Skip to main content

Assessment of Hardware Product Design Defects by Fuzzy Neural Network Based on Genetic Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 280))

  • 2017 Accesses

Abstract

The assessment on hardware design defects plays an important role in the product development process. In order to improve the design quality through mitigating design defects, a model for assessing hardware product design defects is developed in this paper based on the design defects formation mechanism of product. A novel assessment method by applying fuzzy theory, genetic algorithm and neural network is proposed to construct assessment model. Assessment index is quantified by fuzzy language description. Fuzzy BP neural network tuned by genetic algorithm with the purpose of optimizing the connection weights and avoiding local minimum is used to evaluate probability of product design defects occurrence. The results obtained in this study demonstrated that the assessment model had excellent capabilities with a high accuracy and good training speed, thus provides an effective tool for assessing design defects of hardware product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carbone TA, Tippett DD (2004) Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Eng Manage J 16(4):28–35

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chin KS, Tang DW et al (2009) Assessing new product development project risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology. Expert Syst Appl 36(6):9879–9890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das SK, Gami S (2004) Expert rules for manufacturability analysis of misalignment defects during product design. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 17(1):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang C, Marle F (2012) A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management. Decis Support Syst 52(3):635–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan CF, Yu YC (2004) BBN-based software project risk management. J Syst Softw 73(2): 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frank MV (1995) Choosing among safety improvement strategies: a discussion with example of risk assessment and multi-criteria decision approaches for NASA. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 49(3):311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garvey PR, Lansdowne ZF (1998) Risk matrix: an approach for identifying, assessing, and ranking program risks. Air Force J Logistics 22(1):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Y, Zhang X et al (2012) Software project risk analysis using Bayesian networks with causality constraints. Decis Support Syst 56:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jardine IJA, Jackson D (1989) Risk assessment and optimization of a safety system using the MAROS simulation package. Qual Reliab Eng Int 5(2):131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khashman A (2010) Neural networks for credit risk evaluation: investigation of different neural models and learning schemes. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6233–6239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurihara K, Nishiuchi N (2002) Efficient Monte Carlo simulation method of GERT-type network for project management. Comput Ind Eng 42(2):521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee E, Park Y, Shin JG (2009) Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5880–5887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu W, Xiao C, Zhu M (2012) The classification research on design defect of hardware based on Gray clustering assessment. Mach Des Manuf 12:65–67 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lyneis JM, Ford DN (2007) System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. Syst Dyn Rev 23(2–3):157–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moll JV, Jacobs J, Kusters R, Trienekens J (2004) Defect detection oriented lifecycle modeling in complex product development. Inf Softw Technol 46(10):665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park BJ, Oh SK, Pedrycz W (2013) The design of polynomial function-based neural network predictors for detection of software defects. Inf Sci 229:40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sen P, Tan JK, Spencer D (1999) An integrated probabilistic risk analysis decision support methodology for systems with multiple state variables. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 64(1):73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Su XY, Deng Y et al (2012) An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades. Eng Fail Anal 26:164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Lin W, Huang YH (2010) A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects. Technovation 30(11):601–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Z, Li H, Jia Y (2013) A neural network model for expressway investment risk evaluation and its application. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 13(4):94–99

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu Z, Li H (2012) Assessing performance risk for complex product development: a simulation-based model. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(2):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the enterprises that provide data and design experts who participate in works of data fuzzy processing. We also thank M.S. Li and Yang Liu for their suggestions and providing language help on the earlier version of this article. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71161018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zheng, H., Liu, W., Xiao, C., Hu, W. (2014). Assessment of Hardware Product Design Defects by Fuzzy Neural Network Based on Genetic Algorithm. In: Xu, J., Cruz-Machado, V., Lev, B., Nickel, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 280. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55182-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55182-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55181-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55182-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics