 1999, pp. 915–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. http://www.ssd.rl.ac.uk/gerb/

  63. P. Vogel, “The GERB Experiment,” Proceedings of the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data User’s Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 6–10, 1999, pp. 124–130

    Google Scholar 

  64. J. Mueller, et al., “GERB: An Earth Radiation Budget Instrumentation on Second Generation Meteosat,” Advanced Space Research, Vol. 24, No 7, 1999, pp. 921–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. S. Dewitte, et al., “In-Flight Calibration of the GERB-1 Instrument,” Proceedings of the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data User’s Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 6–10, 1999, pp. 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  66. J. Mueller, “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) Instrument Calibration Plans,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 19, No 9, 1997, pp. 1307–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. J. Mueller, et al., “Earth Radiation Budget Data from Geostationary Orbit,” Proceedings IGARSS’99, Vol. 2, Hamburg, Germany, June 28 — July 2, 1999, pp.824–825

    Google Scholar 

  68. R. Francis, V. Gärtner, “The Transition from MTP to MSG operations for the End-User Community,” Proceedings of the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data User’s Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 6–10, 1999, pp. 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  69. K. D. McMullan, “The MSG Mission Communications Payload, including the Search and Rescue Transponder,” Proceedings of the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data User’s Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 6–10, 1999, pp. 106–113

    Google Scholar 

  70. D. Just, Y. Buhler, “Data Compression for METEOSAT Second Generation,” Proceedings of the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data User’s Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 6–10, 1999, pp. 131–138

    Google Scholar 

  71. “Meteorological Observation with the Multi-functional Transport Satellite (MTSAT),” brochure of JMA

    Google Scholar 

  72. MTSAT, brochure of JCAB

    Google Scholar 

  73. A press kit “Launch and Tracking & Control of the Multifunctional Transport Satellite (MTSAT) was provided by T. Moriyama of NASDA

    Google Scholar 

  74. Note: As of Jan. 1, 2001, the Japanese Ministry of Transport changed its name to: Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Information provided by Ken Faller of Space Systems/Loral

    Google Scholar 

  76. Information provided by Dominick M. DellaValle of SBRS, Goleta, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kramer, H.J. (2002). Meteorology — GEO (Geosynchronous Earth Orbit) Missions. In: Observation of the Earth and Its Environment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56294-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56294-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62688-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56294-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics