Conclusion: Why a New Theory of Contestation?

Abstract

This chapter summarises the book’s objective to develop the theory of contestation by highlighting the interrelation between contestation as a norm-generative practice and contestedness as a meta-organising principle of global governance. It highlights the central claim that by understanding contestation as a critical discursive practice that is constitutive for normative change, a constructive contribution is made to the legitimacy ‘deficit’ debate. That is, it facilitates ways to allocate and establish regular contestation in selected sectors of governance, based on this innovative approach to theorising legitimate and just governance in the global realm under conditions of ongoing globalisation and inter-nationality.