Advertisement

Computerassistierte Navigation mit dem OrthoPilot-System und der Search-Evolution-Knieendoprothese

Ergebnisse einer Multicenter-Studie
  • U. Clemens
  • R. K. Miehlke
  • S. Kohler
  • H. Kiefer
  • J. Y. Jenny
  • W. Konermann

Zusammenfassung

Gerade junge Technologien im operativen Bereich lassen oft eine ausreichende Datenlage zu den erzielten Ergebnissen missen. Umso sinnvoller erscheint es, die Zuverlässigkeit und Effektivität des Navigationssystems OrthoPilot im Rahmen einer Multicenter-Studie an fünf knieendoprothetisch erfahrenen Zentren zu überprüfen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MAR (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 173: 178–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonnici AV, Allen PR (1991) Comparison oflong leg and simple knee radiographs in assesment of knees prior to surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 73-B (Supp 1): 65Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coull R, Bankes MJK, Rossouw DJ (1999) Evaluation of tibial component angles in 79 consecutive total knee arthroplastics. Knee 6: 235–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies BL, Picard F, Leitner F (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354: 49–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorr LD, Conaty JP, Schreffier R, Mehne DK, Hull D (1985) Technical factors that influence mechanicalloosening of total knee arthroplasty. In: Dorr LD (ed) The knee. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 121–135Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ischii Y, Ohmori G, Bechthold J, Gustilo RB (1995) Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 318: 167–175Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeffery JA (1999) Accuracy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement: intraoperative assessment of alignment rod position. Knee 6: 211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comp Aided Surg 6: 217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jonsson B, Astrom J (1988) Alignment and long-term clinical results of a semi-constrained knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 226: 124–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1986) Survival of knee arthroplastics, a nation-wide multicenter investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 68B: 795–803Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopaedics 13: 861–868Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krackow KA, Serpe L, Phillips MJ Bayers-Thering M, Mihalko WM (1999) A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: Progress toward computer assisted TKA. Orthopedics 22: 698–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laskin RS (1984) Alignment of total knee components. Orthopaedics 7: 62Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leitner F, Picard F, Minfelde R, Schulz HJ, Clinquin P, Saragaglia D (1997) Computer assisted knee surgical total replacement. In: Troccaz J, Grimson E, Mösges R (Hrsg) CVRMed-MRCAS. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 630–638Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nafei A, Kristensen O, Knudson HM, Hvid I, Jensen J (1996) Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthoplasty. J Arthoplasty 11: 7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patel DV, Ferris BD, Aichroth PM (1991) Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 15: 209–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3: 67–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Picard F, Leitner F, Raoult O, Saragaglia D (2000) Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. In: Jerosch J, Nicol K, Peikenkamp K (Hrsg) Rechnergestützte Verfahren in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, S 461–471Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Picard F, Saragaglia D, Montbarbon E, Chaussard C, Leitner F, Raoult O (1999) Computer assisted knee arthroplasty — preliminary clinical results with the OrthoPilot system. Proceedings, 4th International CAOS Symposium, DavosGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232: 168–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299: 153–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axiallimb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop 371: 246–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Clemens
  • R. K. Miehlke
  • S. Kohler
  • H. Kiefer
  • J. Y. Jenny
  • W. Konermann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations