Advertisement

Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zum Entleerungsverhalten ileoanaler Pouches

  • S. Willis
  • F. Hölz
  • B. Wein
  • V. Schumpelick
Conference paper
Part of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie book series (DTGESCHIR, volume 31)

Abstract

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the method of choice in the surgical therapy of ulcerative colitis or adenomatous polyposis. While the reservoir function of the pouch is undoubted, the role of its motility during defecation is still speculative.

IPAA was performed in 12 dogs and pouch motility was recorded directly by serosal strain gauges and electromyography 12–15 weeks postoperatively. Defecation mechanisms were evaluated by motility recordings during inflation and defecation of a endoluminal balloon and by additional defecography with sequential sector-related grey scale analysis.

Stool frequency increased from 2 ±1 to 14±3 stools/d. Pouch compliance was significantly lower than rectal compliance (2,8 ± 0,5 vs. 4,5 ± 0,7 ml/mmHg). Spontaneous defecations appeared in 30 cases without significant changes of electrical or mechanical activity of the pouch. Sequential filling of the pouch led to defecation in only 4 dogs, while the others did not succeed in emptying their pouch even with maximal balloon inflation. Neither strain gauge measurements nor electromyography demonstrated significant contractions of the pouch during defecation, while sector-related grey scale analysis revealed strong contractions of the abdominal wall during pouch emptying.

Therefore, we conclude that pouch emptying is independent from intrinsic pouch motility. The ileoanal pouch acts as a functionally passive reservoir and its evacuation is initiated by a Valsalva-like manoeuvre with rise of the intra-abdominal pressure due to contractions of the abdominal wall.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Schumpelick V, Willis S, Schippers E (1998) Colitis ulcerosa - Spätresultate nach ileumpouchanaler Anastomose. Chirurg 69: 1013–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelly KA. (1998) Physiologische Auswirkungen der Pouchchirurgie. In: Schippers E, Schumpelick V (Hrsg) Pouch. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, S. 114– 124Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teixeira FV, Kelly KA (1999) Physiologie intestinaler Pouches. Chirurg 70: 513–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levitt MD, Kuan M (1998) The physiology of ileo-anal pouch function. Am J Surg 176: 384–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Connell PR, Kelly KA, Brown ML (1986) Scintigraphic assessment of neorectal motor function. J Nucl Med 27: 460–464Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Willis
    • 1
    • 3
  • F. Hölz
    • 1
  • B. Wein
    • 2
  • V. Schumpelick
    • 1
  1. 1.Chirurgische UniversitätsklinikGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Radiologische DiagnostikRWTH AachenGermany
  3. 3.Chirurgische UniversitätsklinikRWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations