Skip to main content

Assessing the Number of Clusters of the Latent Class Model

  • Conference paper
Classification, Clustering, and Data Analysis

Abstract

When partitioning the data is the main concern, it is implicitly assumed that each cluster can be approximately regarded as a sample from one component of a mixture model. Thus, the clustering problem can be viewed as an estimation problem of the parameters of the mixture. Setting this problem under the Maximum likelihood and Classification likelihood approaches, we first study the clustering of objects described by categorical attributes using the latent class model and we concentrate our attention on the problem of the number of components. To this end, we use three criteria derived within a Bayesian framework to tackle this problem. These criteria based on approximations of integrated likelihood and of integrated classification likelihood have been recently compared in Gaussian mixture. In this work, we propose to extend these comparisons to the latent class model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BANFIELD, J.D. and RAFTERY, A.E. (1993): Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian Clustering. Biometrics, 49, 803–821.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • BIERNACKI, C. CELEUX, G. and GOVAERT, G. (2000): Assessing a Mixture Model for Clustering with the Integrated Completed Likelihood. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22, 7, 719–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • CELEUX, G. and GOVAERT, G. (1992): A Classification EM Algorithm for Clustering and two Stochastic Versions. Computational Statistics ê? Data Analysis, 14, 315–332.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • CELEUX, G. and GOVAERT, G. (1995): Gaussian Parsimonious Clustering Models. Pattern Recognition, 28, 781–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHEESEMAN, P. and STUTZ, J. (1996): Bayesian Classification (AutoClass): Theory and Results. In Fayyad, U. and Pitesky-Shapiro, G. and Uthurusamy, R. (Eds.): Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI Press, 6183.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHICKERING, D.M and HECKERMAN, D. (1997): Maximum Approximations for the Marginal Likelihood of Bayesian Networks with Hidden Variables. Machine Learning, 29, 181–212.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • DAY, N.E. (1969): Estimating the Components of a Mixture of Normal Distributions. Biometrika, 56, 464–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMPSTER, A. P., LAIRD, N. M. and RUBIN, D. B. (1997): Maximum Likelihood for Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, B, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOMINGOS, P. and PAZZANI, M. (1997): Beyond Independence: Conditions for the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier. Machine Learning, 29, 103130.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRALEY, C. and RAFTERY, A.E. (1999): MCLUST: Software for Model-Based Cluster and Discriminant Analysis. Technical Report, 342, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • KASS, R. E. and RAFTERY, A. E. (1995): Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • LAZARFELD, P. F. and HENRY, N. W. (1968): Latent Structure Analysis. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCLACHLAN, G. J. and BASFORD, K. E. (1988): Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MCLACHLAN, G. and PEEL, D. (1998): User’s Guide to EMMIX-Version 1.0. Technical Report, University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, G. (1978): Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • SYMONS, M. J. (1981): Clustering Criteria and Multivariate Normal Mixture. Biometrics, 27, 387–397.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jollois, FX., Nadif, M., Govaert, G. (2002). Assessing the Number of Clusters of the Latent Class Model. In: Jajuga, K., Sokołowski, A., Bock, HH. (eds) Classification, Clustering, and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56181-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56181-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43691-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56181-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics