Abstract
Within the framework of Dynamic Decision Making the two preceding Chapters 5 and 6 are designed as to distinctly characterize scalar objectives (Type A objectives) on the one side, and trajectorial objectives (Type B objectives) on the other, as well as to clearly mark the differences between them. A Type A objective is scalar per definitionem, and therefore does naturally not bring up the notion of multiple decision makers. Neither does a Type B objective, even though it very much suggests employing the MCDM methodology: This is because the object of consideration is one decision maker who has to deal with one objective along the time line, i.e. the decision maker has multiple objectives stemming from the intertemporal decision making problem — the idea of multiple decision makers each having one scalar objective at exactly one distinct point of time within the planning horizon can merely serve as a thought experiment to approach a solution to the problem of intertemporal decision making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glaser, B. (2002). Multiple Objectives in Dynamic Decision Making. In: Efficiency versus Sustainability in Dynamic Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 520. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56100-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56100-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43906-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56100-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive