Abstract
In a group-sequential trial, patients are recruited in groups, and their response to treatment is assessed. After each group is assessed, an interim analysis is conducted. At each interim analysis, the trial can stop for futility, stop for efficacy, or continue. The main advantage of group-sequential designs is that the expected number of patients is reduced compared to a design without interim analyses. There are infinitely many possible group-sequential designs to use, and the choice strongly affects the operating characteristics of the trial. This chapter discusses optimal and admissible group-sequential designs. Optimal designs minimise the expected sample size at some specified treatment effect; admissible designs optimise a weighted sum of trial properties of interest, such as expected sample size and maximum sample size. Methods for finding such designs are discussed, including a detailed description of an R package that implements a quick search procedure. Recent applications of group-sequential methodology to trials with multiple experimental treatments being tested against a single control treatment are also described.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, K.: gsDesign: Group Sequential Design (2012). URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gsDesign. R package version 2.6-04
Armitage, P., McPherson, C.K., Rowe, B.C.: Repeated significance tests on accumulating data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 132, 235–244 (1969)
Barber, S., Jennison, C.: Optimal asymmetric one-sided group sequential tests. Biometrika 89, 49–60 (2002)
Berry, S.M., Carlin, B.P., Lee, J.J., Muller, P.: Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. CRC Press (2010)
Cook, R.J., Farewell, V.T.: Guidelines for monitoring efficacy and toxicity responses in clinical trials. Biometrics 50, 1146–1152 (1994)
Dunnett, C.W.: A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50, 1096–1121 (1955)
Eales, J.D., Jennison, C.: An improved method for deriving optimal one-sided group sequential tests. Biometrika 79, 13–24 (1992)
Eales, J.D., Jennison, C.: Optimal two-sided group sequential tests. Sequential Analysis 14, 273–286 (1995)
Emerson, S.S., Flemming, T.R.: Symmetric group sequential designs. Biometrics 45, 905–923 (1989)
Genz, A., Bretz, F.: Methods for the computation of multivariate t-probabilities. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 11, 950–971 (2002)
Hampson, L.V., Jennison, C.: Group sequential tests for delayed responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 75, 1–37 (2013)
Jennison, C., Turnbull, B.W.: Exact calculations for sequential t,χ 2 and f tests. Biometrika 78, 133–141 (1991)
Jennison, C., Turnbull, B.W.: Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials. Chapman and Hall (2000)
Jung, S.H., Lee, T., Kim, K., George, S.L.: Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 23, 561–569 (2004)
Kittelson, J.M., Emerson, S.: A unifying family of group sequential test designs. Biometrics 55, 874–882 (1999)
Magirr, D., Jaki, T., Whitehead, J.: A generalized Dunnett test for multiarm-multistage clincial studies with treatment selection. Accepted by Biometrika 99, 494–501 (2012)
Mander, A.P., Wason, J.M.S., Sweeting, M.J., Thompson, S.G.: Admissible two-stage designs for phase ii cancer clinical trials that incorporate the expected sample size under the alternative hypothesis. Pharmaceutical Statistics (in press) 11, 91–96 (2012)
McPherson, K., Armitage, P.: Repeated significance tests on accumulating data when the null hypothesis is not true. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 134, 15–25 (1971)
Nelder, J.A., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal 7, 308–313 (1965)
O’Brien, P.C., Flemming, T.R.: A multiple-testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 35, 549–556 (1979)
Pampallona, S., Tsiatis, A.A.: Group sequential designs for one-sided and two-sided hypothesis testing with provision for early stopping in favor of the null hypothesis. J. Statist. Planning and Inference 42, 19–35 (1994)
Pocock, S.J.: Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Biometrika 64, 191–199 (1977)
Royston, P., Parmar, M.K.B., Qian, W.: Novel designs for multi-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer. Statistics in Medicine 22, 2239–2256 (2003)
Shao, J., Feng, H.: Group sequential t-tests for clinical trials with small sample sizes across stages. Contemporary Clinical Trials 28, 563–571 (2007)
Shuster, J.: Optimal two-stage designs for single-arm phase II cancer trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 22, 39–51 (2002)
Simon, R.: Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 10, 1–10 (1989)
Sydes, M.R., Parmar, M.K.B., James, N., et al.: Issues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial. Trials 10 (2009)
Wason, J.M.S.: OptGS: An R package for finding near-optimal group-sequential designs. Journal of Statistical Software Accepted (2013)
Wason, J.M.S., Jaki, T.: Optimal design of multi-arm multi-stage trials. Statistics in Medicine 31, 4269–4279 (2012)
Wason, J.M.S., Mander, A.P.: Minimising the maximum expected sample size in two-stage phase II clinical trials with continuous outcomes. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, in press 22, 836–852 (2012)
Wason, J.M.S., Mander, A.P., Thompson, S.: Optimal multi-stage designs for randomised clinical trials with continuous outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 31, 301–312 (2012)
Wassmer, G., Vandemeulebroecke, M.: A brief review on software developments for group sequential and adaptive designs. Biometrical Journal 48, 732–737 (2006)
Whitehead, J., Stratton, I.: Group sequential clinical trials with triangular continuation regions. Biometrics 39, 227–236 (1983)
Whitehead, J., Valdes-Marquez, E., Lissmats, A.: A simple two-stage design for quantitative responses with application to a study in diabetic neuropathic pain. Pharmaceutical statistics 8, 125–135 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wason, J.M.S. (2014). Recent Developments in Group-Sequential Designs. In: van Montfort, K., Oud, J., Ghidey, W. (eds) Developments in Statistical Evaluation of Clinical Trials. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55345-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55345-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55344-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55345-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)