Skip to main content

Multifidelity Global Optimization Using DIRECT

  • Conference paper
  • 1099 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering ((LNCSE,volume 30))

Abstract

Multifidelity global optimization methods have the potential to allow the optimization of problems which are computationally expensive and have high dimensionality. The DIRECT algorithm has been modified to incorporate multifidelity information. Two correction strategies have been employed with problems with up to ten dimensions and thousands of local optima. DIRECT has demonstrated the ability to reach the same global optimum using high fidelity analyses or corrected low fidelity function values. Initial work with two correction strategies have shown a minor reduction in the number of high-fidelity analyses required but refinements to the stopping criteria have the potential for greatly reducing the cost of the optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haftka, R. T. “Combining global and local approximations.” AIAA Journal, Vol. 29, No.9, 1991, pp. 1523–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mcquade, P.D., Eberhardt, S. and Livne, E., “CFD-Based Aerodynamic Approximation Concepts Optimization of a Two-Dimensional Scramjet Vehicle”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 32, NO.2, March–April 1995, pp. 262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexandrov, N. M., Dennis, J. E., Lewis, R M., and Torczon, V., “A Trustregion Framework for Managing the use of Approximation Models in Optimization”, Structural Optimization, Vol 15, 1998, pp. 16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Floudas C.A. and Pardalos P.M. (1996), State of the Art in Global Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramrez-Rosado, I. J. and Bernal-Augustn, “Genetic Algorithms Applied to the Design of Large Power Distribution Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 13, NO.2, May 1998, pp. 696–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamberti, L., Venkataraman, S., Haftka, R T. and Johnson, T. F., “Preliminary Design Optimization of Stiffened Panels Using Approximate Analysis Models”, Submitted For Review to the International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swift, R A. and Batill, S. M., “Simulated Annealing Utilizing Neural Networks for Discrete Variable Optimization Problems in Structural Design”,33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Dallas, TX, April 1992, pp. 2536–2544

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, D.R., Perttunen, C.D., Stuckman, RE. (1993), “Lipschitzian Optimization Without the Lipschitz Constant”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, Vol.79, pp. 157–181.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, C. A., Grossman, B., Haftka, R T., Mason, W. H. and Watson, L. T., “HSCT Configuration Design Space Exploration using Aerodynamic Response Surface Approximations”, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St Louis, Missouri, Sept. 2–4, 1998, pp. 769–777, AIAA Paper-98-4803

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ishikawa, T., Tsukui, Y. and Matsunami, M., “A Combined Method for the Global Optimization Using Radial Basis Function and Deterministic Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 35, NO.3, May 1999, pp. 1730–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M. and Welch, W. J., “Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions”,Journal of Global Optimization, Vol.13, 1998, pp.455–492

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Knill, D. L., Giunta, A. A., Baker, C. A., Grossman, B., Mason, W. H., Haftka, R T. and Watson, L. T. “Response surface model combining linear and euler aerodynamics for super sonic transport design.” Journal of Aircraft; Vol. 36, No.1, 1999, pp. 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cox, S., Haftka, R.T., Baker, C., Grossman, B., Mason, W. and Watson, L. T., “Global Multidisciplinary Optimization of a High Speed Civil Transport”.Proc. Aerospace Numerical Simulation Symposium’ 99, Tokyo, Japan, June, 1999, pp. 23–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cox, S.E., Haftka, R.T. (2003). Multifidelity Global Optimization Using DIRECT. In: Biegler, L.T., Heinkenschloss, M., Ghattas, O., van Bloemen Waanders, B. (eds) Large-Scale PDE-Constrained Optimization. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 30. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55508-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55508-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-05045-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55508-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics