Skip to main content
Book cover

Dry Mouth pp 119–132Cite as

Clinical Scoring Scales for Assessment of Dry Mouth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

A clinical oral dryness score (CODS) for clinical signs has been developed and has been found to be reliable and easy to use for routine assessment of the severity of dry mouth (hyposalivation). CODS is closely related to both the unstimulated salivary flow and the thickness of the mucin layer over the epithelium (mucosal wetness) suggesting a physiological basis to the feeling of xerostomia. CODS can be incorporated into the routine clinical assessment of dry mouth patients, particularly since the clinician would normally be undertaking most aspects of the clinical assessment routinely. In general practice, a low COD score (1–3) indicates mild dryness manageable normally in practice, whereas a high CODS (7–10) is an indication for referral for further investigation. A simple index for symptoms of xerostomia (bother index) has also been developed and correlates well with CODS and more objective measures of hyposalivation. This strongly suggests that both types of assessment can be useful in the assessment of the dry mouth patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sjögren H. Zur Kenntnis der Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (Keratitis filiformis bei Hypofunktion der Tränen-drusen). Acta Ophthalmol. 1933;11:1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sreebny LM, Valdini A. Xerostomia part I: relationship to other oral symptoms and salivary gland hypofunction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;66:451–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vissink A, Jansma J, Spijkeret FK, Burlage FR, Coppes RP. Oral sequelae of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;3:100–212.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sreebny LM. Saliva in health and disease: an appraisal and update. Int Dent J. 2000;50:140–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox PC, Busch KA, Baum BJ. Subjective reports of xerostomia and objective measures of salivary gland performance. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;115:581–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox PC. Xerostomia: recognition and management. Dent Assist. 2008;77:44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Osailan SM, Pramanik R, Shirlaw P, Proctor GB, Challacombe SJ. Clinical assessment of oral dryness: development of a scoring system related to salivary flow and mucosal wetness. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114:597–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenkins GN, Edgar WM. Effect of daily gum-chewing on salivary flow rate in man. J Dent Res. 1989;68:786–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kassan SS, Moutsopoulos HM. Clinical manifestations and early diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1275–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Escudier M, Ahmed N, Shirlaw P, Setterfield J, Tappuni A, Black MM, Challacombe SJ. Scoring system for mucosal disease severity with special reference to oral Lichen Planus. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157:765–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Setterfield J, Shirlaw PJ, Bhogal BS, Tilling K, Challacombe SJ, Black MM. Cicatricial pemphigoid: serial titres of circulating IgG and IgA antibasement membrane antibodies correlate with disease activity. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140:645–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanderson J, Nunes C, Escudier M, Barnard K, Shirlaw P, Odell E, Chinyama C, Challacombe S. Oro-facial granulomatosis: Crohn’s disease or new inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:840–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kassimos DG, Choy EHS, Challacombe SJ, Panayi GS. The prevalence of xerostomia in a population with primary generalized osteoarthritis (PGOA). Br J Rheumatol. 1995;34:132.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, Daniels TE, Fox PC, Fox RI, Kassan SS, Pillemer SR, Talal N, Weisman MH. European Study Group on classification criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome. Classification criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:554–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitcher JP, Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Heidenreich AM, Kitagawa K, Zhang S, Hamann S, Larkin G, McNamara NA, Greenspan JS, Daniels TE. Sjögren’s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Research Groups. A simplified quantitative method for assessing keratoconjunctivitis sicca from the Sjögren’s syndrome international registry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:405–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Percival S, Challacombe SJ, Marsh PD. Flow rates of resting whole and stimulated parotid saliva in relation to age and gender. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1416–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pramanik R, Osailan SM, Challacombe SJ, Urquhart D, Proctor GB. Protein and mucin retention on oral mucosal surfaces in dry mouth patients. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118:245–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Osailan SM, Pramanik R, Shirodaria S, Challacombe SJ, Proctor GB. Investigating the relationship between hyposalivation and mucosal wetness. Oral Dis. 2010;17:109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Napenas JJ, Brennan MT, Fox PC. Diagnosis and treatment of xerostomia (dry mouth). Odontology. 2009;97:76–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Navazesh M, Christensen C, Brightman V. Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of salivary gland hypofunction. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1363–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dawes C. Physiological factors affecting salivary flow rate, oral sugar clearance, and the sensation of dry mouth in man. J Dent Res. 1987;66:648–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomson WM, Chalmers JM, Spencer AJ, Ketabi M. The occurrence of xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction in a population-based sample of older South Australians. Spec Care Dent. 1999;19:20–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Osailan SM, Pramanik R, Proctor GB, Challacombe SJ. Semi-quantitative score for symptoms of oral dryness: “The Bother Index” (2014 submitted).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Challacombe PhD, FRC(Path), FDSRCS, FMedSci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Challacombe, S.J., Osailan, S.M., Proctor, G.B. (2015). Clinical Scoring Scales for Assessment of Dry Mouth. In: Carpenter, G. (eds) Dry Mouth. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55154-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55154-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55153-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55154-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics