Skip to main content

The Breast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Whole-body MRI Screening
  • 1421 Accesses

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in industrialized countries. In Germany, for instance, nearly 60,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Early detection improves the chances of successful treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amarosa AR, McKellop J, Klautau Leite AP et al (2013) Evaluation of the kinetic properties of background parenchymal enhancement throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle. Radiology 268:356–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhate RD, Chakravorty A, Ebbs SR (2007) Management of breast cysts revisited. Int J Clin Pract 61:195–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brasic N, Wisner DJ, Joe BN (2013) Breast MR imaging for extent of disease assessment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:519–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes MJ, Bourke AG (2008) Radiological appearances of papillary breast lesions. Clin Radiol 63:1265–1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JH, Liu H, Baek HM et al (2008a) Magnetic resonance imaging features of fibrocystic change of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 26:1207–1214

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JH, Nalcioglu O, Su MY (2008b) Fibrocystic change of the breast presenting as a focal lesion mimicking breast cancer in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:1499–1505

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dalberg K, Hellborg H, Wärnberg F (2008) Paget’s disease of the nipple in a population based cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:313–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Bazelaire C, Pluvinage A, Chapelier M et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast. J Radiol 91:394–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeMartini W, Lehman C, Partridge S (2008) Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications. Acad Radiol 15:408–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey M, Martus P (2008) MRI breast screening. Lancet 371:1415–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T et al (2010) Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:587–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont WD, Page DL, Parl FF et al (1994) Long-term risk of breast cancer in women with fibroadenoma. N Engl J Med 331:10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer U (2000) Lehratlas der MR-Mammographie. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer U (2012) Practical MR mammography: high-resolution MRI of the breast. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis A, England D, Rowlands D, Bradley S (2002) Breast papilloma: mammogram, ultrasound and MRI appearances. Breast 11:394–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frei KA, Bonel HM, Pelte MF et al (2005) Paget disease of the breast: findings at magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol 40:363–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganau S, Tortajada L, Escribano F (2009) The great mimicker: fat necrosis of the breast – magnetic resonance mammography approach. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 38:189–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giess CS, Raza S, Birdwell RL (2013) Patterns of nonmasslike enhancement at screening breast MR imaging of high-risk premenopausal women. Radiographics 33:1343–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood HI, Heller SL, Kim S, Sigmund EE, Shaylor SD, Moy L (2013) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features. Radiographics 33:1569–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heywang-Köbrunner SH (1994) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Invest Radiol 29:94–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Hacker A, Sedlacek S (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging: the evolution of breast imaging. Breast Suppl 2:S77–S82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines N, Slanetz PJ, Eisenberg RL (2010) Cystic masses of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 194:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose M, Hashizume T, Seino N et al (2007) Atlas of breast magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36:51–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias A, Arias M, Santiago P et al (2007) Benign breast lesions that simulate malignancy: magnetic resonance imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36:66–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MA (2009) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 6:523–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs TW, Byrne C, Colditz G, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (1999) Radial scars in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen SA (2011) Ductal carcinoma in situ: detection, diagnosis, and characterization with magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32:306–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS et al (2008) Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Magn Reson Med 59:747–754

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen SA, Shimauchi A, Zak L et al (2011) The diverse pathology and kinetics of mass, nonmass, and focus enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:1382–1389

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JA, Son EJ, Youk JH et al (2011) MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors. Am J Roentgenol 196:1450–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SC, Rieber A, Gorich J et al (2000) Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography. Eur Radiol 10:1733–1736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl CK, Braun M (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging for breast cancer: pros and contras. Radiologe 48:358–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl CK, Kreft BP, Hauswirth A et al (1995) Fokale und diffuse Läsionen in der dynamischen MR-Mammographie gesunder Probandinnen. RÖFÖ 163:219–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusk U (1988) Multiple giant fibroadenomas in an adolescent female breast. Can J Surg 31:133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman CD (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010:150–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, International Breast MRI Consortium Working Group et al (2005) Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 103:1898–1905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le-Petross HT, Shetty MK (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32:266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ et al (2002) Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol 179:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J, Flanagan AM (2000) Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. J Clin Pathol 53:742–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macura KJ, Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA et al (2006) Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 26:1719–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann RM (2010) The effectiveness of MR imaging in the assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:259–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann RM, Veltman J, Huisman H et al (2011) Comparison of enhancement characteristics between invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:293–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDivitt RW, Stevens JA, Lee NC et al (1992) Histologic types of benign breast disease and the risk for breast cancer: The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Cancer 69:1408–14014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merrit CR, Rubin E (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system BI-RADS: ultrasound. American College of Radiology, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller BT, Abbott AM, Tuttle TM (2012) The influence of preoperative MRI on breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 19:536–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monticciolo DL (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for cancer diagnosis and staging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32:319–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E (2011) MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment. Lancet 378(9805):1804–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C et al (1997) MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 202:413–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patani N, Mokbel K (2008) The utility of MRI for screening and staging of breast cancer. Int J Clin Pract 62:450–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pediconi F, Occhiato R, Venditti F et al (2005) Radial scars of the breast: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography appearance. Breast J 11:23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfleiderer SO, Sachse S, Sauner D et al. (2004) Changes in magnetic resonance mammography due to hormone replacement therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 6(3):R232–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Planche K, Vinnicombe S (2004) Breast imaging in the new era. Cancer Imaging 4:39–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad SN, Houserkova D (2007) The role of various modalities in breast imaging. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 151:209–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prechtel K (1993) The pathology of mastopathy and breast cancer. Radiologe 33:236–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR et al (2011) Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol 21:2011–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Razek AA, Gaballa G, Denewer A et al (2010) Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors. NMR Biomed 23:619–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlossbauer T, Hellerhoff K, Reiser M (2008) Value of breast MRI as supplement to mammography and sonography for high risk breast cancer patients. Radiologe 48:351–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt WA, Boudousquie AC, Vetto JT et al (2001) Lymph nodes in the human female breast: a review of their detection and significance. Hum Pathol 32:178–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seely JM (2012) Management of breast magnetic resonance imaging-detected lesions. Can Assoc Radiol J 63:192–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soo MS, Dash N, Bentley R et al (2000) Tubular adenomas of the breast: imaging findings with histologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 174:757–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane AJ, Donnellan M, Matthews AR (1999) Clinical significance of intramammary lymph nodes. Breast 8:143–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strigel RM, Eby PR, Demartini WB et al (2010) Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI. Am J Roentgenol 195:792–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga J, Hama H, Kimura N et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papillomas of the breast. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:153–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsushima Y, Takahashi-Taketomi A, Endo K (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uematsu T, Kasami M (2009a) MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 1. Solid circumscribed masses. Jpn J Radiol 27:395–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uematsu T, Kasami M (2009b) MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 2. Cystic circumscribed masses. Jpn J Radiol 27:405–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch MA, Daniel BL, Mariano MN et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of fibrocystic change of the breast. Invest Radiol 40:436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whipp EC, Halliwell M (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging appearance in the postoperative breast: the clinical target volume-tumor and its relationship to the chest wall. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Park A, Morris E et al (2008) MRI screening in a clinic population with a family history of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:452–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saskia Ungerer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ungerer, S. (2014). The Breast. In: Puls, R., Hosten, N. (eds) Whole-body MRI Screening. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55201-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55201-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55200-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55201-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics