Abstract
This chapter analyzes unequal regional development in Kazakhstan. Applying the nonlinear least squares (NLS) method in presence of spatial correlation, we estimate the convergence rate of wages across Kazakh regions for the period 2003–2009. The estimated convergence rate is about 3.5 % which is somewhat higher than the estimates obtained for the USA and Europe implying that half of the gap between regions is reduced in about 20 years. We do not find any significant effect of resource abundance on growth. However, human capital is an important factor contributing to growth. Our estimates indicate that a 1 % increase in the share of students increases the growth rate by 0.18 % points.
JEL classification: O47, P25
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Given a large share of growth driven by the oil sector, there are doubts whether the growth will indeed be pro-poor.
- 2.
For example, regional poverty rates varied from 2 to 32 % in 2002 (World Bank 2004).
- 3.
Equivalent to the European NUTS-3 level.
- 4.
For an empirical specification which includes human capital see Mankiw et al. (1992).
- 5.
Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1991).
- 6.
Equivalent to the European NUTS-1 or NUTS-2 level of aggregation.
- 7.
Equivalent to the European NUTS-3 level.
- 8.
1 USD is worth roughly 150 Tenge.
- 9.
- 10.
For example, growth of income in one region increases demand and thus may increase output and income in another region. Furthermore, differences in incomes generate migration flows which affect income differentials.
- 11.
Regional dummies appear to be statistically significant. Estimates for the dummy variables are not reported but are available from the author upon request.
- 12.
Regions where top ten oil and gas deposits are located.
- 13.
Usually authors would include the share of university graduates. However, this information is unavailable. Moreover, the information on university students is unavailable on the raion level and hence, we had to use the shares of university students on the oblast level.
- 14.
Estimation results are presented in table 5.6 in the appendix.
References
Anselin, L. (2000). Spatial econometrics. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), A companion to theoretical econometrics (Vol. 14, pp. 310–330). Oxford: Blackwell.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1990). Economic Growth and Convergence Across the United States. Working Paper 3419, NBER.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1991(1), 107–158.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J.G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J.G. (2000). Artificial regressions. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), A companion to theoretical econometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 16–37). Oxford: Blackwell.
Driscoll, J., & Kraay, A. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.
Higgins, M., Levy, D., & Young, A. (2006). Growth and convergence across the United States: Evidence from county-level data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 671–681.
Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312.
Huber, P. (2007). Regional labour market developments in transition: A survey of the empirical literature. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(2), 263–298.
King, R., & Rebelo, S. (1993). Transitional dynamics and economic growth in the neoclassical model. American Economic Review, 83(4), 908–931.
Kohl, R., Roudoi, A., & Zislin, J. (2005). Kazakhstan: Economic Performance Assessment. United States Agency for International Development, USAID.
Mankiw, G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407–437.
Marelli, E., & Signorelli, M. (2010). Transition, regional features, growth and labour market dynamics. In F. E. Caroleo & F. Pastore (Eds.), The labour market impact of the EU enlargement: A new regional geography of Europe? (pp. 99–147). Heidelberg: Physica.
Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.
Römisch, G. (2003). Regional disparities within accession countries. In G. Tumpel-Gugerell & P. Mooslechner (Eds.), Economic convergence and divergence in Europe: Growth and regional development in an enlarged European Union (pp. 183–208). Vienna: Austrian National Bank.
Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1995). Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. Working Paper no. 5398, NBER.
Solanko, L. (2003). An empirical note on growth and convergence across Russian regions. BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 9, Institute for Economics in Transition, Bank of Finland.
Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
World Bank (2004). Kazakhstan: Dimensions of Poverty in Kazakhstan. Report No. 30294-KZ, World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Wage Convergence
Given the production function \(Y = A \cdot K^{\alpha }L^{1-\alpha }\), then the marginal product of labor becomes (1 −α)A ⋅ k α, where \(k = K/L\). The log wage rate is thus: \(\ln w =\ln (1-\alpha ) +\ln A +\alpha \ln k\). Assuming that the capital share, α, is constant over time, the growth rate of wages becomes \(g_{w} = g_{A} +\alpha g_{k}\), where g w is the growth rate of wages, g A is the TFP growth rate, and g k is the growth rate of capital-to-labor ratio. Given the diminishing marginal product of capital, the steady state exists where g k = 0.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aldashev, A. (2015). Convergence Across Regions in Kazakhstan. In: Mussida, C., Pastore, F. (eds) Geographical Labor Market Imbalances. AIEL Series in Labour Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55203-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55203-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55202-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55203-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)