Abstract
In this chapter, an overview is given of different methods to analyse data from a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with more than one follow-up measurement. For a continuous outcome variable, a classical GLM for repeated measurements can be used to analyse the difference in development over time between the intervention and control group. However, because GLM for repeated measurements has some major disadvantages (e.g., only suitable for complete cases), it is advised to use more advanced statistical techniques such as mixed model analysis or Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). The biggest problem with the analysis of data from an RCT with more than one follow-up measurement is the possible need for an adjustment for baseline differences. To take these differences into account a longitudinal analysis of covariance, an autoregressive analysis or a ‘combination’ approach can be used. The choice for a particular method depends on the characteristics of the data. For dichotomous outcome variables, an adjustment for baseline differences between the groups is mostly not necessary. Regarding the more advanced statistical techniques it was shown that the effect measures (i.e. odds ratios) differ between a logistic mixed model analysis and a logistic GEE analysis. This difference between these two methods was not observed in the analysis of a continuous outcome variable. Based on several arguments (e.g., mathematical complexity, unstable results, etc.), it was suggested that a logistic GEE analysis has to be preferred above a logistic mixed model analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Berkhof, J., Knol, D., Rijmen, F., Twisk, J., Uitdehaag, B., Boers, M.: Relapse - remission and remission - relapse switches in rheumatiod arthritis patients were modelled by random effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62, 1085–1094 (2009)
Box-Steffensmeier, J., De Boef, S.: Repeated events survival models: the conditional frailty model. Statistics in Medicine 25, 3518–3533 (2006)
Fitzmaurice, G.M., Laird, N.M., Ware, J.H.: Applied longitudinal data analysis. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA (2004)
Goldstein, H.: Multilevel statistical models, 3rd edn. Edward Arnold, London (2003)
Kelly, P.J., Lim, L.Y.: Survival analysis for recurrent event data: An application to childhood infectious diseases. Statistics in Medicine 19, 13–33 (2003)
Laird, N.M., Ware, J.H.: Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38, 963–974 (1982)
Lesaffre, E., Spiessens, B.: On the effect of the number of quadrature points in a logistic random-effects model: an example. Annals of Applied Statistics 50, 325–335 (2001)
Liang, K., Zeger, S.L.: Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73, 45–51 (1986)
Liang, K.Y., Zeger, S.L.: Regression analysis for correlated data. Annual Review of Public Health 14, 43–68 (1993)
Rothman, K.J., Greenland, S.: Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philidelphia (1998)
Stürmer, T., Glynn, R.J., Kliebsch, U., Brenner, H.: Analytic strategies for recurrent events in epidemiologic studies: background and application to hospitalization risk in the elderly. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53, 57–64 (2000)
Twisk, J.W.R.: Longitudinal data analysis. A comparison between generalized estimating equations and random coefficient analysis. European Journal of Epidemiology 19, 769–776 (2004)
Twisk, J.W.R.: Applied multilevel analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2006)
Twisk, J.W.R.: Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: a practical guide, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2013)
Twisk, J.W.R., Proper, K.: Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57, 223–228 (2004)
Twisk, J.W.R., Smidt, N., de Vente, W.: Applied analysis of recurrent events: a practical overview. The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59, 706–710 (2005)
Twisk, J.W.R., de Vente, W.: The analysis of randomised controlled data with more than one follow-up measurement. A comparison between different approaches. European Journal of Epidemiology 23, 655–660 (2008)
Yang, M., Goldstein, H.: Multilevel models for repeated binary outcomes: attitudes and voting over the electoral cycle. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 163, 49–62 (2000)
Zeger, S.L., Liang, K.Y.: Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42, 121–130 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Twisk, J.W.R. (2014). Different Methods to Analyse the Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial with More Than One Follow-Up Measurement. In: van Montfort, K., Oud, J., Ghidey, W. (eds) Developments in Statistical Evaluation of Clinical Trials. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55345-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55345-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55344-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55345-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)