Skip to main content

Female Director Characteristics of Audit Committee and Corporate Transparency

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 281))

Abstract

This paper empirically examines whether the characteristics of female directors of audit committee affect the corporate transparency based on the data of China’s Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2004 to 2007. The results from our sample show that, overall, the academic professional background of female directors has significantly positive impact on corporate transparency; the age of female directors has significantly negative impact on corporate transparency; the accounting expertise and education of female directors have no significant effects on corporate transparency. Further analysis also show that the significant impact relationship between the academic professional background or age of female directors and corporate transparency only in the lower legal level region. The result shows that the different characteristics of female directors pay different roles in affecting corporate transparency. This chapter provides some empirical evidences for perfecting the China’s audit committee system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bedard J, Chtorou SM, Courteau L (2004) The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing J Pract Theor 23(2):13–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bill BF, Hasan I et al (2009) Gender differences in financial reporting decision-making: Evidence from accounting conservatism. Available at SSRN

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess Z, Tharenou P (2002) Women board directors: characteristics of the few. J Bus Ethics 37:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bushman RJP, Smith A (2004) What determines corporate transparency. J Account Res 42:207–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dallas L (2002) The new managerialism and diversity on corporate boards of directors. Tulane Law Rev 76:1363–1405

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniela B, Lukas M (2008) Will women bewomen? analyzing the gender difference among financial experts. KYKLOS 61(3):364–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eagly A, Carli L (2003) The female leadership advantage: an evaluation of the evidence. Leadersh Q 14:34–807

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fama FE, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26:301–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan G, Wang XL, Zhu HP (2007) The report on the relative process of marketization of each region in China (2006). Economic Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ge W, Dawn M, Zhang JL (2011) Do cfos have style? an empirical investigation of the effect of individual cfos on accounting practices. Contemp Account Res 28(4):1141–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillman A, Cannella A et al (2002) Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how do directors differ? J Manage 28(6):747–7632

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang F, Yi X et al (2009) Background characteristics of the manager and excessive investment behavior of enterprises. Manage World China 1:30–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan SN, David R (1990) Outside directorships and corporate performance. J Financ Econ 27(2):389–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. La Porta R, Shleifer A et al (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106:1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maher P, Munro M (2000) Today’s board and the academic option. Ivey Bus J 64(6):8–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mattis MC (2000) Women corporate directors in the united states. In: Burke R, Mattis M (eds) Women on corporate boards of directors. Kluwer Academic, Netherlands, pp 43–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Nenova T (2003) The value of corporate voting rights and control: a cross-country analysis. J Financ Econ 68:325–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson J (1996) Feminism. Objectivity and economics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts J, McNulty T, Stiles P (2005) Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: creating accountability in the boardroom. Brit J Manage 16:S5–S26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schubert R (2006) Analyzing and managing risks—on the importance of gender difference in risk attitudes. Manag Financ 32:706–715

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sealy R, Singh V, Vinnicombe S (2007) The female FTSE report 2007. Cranfield

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sheridan A, Milgate G (2005) Accessing board positions: a comparison of female and male board members’ views. Corp Governance Int Rev 13(6):847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh V, Terjesen S, Vinnicombe S (2008) Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: how do women and men differ? Eur Manage J 26(1):48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith N, Smith V, Verner M (2005) Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2 500 danish firms. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1:708

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tang XS, Ma C (2012) Background characteristics, resignation behavior of the independent directors and enterprise value. Account Econ Stud Chin 4:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trautman L (2012) The matrix: the board’s responsibility for director selection and recruitment. Fla State Univ Bus Rev 11(1):1–66

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waelchli U, Zeller J (2013) Old captains at the helm: chairman age and firm performance. J Banking Financ 37:1612–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Waring M (1988) If women counted: a new feminist economics. Harper and Row, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xiang R (2013) The characteristics of financial independent directors and the accounting conservatism. In: The 19th Chinese finance annual conference

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Xiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xiang, R., He, X., Cheng, Y. (2014). Female Director Characteristics of Audit Committee and Corporate Transparency. In: Xu, J., Cruz-Machado, V., Lev, B., Nickel, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 281. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55122-2_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55122-2_90

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55121-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55122-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics