Skip to main content

ACE for Germany? Fighting for a better tax system

  • Chapter

Abstract

Since the mid 80ies, Manfred Rose has been fighting for a fundamental tax reform in Germany. In 1989, he organized the “Heidelberg Congress on Taxing Consumption” (Rose, 1990). Since then, he has been a passionate and untiring advocate of a consumption based tax system. What makes him so special in the public finance community is that he not only contributed to taxation theory. Instead, he went a step further and practically implemented his ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abel, A. B., Mankiw, N. G., Swnmers, L. H., Zeckhauser, R. J. (1989): Assessing dynamic efficiency: theory and evidence. Review of Economic Studies 56, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altig, D., Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, L. J., Smetters K. A., Walliser, J. (1997): Simulating U.S. tax reform. NBER Working Paper No. 6248, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, L. J. (1987): Dynamic fiscal policy. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Bruce, N. (1979): Depreciation and interest deductions and the effect of the corporation income tax on investment. Journal of Public Economics 11, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Bruce, N. (1984): A general proposition on the design of a neutral business tax. Journal of Public Economics 24, 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S. R., Devereux, M. P., Gamrnie, M. J. (1996): Tax reform to promote investment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D. and the U.S. Treasury Tax Policy Staff (1977): Blueprints for basic tax reform. Tax Analysts, Arlington, Virginia (second, revised edition 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernick, H., Reschovsky, A. (1996): Measuring consumption tax burdens: revisiting the annual income — lifetime income debate. In: National Tax Association (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighty-eight annual conference. Colurnbus, Ohio, 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (1997): Monthly report, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. P., Freeman, H. (1991): A general neutral profits tax. Fiscal Studies 12, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, H. (1996): Welfare effects of investment incentive policies: A quantitative assessment. Finanzarchiv 53, 515–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, H. (1999): Privatization of public pensions in Germany: Who gains and how much? Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 218, 674–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, H., Kotlikoff, L. J. (1996): Generational accounting in general equilibrium. Finanzarchiv 53, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, H., Wiegard, W. (1998): German income tax reforms: Separating efficiency from redistribution. In: Fossati, A., Hutton, J. (Eds.), Policy simulation in the European Union. London, 235–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., Rogers, D. L. (1993): Who bears the lifetime tax burden? Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F. (1982): Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, S. (1992): Efficient economic growth. Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFS Capital Taxes Group (1991): Equity for companies: A corporation tax for the 1990s. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFS Capital Taxes Group (1994): Setting savings free. Proposals for the taxation of savings and profits. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, J. (1997): A comment on the viability of the allowance for corporate equity. Fiscal Studies 18, 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanniainen, V., Sødersten, J. (1995): The importance of reporting conventions for the theory of corporate taxation. Journal of Public Economics 57, 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., King, J. (2003): The Croatian Profit Tax: An ACE in Practice. In: Rose, M. (Ed.), Integriertes Steuer-und Transfersystem. Heidelberg, 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuschnigg, C. (1991): The transition to a cash flow income tax. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 127, 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L. J., Smetters, K., Walliser, J. (1998): Social security: Privatization and progressivity. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Ch. E., Zodrow, G. R. (1998): The economic case for foreign tax credits for cash flow taxes. National Tax Journal 51 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade Committee (1978): The structure and reform of direct taxation. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, K., Wagner, G. G., Frick, J., Hauser, R. (1994): How unemployment and income inequality changed in East and West Germany following reunification. In: Burkhauser, R. V., Wagner, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1993 international conference of German socio-economic panel study users. Berlin, 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A, Case, K. E., Leonard, H. (1974): The distribution of fiscal burdens and benefits. Public Finance Quarterly 2, 259–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman, J. A, Okner, B. A (1974): Who bears the tax burden? Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. (Ed.) (1990): Heidelberg Congress on Taxing Consumption. Heidelberg 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M., Wiswesser, R. (1998): Tax reform in transition economies: experiences from participating in the Croatian tax reform process in the 1990s’. In: Sørensen, P. B. (Ed.), Public fmance in a changing world. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P., Wissel, H., Stoeckler, M. (1996): The new Croatian tax system. Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 50, 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (1987): Capital income taxation. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (1991): Taxation and the cost of capital: The “old” view, the “new” view and another view. In: Bradford, D. (Ed.), Tax Policy and the Economy 5. Cambridge, 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. H. (1981): Taxation and corporate investment: A q-theory approach. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1, 67–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1983): Gleichmäßigkeit der Besteuerung von Arbeits-und Vermögenseinkünften. Finanzarchiv 41, 207–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fehr, H., Wiegard, W. (2003). ACE for Germany? Fighting for a better tax system. In: Ahlheim, M., Wenzel, HD., Wiegard, W. (eds) Steuerpolitik — Von der Theorie zur Praxis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55887-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55887-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62483-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55887-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics