Skip to main content

Tissue Acquisition for Histologic Diagnosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Autoimmune Pancreatitis
  • 1082 Accesses

Abstract

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is recognized as a distinct clinical entity, and it is also identified as a chronic inflammatory process of the pancreas in which the autoimmune mechanism is involved. The diagnosis of AIP is clinically challenging because it is a rare disease, which closely mimics more common pancreaticobiliary malignancies in its presentation such as obstructive jaundice and pancreatic mass. Type 1 AIP has dense periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with storiform fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis, whereas type 2 is distinguished from type 1 by granulocyte epithelial lesion, less prominent lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and less prominent storiform fibrosis [1]. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for AIP were developed based on the agreement of an international panel of experts and ICDC include both type 1 and 2 AIP [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhang L, Chari S, Smyrk TC, et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 and type 2: an international consensus study on histopathologic diagnostic criteria. Pancreas. 2011;40:1172–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni L, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. 2011;40:352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Micames C, Jowell PS, White R, et al. Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:690–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Detlefsen S, Mohr Drewes A, Vyberg M, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by core needle biopsy: application of six microscopic criteria. Virchows Arch. 2009;454:531–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirano K, Fukushima N, Tada M, et al. Diagnostic utility of biopsy specimens for autoimmune pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:765–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ, Chari ST. Chronic pancreatitis: focal pancreatitis or cancer? Is there a role for FNA/biopsy? Autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2006;38 Suppl 1:S30–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mizuno N, Bhatia V, Hosoda W, et al. Histological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a comparison study with EUS-FNA. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:742–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I, Saito Y. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2011;23 Suppl 1:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, et al. Use of samples from endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, 19-gauge, fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song TJ, Kim JH, Kim MH, et al. A comparison of clinical findings between histologically confirmed type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:700–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujii LL, Chari ST, El-Youssef M, Takahashi N, Topazian MD, Zhang L, Levy MJ. Pediatric pancreatic EUS-guided trucut biopsy for evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:824–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, et al. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:321–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hucl T, Wee E, Anuradha S, Gupta R, Ramchandani M, Rakesh K, et al. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:792–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3733–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Kon Ryu MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ryu, J.K. (2015). Tissue Acquisition for Histologic Diagnosis. In: Kamisawa, T., Chung, J. (eds) Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55086-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55086-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55085-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55086-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics