Skip to main content

The Healthy Breast

  • Chapter

Abstract

It is truly sobering that the female breast — celebrated by poets1, a sex symbol, and a major source of income for plastic surgeons — is, from a phylogenetic standpoint, a modified cutaneous sweat gland. During ontogenesis, the human breast initially undergoes the same phylogenetic phases that occur in mammals with multiple paired mammary glands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur JE, Ellis IO, Flowers C et al. (1990) The relationship of “high risk” mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast. Br J RadioI 63: 845–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barth V, Prechtel K (1990) Atlas der Brustdrüse und ihrer Erkrankungen. Enke, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH et al. (1991) Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 180: 831–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bässler R (1978) Pathologie der Brustdrüse. In: Doerr W, Seifert G, Uehlinger E (Hrsg) “Spezielle pathologische Anatomie”; Bd 11. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bässler R (1997) Die Mastitis. Pathologe 18: 27–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bässler R (1997) Mamma. In: Remmele W (ed) Pathologie; Bd 4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beijerinck D, Noord PAH van, Seidell JC et al. (1991) Abdominal fat predominance in women is associated with a decreased prevalence of the high risk P2, Dy-mammographic breast patterns. Int J Obesity 15: 89–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkowitz JE, Gatewood OM, Goldblum LE et al. (1990) Hormonal replacement therapy: mammographic manifestations. Radiology 174: 199–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. BI-RADS (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data systems. 3rd edn. Am College of Radiology, Resten/VA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al. (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from Canadian national breast screening study. J Nat Cancer Inst 87: 670–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradley FM, Hoover HC, Hulka CA et al. (1996) The sternalis muscle: an unusual normal finding seen on mammography. AJR 166: 33–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Britton CA, Baratz AB, Harris KM (1989) Carcinoma mimicked by the sternal insertion of the pectoral muscle. AJR 153: 955–956

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J et al. (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Nat Cancer Inst 87: 1622–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlile T, Kopecky KJ, Thompson DJ et al. (1985) Breast cancer prediction and the Wolfe classification of mammograms. JAMA 254: 1050–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ciatto S, Bravetti P, Cecchini S et al. (1990) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. Radiol Med Torino 79: 346–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciatto S, Zappa M (1993) Aprospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience. Eur J Radiol 17: 122–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper A (1845) The anatomy and diseases of the breast. Lea & Blanchard, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper RA, Johnson MS (1990) Mammographic depiction of Poland’s syndrome. Br J Radiol 63: 302–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cyrlak D, Wong CH (1993) Mammographic changes in postmenopausal women undergoing hormonal replacement therapy. AJR 161: 1177–1183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Doyle GJ, McLean L (1994) Unilateral increase in mammographic density with hormone replacement therapy. Clin Radiol 49: 50–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Egan R, McSweeney MB (1979) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and the risk of breast cancer. Radiology 133: 65–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Flook D, Gilhome RW, Harman J et al. (1987) Changes in Wolfe mammographic patterns with aging. Br J Radiol 60: 455–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fochem K, Narik G (1957) Die Röntgenaufnahme der weiblichen Brust (Mammogramme) als Schwangerschaftsnachweis. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 17: 957–963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabár L (1995) Reproductive and menstrual factors in relation to mammographic parenchymal patterns among perimenopausal women. Br J Cancer 71: 647–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabár L (1997) The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol 24: 131–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gravelle IH, Bulstrode JC, Bulbrook RD et al. (1986) A prospective study of mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer. Br J Radiol 59: 487–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grove JS, Goodman MJ, Gilbert FI et al. (1985) Wolfe’s mammographic classification and breast cancer risk: the effect of misclassification on apparent risk ratios. Br J Radiol 58: 15–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamperl H (1939) Über die Myothelien (myo-epithelialen Elemente) der Brustdrüse. Virch Arch Pathol Anat 305: 171–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I (1996) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik. In: Mödder U (Hrsg) Referenz-Reihe-Radiologische Diagnostik. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jakes RW, Duffy SW, Ng FC et al. (2000) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer at and after a prevalence screen in Singaporean women. Int J Epidemiol 29: 11–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaufman Z, Garstin WIH, Hayes R et al. (1991) The mammographic parenchym patterns of women an hormonal replacement therapy. Clin Radiol 43: 389–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kavanagh AM, Mitchell H, Giles GG (2000) Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening. Lancet 355: 270–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Keßler M, Fischedick O (1980) Mammaparenchymmuster nach Wolfe und Karzinomrisiko. Röfo 132: 428–432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kitamura K, Kuwano H, Kiyomatsu K et al. (1995) Mastopathy of the accessory breast in the bilateral axillary regions occurring concurrently with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 35: 221–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kopans DB (1998) Breast imaging. 2nd edn. Lippincott — Raven

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kopans DB, Swann CA, White G et al. (1989) Asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 171: 639–643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Law J (1992) Improved image quality for dense breasts in mammography. Br J Radiol 65: 50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leborgne RA (1953) The breast in roentgen diagnosis. Impresora Uruguaya SA, Montevideo

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leinster SJ, Whitehouse GH (1986) The mammographic breast pattern and oral contraception. Br J Radiol 59: 237–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lendvai-Viragh K, Ritzkowsky D (1994) Änderungen des Drüsenkörpers der Mammae nach Hormontherapie. Akt Radiol 4: 264–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McNicholas MMJ, Heneghan JP, Milner MH et al. (1994) Pain and increased mammographic density in women receiving hormone replacement therapy: a prospective study. AJR 163: 311–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mendell L, Rosenbloom M, Naimark A (1977) Are breast patterns a risk index for breast cancer? A reappraisal. AJR 128:547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Moskowitz M (1982) Mammographic parenchymal patterns: More controversy. JAMA 247: 210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ohtake T, Abe R, Kimijima I et al. (1995) Intraductal extension of primary invasive breast carcinoma treated by breast-conservative surgery. Cancer 76: 32–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ohtake T, Kimijima I, Fukushima T et al. (2001) Computer-assisted complete three-dimensional reconstruction of the mammary ductal/lobular systems. Cancer 91: 2263–2272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Peeters PHM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL et al. (1989) The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme. Br J Cancer 59: 929–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Radner H, Berger A, Schmid KO (1987) Mamma supernumeraria dorsalis interscapularis (paravertebralis). Ein klinisch-pathologischer Fallbericht mit Literaturübersicht. Pathologe 8: 310–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Reck T, Dworak O, Thaler KH et al. (1995) Hamartom einer Mamma aberrata in der Leiste. Chirurg 66: 923–926

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Saftlas AF, Hoover RN, Brinton LA et al. (1991) Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 67: 2833–2838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Saftlas AF, Wolfe JN, Hoover RN et al. (1989) Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemol 129: 518–526

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Samuels TH, Haider MA, Kirkbride P (1996) Poland’s syndrome: A mammographic presentation. AJR 166: 347–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Schwarz E, Eiter H, Taxer F (1983) Das Karzinom der so genannten leeren Brust und seine Beziehungen zur Klassifikation der Parenchymmuster nach Wolfe. Röfo 139: 81–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Skaane P, Skjennald A, Solberg LA (1987) Unilateral breast hyperplasia in pregnancy simulating neoplasm. Br J Radiol 60: 407–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Soutoul JH, Pierre F (1989) Le prix du sein perdu augmente! Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 84: 609–612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Stacey-Clear A, McCarthy KA, Hall DA et al. (1993) Mammographically detected breast cancer: location in women under 50 years old. Radiology 186: 677–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Stomper PC, Voorhis BJ van, Ravnikar VA et al. (1990) Mammographic changes associated with postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: a longitudinal study. Radiology 174: 487–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Swann CA, Kopans DB, McCarthy KA et al. (1987) Mammographic density and physical assessment of the breast. AJR 148: 525–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Tabàr L, Dean PB (1982) Mammographic parenchymal patterns. Risk indicator for breast cancer. JAMA 247: 185–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Thurfjell EL, Holmberg LH, Persson IR (1997) Screening mammography: sensitivity and specificity in relation to hormone replacement therapy. Radiology 203: 339–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Tot T, Tabár L, Dean PB (2000) The pressing need for better histologic-mammographic correlation of many variations in normal breast anatomy. Virch Arch 437: 338–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Van Gils CH, Otten JDM, Verbeek ALM et al. (1998) Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality? Eur J Epidemiol 14: 315–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Warner E, Lockwood G, Math M et al. (1992) The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the public literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prev 16: 67–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Whitehead J, Carlile T, Kopecky KJ et al. (1985) Wolfe mamographic parenchymal patterns. Cancer 56: 1280–1286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ (1985) The variation of breast parenchymal patterns with age. Br J Radiol 58: 315–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Wilhelm H, Abet L (1987) Risikoparenchym im Mammogramm und Nulliparität, Radiol Diagn 28: 675–682

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wolfe JN (1967) A study of breast parenchyma by mammography in the normal woman and those with benign and malignant disease. Radiology 89: 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wolfe JN (1976.a) Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. Radiology 121: 545–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wolfe JN (1976.b) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR 126: 1130–1139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lanyi, M. (2003). The Healthy Breast. In: Mammography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55632-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55632-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62900-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55632-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics