Skip to main content

Input Analysis in Simulation: A Case Study Based on the Variability in Manufacturing Lines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2052 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 280))

Abstract

Simulation is a powerful tool with acknowledged capabilities that has proved to be a valuable support instrument to decision making. In order to attain a proper representation from the system, it’s necessary to perceptively observe the system, to collect the data corresponding to the model’s input, and to perform an accurate analysis of the same data. The results and recommendations subsequent to the simulation are as legitimate as its modeling and inputs. In manufacturing systems build-to-order, that generates multiple products with identical characteristics and high levels of customization, the input analysis earns a vital role. On this article is proposed a methodology to deal with the variability inherent to systems, resorting to statistical inference methods: hypotheses testing. These methods are a vigorous tool on the analysis of data collected from the system. Furthermore, a case study based on a real manufacturing line will be presented, where the impact that the information inputted onto the model has in the simulation’s results shall be analyzed, regarding the processing lead time. In addition, the presented case study provides evidence of the two foremost pitfalls, referred by Law, which ought to be avoided. The usage of the mean towards a statistical distribution misleads the system’s analyst, whereas the normal distribution doesn’t accurately represent the processing times. An adequate replication of the variability over the manufacturing processes from the real system, throughout the probability’s distribution on an “off-line” simulation, comprises as a vital element to support decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arnold TB, Emerson JW (2011) Nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests for discrete null distributions. R J 3(2):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  2. Averill M (2007) Law. Simulation modeling and analysis. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biller B, Gunes C (2010) Introduction to simulation input modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2010 winter simulation conference (WSC). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chung CA (2003) Simulation modeling handbook: a practical approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer T, Kamps U (2013) Power maps in goodness-of-fit testing. Comput Stat 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ingalls RG (2011) Introduction to simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2011 winter simulation conference (WSC). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jahangirian M, Eldabi T et al (2010) imulation in manufacturing and business: a review. Eur J Oper Res 203(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kelton WD, Sadowski RP, Sadowski DA (2002) Simulation with ARENA, vol 3. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhl ME, Rochester NY et al (2009) Introduction to modeling and generating probabilistic input processes for simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference (WSC)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Law AM (2009) How to build valid and credible simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference (WSC). IEEE, pp 24–33

    Google Scholar 

  11. Law AM (2012) A tutorial on how to select simulation input probability distributions. In: Proceedings of the 2012 winter simulation conference (WSC). IEEE, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCrum-Gardner E (2008) Which is the correct statistical test to use? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(1):38–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Montgomery DC, Runger GC (1999) Applied statistics and probability for engineers. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Razali NM, Wah YB (2011) Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. J Stat Model Analytics 2(1):21–33

    Google Scholar 

  15. Razali NM, Shamsudin NR et al (2012) A comparison of normality tests using SPSS, SAS and Minitab: an application to health related quality of life data. In: International conference on statistics in science, business, and engineering. IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reis E (2001) Estatística aplicada: probabilidades, variáveis aleatórias, distribuições teóricas

    Google Scholar 

  17. Romao X, Delgado R, Costa A (2010) An empirical power comparison of univariate goodness-of-fit tests for normality. J Stat Comput Simul 80(5):545–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skoogh A, Perera T, Johansson B (2012) Input data management in simulation—Industrial practices and future trends. Simul Model Pract Theory 29:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Steele M, Chaseling J (2006) Powers of discrete goodness-of-fit test statistics for a uniform null against a selection of alternative distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput 35(4):1067–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swain JJ (2011) Discrete event simulation software tools: back to the future. OR/MS Today 38(5):56–69

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swain JJ (2013) Simulation software survey—Simulation: a better reality? OR/MS Today 40(5)

    Google Scholar 

  22. White KP, Ingalls RG (2009) Introduction to simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference (WSC). IEEE, pp 12–23

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao J, Xu X, Ding X (2010) New goodness of fit tests based on stochastic EDF. Commun Stat Theory Meth 6:1075–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lucas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lucas, D., Tenera, A. (2014). Input Analysis in Simulation: A Case Study Based on the Variability in Manufacturing Lines. In: Xu, J., Cruz-Machado, V., Lev, B., Nickel, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 280. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55182-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55182-6_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55181-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55182-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics