Skip to main content

Ergebnisse nach diversen biologischen Rekonstruktionsverfahren

  • Chapter
Praxisleitfaden der Knorpelreparatur
  • 52 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Grundsätzlich sind die operativen Behandlungsmethoden zu unterscheiden in primäre und sekundäre Behandlungstechniken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Harwin.Arthroscopic Debridement for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Predictors of Patient Satisfaction. Arthroscopy (15): 142–142, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galindo E Merchan E. Arthroscope-Guided Surgery Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Limited Degenerative Arthritis. Arthroscopy 9: 663–667, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hubbard M.Articular Debridement Versus Washout for Degeneration of the Medial Femur Condyle. J Bone Joint Surg 78B(5): 217–219, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pridie A.H.The method of Resurfacing Osteoarthritic Joints. J Bone Joint Surg 41-B:6 18–623, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shepard N Mitchell N. The Resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilageby multiple perforations through the subchondral bone. J Bone Joint Surg 58-A: 230–233, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yasukawa Y Akizuki S. Does Arthroscopic ArthroplastyPromote Cartilage Regeneration in Osteoarthritis Knees with Eburnation?A Prospective Study of Hihg tibial Osteotomy with Abrasion Arthroplasty versus High Tibial Osteotomy Alone. Arthroscopy 13: 9–17, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steadman R Rodrigo J Silliman J Blevins F.Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects in Athletes:An Analysis of Functional Outcome and Lesion Appearance. Orthopedics 21 (7): 761–768, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia M Cuso X Cugat R. A Historical Review and tretment with Cannulated Srews. Arthroscopy 9(6): 675–684, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pagnani M Anderson A. Osteochondrits Dissecans of the Femoral Condyles. Long term results of excision of the fragment. Am J Sports Med 25 (6): 830–834, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shino K. Nakata K. Fixation of unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions with osteochondral plugs. ICRS Newsletter Got.Is.: 9–11, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ciardullo A Giron F Ponteggia F Aglietti P. Results of Arthroscopic Excision of the Fragment of osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee. Arthroscopy 17(7): 741–746, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sagastibelza J Lopez Blasco J.J. Grande M Zuniga J.J.R. Arthroscopic use of the Herbert Screw in osteochondritis dissecans of the kne. Arthroscopy 9: 668–670, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mascia A Miniaci A Berlet G.C. Treatment of unstable osteochondritis disscan lesions of the knee using autogenous osteochondral grafts (mosaicplasty). Arthroscopy 15: 312–316, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evabs P Pearce S Clarnette R Miniaci A Hurtig M.The effect ofgraft size and number of the outcome of mosaic arthroplasty resurfacing:An experimental model in sheep.Arthroscopy Association North America 18: 16–17, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hurtig M.B. Clarnette R Kalra M Cowan B Pearce S.G. An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts. Arthroscopy 17:50–55, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kish G Karpati Z Hangody L. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular Cartilage defcts:Application in clinical Practice. Orthop 21:751–755, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haugegaard M and Vibe-Hansen H Lundsgaard C. Treatment of cartilage defects with autologous chondrocyte transplantation- preliminary results. Acta Orthop Scand 2(69): 11–11, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caterson B Evans E Asthon B Roberts S Richardson. Repair of human articular cartilage after implantation of autologous chondrocytes. J Bone Joint Surg 81B: 1064–1068, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Minas T Brittberg M Nilsson A Jansan E Lindahl A Peterson L. Two to Nine Year Outcomes After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee. Clin Orthop Rel Res 374: 212–234, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brittberg M.ICRS Clinical Cartilage Injury Evaluation System 2000.Third ICRS Meeting, 2000.Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krackhardt, T. (2003). Ergebnisse nach diversen biologischen Rekonstruktionsverfahren. In: Fritz, J., Aicher, W.K., Eichhorn, HJ. (eds) Praxisleitfaden der Knorpelreparatur. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55521-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55521-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-01029-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55521-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics