Abstract
When solving a dynamic decision problem under uncertainty it is essential to choose or to build a suitable model taking into account the nature of the real-life problem, the character and availability of the input data, etc. There exist hints when to use stochastic dynamic programming models or multiperiod and multistage stochastic programs. Still, it is difficult to provide a general recipe. We refer to recent papers [1, 15] which characterize the main features and basic requirements of these models and indicate the cases which allow for multimodeling and comparisons or for exploitation of different approaches within one decision problem.
For both approaches, solution procedures are mostly based on an approximation scheme and it is important to relate the optimal value and optimal solutions of an approximating problem and the underlying one. It is interesting to recognize that methods of output analysis for stochastic dynamic programs were developed already in the eighties, cf. [25] and references ibidem. Regarding the solution method — the backward recursion connected with the principle of optimality — special emphasis was put on properties of discretization of state and control spaces.
We shall focus on multistage stochastic linear programs with recourse and with already given horizon and stages, that result by approximation of the underlying probability distribution. It turns out that generalization of various results well-known for two-stage stochastic linear programs to the multistage problems is not straightforward and it requires various additional assumptions, e.g., the interstage independence. We shall discuss possible generalizations of output analysis methods as delineated in [10].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bertocchi, M., Dupačov#x00E1;, J., Moriggia, V. (2001): Horizon and stages in applications of stochastic programming in finance, submitted to Ann. Oper. Res.
Birge, J. R., Lou veaux, F. (1997): Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer, New York
Chen, Z., Consigli, G., Dempster, M. A. H., Hicks-Pedrón, N. (1997): Towards sequential sampling algorithms for dynamic portfolio management. In: Zopounidis, C. (ed) New operational tools for the management of financial risks. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 197–211
Dempster, M. A. H. (1998): Sequential importance sampling algorithms for dynamic stochastic programming. WP 32/98, Judge Inst. of Management Studies, University of Cambridge
Dupačov#x00E1;, J. (1987): The minimax approach to stochastic programming and an illustrative application. Stochastics, 20, 73–88
Dupačov#x00E1;, J. (1995): Multistage stochastic programs: The state-of-the-art and selected bibliography. Kybernetika, 31, 151–174
Dupačov#x00E1;, J. (1995): Bounds for stochastic programs in particular for recourse problems. WP-95-085, IIASA Laxenburg
Dupačov#x00E1;, J. (1995): Postoptimality for multistage stochastic linear programs. Ann. Oper. Res., 56, 65–78
Dupačov#x00E1;, J. (1996): Uncertainty about input data in portfolio management. In: Bertocchi, M. et al. (eds) Modelling techniques for financial markets and bank management. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 17–33
Dupačov#x00E1;, J. (2001): Output analysis for approximated stochastic programs. In: Uryasev, S., Pardalos, P. M. (eds) Stochastic optimization: Algorithms and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 1–29
Dupačov#x00E1;, J. (2002): Applications of stochastic programming: Achievements and questions. European J. Oper. Res., 140, 281–290
Dupačov#x00E1;, J., Consigli, G., Wallace, S.W. (2000): Scenarios for multistage stochastic programs. Ann. Oper. Res., 100, 25–53
Dupačov#x00E1;, J., Gröwe-Kuska, N., Römisch, W. (2003): Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: An approach using probability metrics. Math. Progr. A, 95, 493–511
Dupačov#x00E1;, J., Hurt, J., Štěpán, J. (2002) Stochastic modeling in economics and finance, Part II. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Dupačov#x00E1;, J., Sladký, K. (2002) Comparison of multistage stochastic programs with recourse and stochastic dynamic programs with discrete time. ZAMM, 82, 753–765
Dupačov#x00E1;, J., Wets, R. J.-B. (1988): Asymptotic behavior of statistical estimators and of optimal solutions of stochastic optimization problems. Ann. Statist., 16, 1517–1549
Edirisinghe, N. C. P., Ziemba, W. T. (1992): Tight bounds for stochastic convex programs. Oper. Res., 40, 660–677
Fiedler, O., Römisch, W. (1995): Stability in multistage stochastic programming. Ann. Oper. Res., 56, 79–93
Prauendorfer, K. (1996): Barycentric scenario trees in convex multistage stochastic programming. Math. Progr., 75, 277–293
Gol’shtein, E. G. (1970): Vypukloje programmirovanije. Elementy teoriji. Nauka, Moscow. [Theory of convex programming, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 36, American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, 1972].
Hønd, K., Wallace, S. W. (2001): Generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems. Manag. Sc., 47, 295–307
Kall, P., Stoyan, D. (1982): Solving stochastic programming problems with recourse including error bounds. Math. Operationsforschung Statist. Ser. Optimization, 13, 431–447.
Kaňková, V. (2000): Multistage stochastic programming; Stability, approximation and Markov dependence. In: Inderfurth, K. et al. (eds) Operations research proceedings 1999, Springer, Berlin, pp. 136–141
King, A. J., Wets, R. J.-B. (1990): Epi-consistency of convex stochastic programs. Stochastics and Stochastics Reports, 34, 83–92
Langen, H-J. (1981): Convergence of dynamic programming models. Mathematics of Oper. Res., 6, 493–512
Mak Wai-Kei, Morton, D. P., Wood, R. K. (1999): Monte Carlo bounding techniques for determining solution quality in stochastic programs. OR Letters, 24, 47–56
Norkin, V. I., Pflug, G. Ch., Ruszcynski, A. (1998): A branch and bound method for stochastic global optimization. Math. Progr., 83, 425–450
Olsen, P. (1976): Discretization of multistage stochastic programming problems. Math. Programming Study, 6, 111–124
Olsen, P. (1976): Multistage stochastic programming with recourse: The equivalent deterministic problem. SIAM J. Control Optim., 14, 495–517
Pflug, G. Ch. (2001): Scenario tree generation for multiperiod financial optimization by optimal discretization. Math. Progr. B, 89, 251–271
Rachev, S. T., Römisch, W. (2002): Quantitative stability of stochastic programs: The approach via probability metrics. Mathematics of Operations Research 27, 792–818
Römisch, W., Wets, R. J.-B. (2001): Stability of ϵ-solutions to multistage stochastic programs. Manuscript, Inst. of Mathematics, Humboldt University, Berlin
Schürle, M. (1998): Zinsmodelle in der stochastischen Optimierung mit Anwendungen im Asset-& Liability-Management. Bank und finanzwirtschaftliche Forschungen 279, P. Haupt Verlag, Bern
Shapiro, A. (1991): Asymptotic analysis of stochastic programs. Ann. Oper. Res., 30, 169–186
Shapiro, A. (2002): Statistical inference of multistage stochastic programming problems. Preprint, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta
Shapiro, A., Homem-de-Mello, T. (2000): On rate of convergence of Monte Carlo approximations of stochastic programs. SIAM J. Optimization, 11, 70–86
Wets, R. (1966): Programming under uncertainty: The solution set. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 14, 1143–1151
Wets, R. (1972): Stochastic programs with recourse: A basic theorem for multistage problems. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb., 21, 201–206
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dupačová, J. (2004). Reflections on Output Analysis for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programs. In: Marti, K., Ermoliev, Y., Pflug, G. (eds) Dynamic Stochastic Optimization. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 532. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55884-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55884-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40506-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55884-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive