Skip to main content

Warum lohnt sich der Blick ins Gehirn?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wie kommt die Moral in den Kopf?
  • 7118 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Jahrtausendelang wurde darüber spekuliert, was das menschliche Verhalten verursacht. Unterschiedliche Richtungen der Psychologie haben dazu viele Mutmaßungen entwickelt. Neues Licht in dieses Dunkel bringt die Gehirnforschung. Sie untersucht über die Spekulationen hinaus, wo im Gehirn Bereiche aktiv werden und welche Prozesse ablaufen, wenn eine Person zu einem bestimmten Verhalten motiviert wird.

Dabei zeigt sich, dass unser Gehirn die Welt um uns dauernd bewertet, bewusst und noch viel häufiger blitzschnell, automatisch und unbewusst. Viele solche Bewertungsprozesse, auch Ergebnisse des Kampfes zwischen konkurrierenden Zielen und Motiven, bringen uns dann dazu, etwas zu tun oder zu lassen.

Sorgfältig-bewusste Entscheidungen, auch moralischer oder politischer Art, sind selten. Dabei sind zahlreiche Gehirnbereiche tätig, es gibt keine oberste Zentralinstanz für wertgebundene, moralische und politische Entscheidungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollongino, R., et al. (2013). 2000 years of parallel societies in stone age central Europe. Science, 342(6157), 479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspers, S., Heim, S., Lucas, M. G., Stephan, E., Fischer, L., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2011). Moral concepts set decision strategies to abstract values. Public Library of Science ONE, 6(4), e18451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen, Y., Changeux, J.-P., Damasio, A., & Singer, W. (2005). Introduction: Neurobiology of human values. In J.-P. Changeux, A. R. Damasio, W. Singer, & Y. Christen (Hrsg.), Neurobiology of human values (S. IX–XV). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S., & Winkielman, P. (2012). Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: How does it work? What does it mean? Hormones and behavior, 61(3), 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, G. S., Sugrue, L. P., Brown, J. R., & Newsome, W. T. (2009). The trouble with choice: Studying decision variables in the brain. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Hrsg.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (S. 461–478). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Our multi‐system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In J. M. Doris, F. Cushman, & The Moral Psychology Research Group (Hrsg.), The moral psychology handbook (S. 47–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2005). The neurobiological grounding of human values. In J.-P. Changeux, A. R. Damasio, W. Singer, & Y. Christen (Hrsg.), Neurobiology of human values (S. 47–56). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2009). Neuroscience and the emergence of neuroeconomics. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Hrsg.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (S. 209–214). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M., & Damasio, A. R. (1994). The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science, 264, 1102–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317, 1344–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, C. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2009). The functional brain architecture of human morality. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 678–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher, P. W., Camerer, C. E. F., Fehr, E., & Poldrack, R. A. (Hrsg.). (2009). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendyk, E. (2011). Current emotion research in political science: How emotions help democracy overcome its collective action problem. Emotion Review, 3(4), 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2009). Self‐control in decision‐making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 324(5927), 646–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, M., von Dawans, B., & Domes, G. (2009). Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30, 548–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21(8), 677–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, T. (2008). A neuroeconomic model. Paper presented at IAREP/SAPE 2008 in Rome. http://static.luiss.it/iarep2008/programme/papers/136.pdf. Zugegriffen: 6.12.2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., de Oliviera-Souza, R., & Zahn, R. (2008). The neural basis of moral cognition: Sentiments, concepts, and values. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1124, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, C. C., Ugazio, G., & Fehr, E. (2013). Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation. Science, 342(6157), 482–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, B., & McClure, S. M. (2008). Anchors, scales and the relative coding of value in the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, M., Rothmayr, C., Döhnel, K., Meinhardt, J., Schwerdtner, J., Sodian, B., & Hajak, G. (2010). How should I decide? The neural correlates of everyday moral reasoning. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 2018–2026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, M. (2009). Selbstkontrolle. Die Rolle der Werte bei Entscheidungen. Nervenheilkunde, 28, 487–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassy, S., et al. (2012). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(3), 282–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Universität Zürich (2013). Hirnstimulation beeinflusst Einhaltung von Normen. Medienmitteilung vom 03.10.2013. www.mediadesk.uzh.ch/articles/2013/hirnstimulation-beeinflusst-einhaltung-von-normen.html. Zugegriffen: 6.12.2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, N. T., Montag, C., Markett, S., Felten, A., Voigt, G., & Reuter, M. (2012). Ignorance is no excuse: Moral judgments are influenced by a genetic variation on the oxytocin receptor gene. Brain and Cognition, 78(3), 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiswede, D., Taubner, S., Münte, T., Roth, G., Strüber, D., Wahl, K., & Krämer, U. M. (2011). Neurophysiological correlates of laboratory‐induced aggression in young men with and without a history of violence. Public Library of Science ONE, 6(7), 1–10. e22599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, K., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). Mapping value based planning and extensively trained choice in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 786–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, K., Rangel, A., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2009). Neural computations underlying action‐based decision making in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(40), 17199–17204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, R., Moll, J., Paiva, M., Garrido, G., Krueger, F., Huey, E. D., & Grafman, J. (2009). The neural basis of human social values: Evidence from functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex, 19(2), 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J. (2009). The moral molecule. Vortrag bei Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1405393. Zugegriffen: 6.12.2013

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Wahl .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wahl, K. (2015). Warum lohnt sich der Blick ins Gehirn?. In: Wie kommt die Moral in den Kopf?. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55407-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55407-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55406-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55407-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics